Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman

Bitcoin Giveaway – Join the Revolution
If you have been wanting to buy some bitcoin for the first time, this is your opportunity to win some for free! Simply create a digital wallet and post the public key in the comment section…

By: Brett Sanders

Read more from the original source:
Bitcoin Giveaway – Join the Revolution – Video

A video that emerged over the weekend appears to show Darren Wilson, the cop who fatally shot teenager Michael Brown in a St. Louis suburb in August, telling a citizen he doesn’t have the right to record video of a 2013 encounter.

The details of the entire exchangeare a little murky. But in almost all cases in the United Statesyou actually do have the right to record police and other public officials carrying out their duties.

There are some state wiretapping laws that make it illegal to record audio of people without their consent, but the courts have consistently held that the First Amendment protects citizens’ right to record the police when they’re on the job. The police can’t stop you unless you’re interfering with their work — and they can’t take away your smart phone or delete the recordings just because you took video. Police need a warrant to mess with the content of your cell phone.

The Department of Justice has even officially weighed in on citizen recordings of law enforcement officers. Here’s what it said in a 2012 letter toattorneys for the Baltimore Police Department:

Policies should affirmatively set forth the contours of individuals First Amendment right to observe and record police officers engaged in the public discharge of their duties. Recording governmental officers engaged in public duties is a form of speech through which private individuals may gather and disseminate information of public concern, including the conduct of law enforcement officers.

Obviously, just because you have the right doesn’t mean all law enforcement officials will respect it. But there’s also a growing movement to make sure that police actions are almost always facing the scrutiny of video evidence by use of mandatory body cameras, or “bodycams,” on officers.

The cameras could potentially provide an extra layer of digital oversight over law enforcement behavior — as well as a way for officers to verify their side of the story if a situation gets messy.

In the wake of the Ferguson protests, makers of such deviceshave seen their business boom.

Even the American Civil Liberties Union is on board with thethe useof bodycams, albeit with a fewcaveats about data retention and privacy implications. “Although we generally take a dim view of the proliferation of surveillance cameras in American life, police on-body cameras are different because of their potential to serve as a check against the abuse of power by police officers,” the group said in a 2013 policy paper.

Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government.

Read the original here:
Yes, you have a right to record the police.

Senators Pass Public Beaches Parks Authority Bill

By: ZNSNetwork

Here is the original post:
Senators Pass Public Beaches & Parks Authority Bill – Video

Finding Your Roots Season 2 Episode 04 Roots of Freedom Full
Finding Your Roots with Henry Louis Gates, Jr. is a Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) public television series hosted by Professor Henry Louis Gates. The first season originally aired March…

By: FindingYourRootsFull

Read more here:
Finding Your Roots Season 2 Episode 04 Roots of Freedom Full – Video

Keynote Address: Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment
Keynote Address: Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment.

By: BY65464

View original post here:
Keynote Address: Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment – Video

Yale Conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment
Yale Conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment.

By: Ny78121dsfd

Follow this link:
Yale Conference on Public Health in the Shadow of the First Amendment – Video

Disciplinary hearing for SB officer moved to later date
A South Bend Police officer is fighting for his job. Jack Stilp was questioned before the Board of Public Safety today, but he cited the Fifth Amendment right not to incriminate himself.


See more here:
Disciplinary hearing for SB officer moved to later date – Video

Senator Ron Wyden thought he knew what was going on.

The Democrat from Oregon, who has served on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence since 2001, thought he knew the nature of the National Security Agencys surveillance activities. As a committee member with a classified clearance, he received regular briefings to conduct oversight.

But when the The New York Times broke the story in late 2005 that the spy agency was engaging in warrantless wiretapping, Wyden was as surprised as the rest of us.

He was surprised again when, six months later, USA Today published a different story revealing for the first time that the NSA was secretly collecting the phone call records of tens of millions of Americans, records that US telecoms were willingly handing over without a warrant. Two of the three identified telecoms denied the allegations, and the story quickly died. But its ghost lingered on, neither fully confirmed nor denied, haunting Wyden. It took another seven years for a document leaked in 2013 by Edward Snowden to end the speculation and finally confirm that the bulk-collection phone records program existed.

Wyden doesnt want to say when exactly he learned of the phone records program but says The New York Times story and the USA Today [piece] were both real wakeup calls. Speaking to WIRED during a recent visit to the Bay Area, he adds that it was very frustrating to have to wait seven years after the USA Today story broke for details of the program to come out.

Wyden has spent a lot of time biting his lip since those early revelations, unable to disclose what he knows but going as far as he could to drop hints over the years. In 2011, two years before the Snowden leaks, he warned fellow lawmakers that the government had devised secret interpretations of the Patriot Act to legally justify its surveillanceinterpretations dramatically different from how the public understood the law should be interpreted. Then in July 2013, as the first Snowden documents were leaking, he warned again that the public was seeing just the tip of a larger iceberg and that lawmakers were being misled by intelligence officials about their activities.

