Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman



SEO fundamentals Understanding the importance of links
In this course, author David Booth explains what search engine optimization (SEO) is and how you can start using it to increase your website's visibility to search engines and attract the right…

By: IT Tutorials

Continued here:
SEO fundamentals Understanding the importance of links – Video



SEO fundamentals Understanding Google+ Local
In this course, author David Booth explains what search engine optimization (SEO) is and how you can start using it to increase your website's visibility to search engines and attract the right…

By: IT Tutorials

Read this article:
SEO fundamentals Understanding Google+ Local – Video

Aug 312014

Fifth Amendment: Protection against abuse of government authorityWhat is the Fifth Amendment?No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensationThe Fifth Amendment Defined:The Fifth Amendment stems from English Common Law and traces back to the Magna Carta in 1215.The Fifth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.Stipulations of the 5th Amendment:The Fifth Amendment is asserted in any proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, judicial, investigatory, or adjudicatory. The Fifth Amendment protects against all disclosures where the witness reasonably believes the evidence can be used in a criminal prosecution and can lead to the spawning of other evidence that might be used against the individual.The Fifth Amendment guarantees an American individual the right to trial by Grand Jury for specific crimes, the right not to be tried and subsequently punished more than once for the same crime, the right to be tried with only due process of the law and the right to be awarded fair compensation for any property seized by the government for public use.The Fifth Amendment also guarantees the individual the right to refrain from self-incrimination by pleading the fifth to any questions or inquiries that may give way to an additional punishment or the notion of a guilty plea.State Timeline for Ratification of the Bill of RightsNew Jersey:November 20, 1789; rejected article IIMaryland:December 19, 1789; approved allNorth Carolina:December 22, 1789; approved allSouth Carolina: January 19, 1790; approved allNew Hampshire: January 25, 1790; rejected article IIDelaware: January 28, 1790; rejected article INew York: February 27, 1790; rejected article IIPennsylvania: March 10, 1790; rejected article IIRhode Island: June 7, 1790; rejected article IIVermont: November 3, 1791; approved allVirginia: December 15, 1791; approved all

Fifth Amendment: Protection against abuse of government authorityWhat is the Fifth Amendment? No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation

The Fifth Amendment Defined:

The Fifth Amendment stems from English Common Law and traces back to the Magna Carta in 1215.

The Fifth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.

The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.Stipulations of the 5th Amendment: The Fifth Amendment is asserted in any proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative, judicial, investigatory, or adjudicatory. The Fifth Amendment protects against all disclosures where the witness reasonably believes the evidence can be used in a criminal prosecution and can lead to the spawning of other evidence that might be used against the individual.

The Fifth Amendment guarantees an American individual the right to trial by Grand Jury for specific crimes, the right not to be tried and subsequently punished more than once for the same crime, the right to be tried with only due process of the law and the right to be awarded fair compensation for any property seized by the government for public use.

The Fifth Amendment also guarantees the individual the right to refrain from self-incrimination by pleading the fifth to any questions or inquiries that may give way to an additional punishment or the notion of a guilty plea.State Timeline for Ratification of the Bill of Rights New Jersey:November 20, 1789; rejected article II

Maryland:December 19, 1789; approved all

North Carolina:December 22, 1789; approved all

View original post here:
5th Amendment – Laws.com



First Amendment Rights Can Be Terminated
According to this Chicago Police Officer, “Your First Amendment Right can be terminated if you're creating a scene OR whatever”. I figured they must have broke the 'whatever' clause, but the…

By: Savas Kenan

More:
First Amendment Rights Can Be Terminated – Video

Now that Robert Copeland has finally resigned as a police commissioner in Wolfeboro, N.H., after referring to President Obama with a vile racial epithet, there seems to be a move afoot in some quarters to portray him as a victim of political correctness and a martyr in the cause of free speech. He is neither, and to think so betrays a thorough misunderstanding of constitutional rights.