The senator hedged when asked by WIRED if the Snowden revelations have now fully exposed the iceberg, or if were still just seeing the tip. All he would say was that there are things that even he remains ignorant aboutsuch as the ways in which the government is using Executive Order 12333 to conduct overseas data collection without court oversight.

Wyden is gearing up for a battle on Capitol Hill to reform the Patriot Act, particularly Section 215, which the NSA used to authorize and justify its phone records collection program. This and other portions of the law, passed in the wake of 9/11,expire in June and are up for re-authorization.

Wyden spoke with WIRED about the difficulty of keeping mum over the years on classified matters; about his public showdown with intelligence chief James Clapper over the NSAs data collection on Americans; and about the governments use of zero-day exploits, a practice that undermines the Obama administrations assertions about the importance of securing the nations critical infrastructure systems. But one question he wouldnt answerabout allegations that US telecoms have been helping the NSA undermine foreign networks.

The rest is here:
Pro-Privacy Senator Wyden on Fighting the NSA From Inside the System

Police Officers Arrest Man for Swearing in Public
Suit claims police violated his constitutional right to free speech – LoneWolf Sager. Know your rights when talking to a police officer: There's no law that requires you to talk to a police…

By: daiseki0402

Read the original post:
Police Officers Arrest Man for Swearing in Public – Video

Click Here to access the online Public Inspection File

Viewers with disabilities can get assistance accessing this station’s FCC Public Inspection File by contacting the station with the information listed below. Questions or concerns relating to the accessibility of the FCC’s online public file system should be directed to the FCC at 888-225-5322, 888-835-5322 (TTY), or

Public File Liaison:

Jolene Jensen – 715-852-1557

Station Contact Info:

WEAU 13 NEWS 1907 S. Hastings Way Eau Claire, WI 54701

By Phone: Main Number (715) 835-1313 and (715) 832-3474. Tip Line (715) 839-WEAU – (715) 839-9328 Sports Line (715) 852-1537

Read the rest here:
Eau Claire students host "First Amendment Free Food Festival"

Banning e-cigarettes from Hawaii County parks beaches and buildings
October 14, 2014 The Hawaii County Council Committee on Public Safety and Mass Transit hears testimony and discusses a bill to ban e-cigarettes and other electronic smoking devices from any…

By: Occupy Hawaii

Here is the original post:
Banning e-cigarettes from Hawaii County parks beaches and buildings – Video

A new Freedom Camping bylaw will be in place by Labour Weekend.

Council deliberated on submissions to its draft Freedom Camping Bylaw today, and will look to adopt a revised draft bylaw at its meeting on 22 October.

In the past few months we’ve had a draft Freedom Bylaw out for public consultation. We had over 120 submissions and submitters were given the opportunity to speak to Council at a hearing last month.

At today’s deliberations Council did decide on some changes to the proposed draft bylaw that included:

Removing the proposed restriction that would prohibit freedom camping in restricted areas during summer and holiday weekends.

Extending the proposed departure time from 8am to 9am.

Extending the number of nights freedom campers can stay in a restricted area to 2 consecutive nights.

Having designating areas for freedom camping within all restricted areas.

Some changes to proposed areas where freedom camping is prohibited or restricted Council agreed to keep the proposed district-wide restriction that all freedom campers must be certified self-contained.

To see all the summary of submissions and the decisions that council considered see the deliberations decisions report. Earlier this year we had a judicial review of our current Freedom Camping Bylaw sought by the New Zealand Motor Caravan Association (NZMCA). The High Court decision was released late last month and found that our Bylaw is legal, but two clauses in our Public Places Bylaw and Parking Control Bylaw should be revoked. Council formally revoked these today.

Read this article:
New freedom camping bylaw in time for Labour Weekend

Detroit Performs Clip: Pottery at Liberty Craftworks
Air date: 10/14/14. We visit the pottery shop at Liberty Craftworks to see the beautiful plates, pots, crocks, and more are churned out each day. Episode 205/Segment 2.

By: Detroit Public TV

Excerpt from:
Detroit Performs Clip: Pottery at Liberty Craftworks – Video

Wellington City Councils environment committee agreed at yesterdays meeting to welcome and allow campers visiting the Capital to freedom camp except in some parts of the city.

The Council has been permissive but at the same time protective of Wellingtons open green spaces, reserves, flora and fauna.

Changes have been made to part (12) of the Public Places by-law consistent with the Freedom Camping Act 2011. Parliament originally intended to prohibit freedom camping and now the permissive legislation allows it, except where it is prohibited. The recommendations from the committee will have further public consultation after the November Council meeting.

Councillor Helene Ritchie says, “Visitors and campers to Wellington will be able to enjoy the city and the natural environment we have so close to the heart of the CBD, the harbour and the Coast. However, camping will be prohibited in central city parks such as Frank Kitts or Waitangi Park; campervans will eventually have a new site on Port land, and camping on reserve land or inner city parks will still not be allowed”.

The Bylaw will regulate camping in specific public places to protect particular areas and the health and safety of visitors to these areas, with notices and friendly rangers who will have warrants but will only as a last resort exercise the power that they will have to fine people up to $200 who damage plants or leave litter behind.