Copelands remark, which contained a racial slur preceded by an obscenity, was overheard in a restaurant in March by a resident. She brought it to the attention of the town manager and the other two members of the police commission, an elected body that hires, fires and disciplines police officers and sets their salaries. When confronted about it, Copeland, 82, was hardly apologetic, writing in response that, I believe I did use the N word in reference to the current occupant of the Whitehouse. For this, I do not apologize he meets and exceeds my criteria for such.

Earlier this month, about 100 residents attended a public meeting that was held to discuss the issue. Given that Wolfeboro, a wealthy resort town of 6,300 residents, has no mechanism for removing public officials between elections, many of those who attended were there to urge him to resign. Eventually he did, much to the relief of other town officials, who feared that his widely reported remark might lead to a boycott by potential visitors this summer.

Both at the meeting and subsequently, defenders of Copeland have suggested that the public outcry that greeted his remark was an example of the thought police stifling his free speech rights. Actually, the whole affair was a vindication of free speech.

The First Amendment provides that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech or of the press. That is, government may not interfere with freedom of expression. It does not guarantee, however, that free speech will be free of the consequences it may incur in the marketplace of ideas.

In this instance, Copeland exercised his right to speak his mind if, in fact, he still has one and defended vigorously his right to do so. That did not mean that those who learned of his views were obliged to treat them with tolerance or refrain from exercising their own speech rights. Constituents of an elected official are under no obligation to remain silent when that official expresses views, even privately, that they find repugnant. In fact, many residents of Wolfeboro may have felt that their silence could have been interpreted as an endorsement of, or at least acquiescence in, Copelands slur.

So they were perfectly free to call on him to resign, and people living farther away certainly had a right to express themselves by threatening a tourist boycott. Just because a person has a right to say something doesnt mean that he has a right not to be contradicted, or to be immune from public condemnation.

The faith of the nations founders was that so long as government was barred from prohibiting speech it deemed dangerous or offensive, unsound views would be exposed as such in the welter of public debate, and wiser counsel would prevail. Thats what happened in this case.

More:
Editorial: Free Speech Vs. Free Speech

The Madison-based Freedom From Religion Foundation is sponsoring a commercial featuring Ron Reagan on Comedy Central Thursday night, where he concludes with: “Ron Reagan. Lifelong atheist. Not afraid of burning in hell.”

The son of President Ronald Reagan has long been an outspoken atheist and is an honorary officer of FFRF.

The ad will air during The Daily Show, which begins at 10 p.m., and again during the Colbert Report, which airs at 10:30 p.m. It will also appear during the reruns two hours later, for a total of four showings.

Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of FFRF, said that Reagan “had done an ad for us for Air America Radio when that was on. I had in mind we could recreate this as a visual for several years and we finally made it happen.”

You can watch the ad here.

While airing the ads during two of Comedy Central’s most popular shows was quite costly compared to other times, Gaylor said the audience is the right fit for the message.

“Both shows are highly irreverent, and yet are considered news sources for young people, so it was the right national audience,” she said. “It’s kind of a splashy way to debut the ad, and then we’ll air it during cheaper times.”

Here’s the entire text of the 30-second spot: “Hi, Im Ron Reagan, an unabashed atheist, and Im alarmed by the intrusions of religion into our secular government. Thats why Im asking you to support the Freedom From Religion Foundation, the nations largest and most effective association of atheists and agnostics, working to keep state and church separate, just like our Founding Fathers intended. Please support the Freedom From Religion Foundation. Ron Reagan. Lifelong atheist. Not afraid of burning in hell.”

Gaylor and her husband, Dan Barker, who is also co-president of FFRF, are in Canada for a conference.

“The irony of this whole thing is they don’t get Comedy Central in Canada,” she said.

Go here to read the rest:
Freedom From Religion ad by Ron Reagan airs on Comedy Central



Navy Chaplain Exercises Second Amendment Right Behavior
Seventh Day Adventist Navy Chaplain puts up Christmas decorations armed with a .38/.357 cal. pistol in a shoulder harness with two speed loaders. His wife is…

By: James Dean

Excerpt from:
Navy Chaplain Exercises Second Amendment Right Behavior – Video



Michael Fertik discusses E.U. privacy ruling on BBC Radio
Reputation.com CEO Michael Fertik explains why he believes the E.U.'s controversial ruling against Google is not a matter of free speech, but rather a step in the right direction in regards…

By: reputationcom

Read more:
Michael Fertik discusses E.U. privacy ruling on BBC Radio – Video

MIAMI (AP) With 825 miles of Florida beaches to plant your beach umbrella on, picking just the right spot for you and your family can be daunting. Do you want adventure or laid-back beaches? Family friendly or romantic setting?

View original post here:
Tools help Florida visitors plan beach vacations



Google Acknowledges Its Employee's Right to Free Speech
At Google's annual meeting of shareholders, Justin Danhof of the National Center for Public Policy Research asked the company Chairman, Eric Schmidt, about Google's policy regarding it's employees'…

By: SunnyDayAmerica

View post:
Google Acknowledges Its Employee’s Right to Free Speech – Video



Issue Advocacy Funding: Affirming the Right to Corporate Free Speech
Godfrey Kahn attorney Mike Wittenwyler explains the 7th Circuit Court ruling [WI Right to Life v. Barland (7th Cir. May 14, 2014).] This decision makes cle…

By: WMC501

Go here to see the original:
Issue Advocacy Funding: Affirming the Right to Corporate Free Speech – Video



Boom Beach Quest to Freedom: #1- The Beginning
The ultimate Quest to Freedom has begun! If you are interested in what this series is, then you are in the right place. My new Quest to Freedom series is basically a Single Player NPC Base…

By: Beacher Joe

Link:
Boom Beach Quest to Freedom: #1- The Beginning – Video



CENSORSHIP, LOSS OF 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS. END TIMES PROPHECY NEWS
AMENDING THE FIRST AMENDMENT, RELIGIOUS BIBLE CENSORSHIP, ENDING THE LEGAL RIGHT TO OPPOSE THE DEMOCRAT PARTY PLATFORM'S VIEWS! THE LEGAL RIGHTS TO DEBATE THE ISSUES http://youtu.be/sCbA3NDznd8…

By: Carrie Geren Scoggins

Visit link:
CENSORSHIP, LOSS OF 1ST AMENDMENT RIGHTS, CARRIE GEREN SCOGGINS. END TIMES PROPHECY NEWS – Video

Have we lost free speech in America?

Our First Amendment right for all Americans is free speech.

Protesters, journalists Civil-rights advocates, street preachers and all Americans

have enjoyed the right of free speech.

Free speech gets on our nerves if the language doesn’t fit

our philosophy, religious teachings, traditions or political views.

Free speech can inspire, encourage, help, teach and motivate but it can also

See the original post here:
Speech is not so free in America

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

(CNN) — Acting on a conservative battle cry and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about her agency’s targeting of conservative and other groups.

The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power issues between the branches of government, political questions over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner’s individual Fifth Amendment rights.

Lerner is in the middle of that trio. Until she retired last year, she ran the IRS division in charge of tax exempt status. An inspector general’s report concluded her staff had inappropriately targeted Tea Party and other groups for extra scrutiny.

The term “progressive” was also flagged but the inspector general report indicated that conservative terms drew more attention from the IRS.

The Fifth Amendment question

For nearly a year, Lerner has refused House requests to testify on the matter, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Republicans insist that doesn’t apply here, that she waived the right by first asserting her innocence when she appeared before the House Oversight Committee last May.

“Mrs. Lerner made 17 separate factual assertions before invoking her right to remain silent,” proclaimed Rep. Richard Nugent, Republican of Florida, as he opened up Wednesday’s debate. “You can’t make selective assertions and still invoke your Fifth Amendment right.”

Lerner’s attorney, William Taylor, has dismissed that argument repeatedly and sent a statement rejecting it again Wednesday.

Visit link:

GOP-led House votes to hold former IRS official in contempt



How To Select The Right SEO Service Provider
View more details at http://favoredroz.mycashbackbooking.com/

By: Roxanne Roumell

Continued here:
How To Select The Right SEO Service Provider – Video

STORY HIGHLIGHTS

(CNN) — Acting on a conservative battle cry and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about her agency’s targeting of conservative and other groups.

The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power issues between the branches of government, political questions over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner’s individual Fifth Amendment rights.

Lerner is in the middle of that trio. Until she retired last year, she ran the IRS division in charge of tax exempt status. An inspector general’s report concluded her staff had inappropriately targeted Tea Party and other groups for extra scrutiny.

The term “progressive” was also flagged but the inspector general report indicated that conservative terms drew more attention from the IRS.

The Fifth Amendment question

For nearly a year, Lerner has refused House requests to testify on the matter, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Republicans insist that doesn’t apply here, that she waived the right by first asserting her innocence when she appeared before the House Oversight Committee last May.

“Mrs. Lerner made 17 separate factual assertions before invoking her right to remain silent,” proclaimed Rep. Richard Nugent, Republican of Florida, as he opened up Wednesday’s debate. “You can’t make selective assertions and still invoke your Fifth Amendment right.”

Lerner’s attorney, William Taylor, has dismissed that argument repeatedly and sent a statement rejecting it again Wednesday.

Read more:

House holds Lois Lerner in contempt

Acting on a conservative battle cry and potentially triggering a court battle with the Obama administration, the Republican-led House voted Wednesday to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt of Congress for refusing to answer questions about her agency’s targeting of conservative and other groups.

The 231-187 vote fell almost entirely along party lines, a decision that cut across three sharp divides: balance of power issues between the branches of government, political questions over the IRS scandal, and a Constitutional debate over Lerner’s individual Fifth Amendment rights.

Lerner is in the middle of that trio. Until she retired last year, she ran the IRS division in charge of tax exempt status. An inspector general’s report concluded her staff had inappropriately targeted Tea Party and other groups for extra scrutiny.

The term “progressive” was also flagged but the inspector general report indicated that conservative terms drew more attention from the IRS.

The Fifth Amendment question

For nearly a year, Lerner has refused House requests to testify on the matter, citing her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.

Republicans insist that doesn’t apply here, that she waived the right by first asserting her innocence when she appeared before the House Oversight Committee last May.

“Mrs. Lerner made 17 separate factual assertions before invoking her right to remain silent,” proclaimed Rep. Richard Nugent, Republican of Florida, as he opened up Wednesday’s debate. “You can’t make selective assertions and still invoke your Fifth Amendment right.”

Lerner’s attorney, William Taylor, has dismissed that argument repeatedly and sent a statement rejecting it again Wednesday.

“Today’s vote has nothing to do with the facts or the law,” Taylor wrote. “Its only purpose is to keep the baseless IRS “conspiracy” alive through the midterm elections. Ms. Lerner has not committed contempt of Congress. She did not waive her Fifth Amendment rights by proclaiming her innocence.”

View original post here:

House votes to hold ex-IRS official in contempt

May 082014



How To Get More Views (SEO)
Want to learn “how to get more views”? You've come to the right place! Today I show you how to use Search Engine Optimization and learn “how to get more views”. Want to join Maker Studios?…

By: GamersofAwesomeness

Excerpt from:
How To Get More Views (SEO) – Video

May 082014



English Democrats
English Democrat Steve Uncles talking on BBC radio4 defending the right of free speech.

By: EnglishDemocrat

Here is the original post:
English Democrats – Video



FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin




Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by us.groups.yahoo.com