49 submissions were received as part of the consultation on the draft bylaw and most were supportive of the proposed changes.

While freedom camping in most reserves is still restricted under reserve management plans, except for some coastal areas, freedom camping will be encouraged at the Te Kopahou Reserve entrance at Owhiro Bay, and campers in self-contained vehicles will be able to stay at the southern end of Evans Bay marina.

See the original post here:
Wellington welcomes freedom campers

Dr. Deepak Srivastava, a leading biomedical research policy expert, will discuss “Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine and Policy Impediments to the New Future” at Rice University’s Baker Institute for Public Policy Oct. 21. The event is free and open to the public, but registration is required.

Who: Dr. Deepak Srivastava, the Baker Institute’s nonresident scholar for biomedical research policy and the Younger Family Director and senior investigator at the Gladstone Institute of Cardiovascular Disease.

Neal Lane, the Malcolm Gillis University Professor, senior fellow in science and technology policy at Rice’s Baker Institute for Public Policy and a professor of physics and astronomy, will give introductory remarks.

What: A presentation titled “Stem Cells, Regenerative Medicine and Policy Impediments to the New Future.”

When: Tuesday, Oct. 21, 7:45-9:30 a.m. Breakfast will be served at 7:45.

Where: Rice University, James A. Baker III Hall, Kelly International Conference Facility, 6100 Main St.

Stem cells and regenerative medicine are exciting and emerging fields of biomedical research, according to event organizers. Proposed applications include treating conditions such as blindness, diabetes and heart disease. Regenerative medicine could also help heal failing organ systems and replace damaged tissue. While these fields hold great promise for medicine, external factors limit and, in some cases, stall research, organizers said. Ethical controversies surrounding human embryonic stem cells, policy issues affecting federal and state funding and regulation, and economic pressures all play a role in determining the future of research.

In his presentation, Srivastava will explore the current and future potential of stem cells and regenerative medicine. Following the presentation, he will discuss policy challenges and opportunities with Lane.

The event is sponsored by the Baker Institute’s Science and Technology Policy Program and the Health Policy Forum.

Read the original post:
Policy impediments to using stem cells and regenerative medicine to be discussed at Rice's Baker Institute Oct. 21

Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip40


Read more:
Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip40 – Video

Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip39


Original post:
Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip39 – Video

Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip30


Excerpt from:
Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip30 – Video

Longtime reporters who cover the NSA know that any time we ask the obstinate spy agency for information, were probably going to hit a brick wall. But who would have thought that trying to obtain information about information the agency has already given us would lead to the same wall?

Thats what happened when the Federation of American Scientists filed a FOIA request with the Defense Department (of which the NSA is a part) earlier this year seeking information about any authorized leaks of intelligence made to the media during the previous 12 months.

The response they got (.pdf) from the National Security Agency might well have come from Winston Smiths Ministry of Truth.

The document responsive to your request has been reviewed by this Agency as required by the FOIA and has been found to be currently and properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526, the letter read. The document is classified because its disclosure could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally grave damage to the national security.

Last year, Congress amended the Intelligence Authorization Act to require government officials to notify lawmakers whenever they disclose national security secrets to the media as part of an authorized leak. Under Section 504 of the statute (.pdf), the government official responsible for authorizing the disclosure has to submit to congressional intelligence committees a timely report about the disclosure, if the information is classified at the time of the leak or was declassified for the purpose of making the leak, and if the information being disclosed was made with the intent or knowledge that such information will be made publicly available.

There have been numerous authorized leaks over the years, including the controversial White House leaks about the killing of Osama bin Laden. There have been even more unauthorized leaks, howeverby government officials and workers. It makes sense for Congress to want to know when classified information has been leaked or declassified in order to distinguish official leaks from unauthorized ones. Lawmakers on the intelligence committees look silly when they tell reporters they cant talk about something, while government officials are freely yapping about the same topic behind their backs. They also look silly when they publicly call for a criminal investigation into a leak that turns out to have been authorized. And, of course, members of both parties in Congress want to know when the party in power in the White House might be authorizing leaks for political gain.

But once those leaks are made to the media and published, why shouldnt the public also be able to know when the information came from an authorized source or an unauthorized one?

Steve Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists Project on Government Secrecy, noted in his letter to the NSA appealing its response (.pdf) that It is well established that information, including classified information, that has been publicly disclosed on an authorized basis loses its exemption from disclosure under FOIA.

He has a theory, however, about why the NSA might not want to disclose what it has disclosed. He says that even though the statute refers to information that the leaker expects will be made public, the NSA might not want the public to know which information was part of an authorized leak because some might have been provided off the record.

I think its more likely that these disclosures were part of a negotiation with news organizations, he told WIRED. In that case, the disclosures in question were not actually published, rather they were part of a dialogue with a reporter perhaps in an effort to dissuade her or him from publication.

More here:
NSA Mind-Bender: We Wont Tell You What Info We Already Leaked to the Media

Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip32


Read the original here:
Golan v Holder Copyright, the Public Domain, and the First Amendment at the Supreme Court clip32 – Video

FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin

Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by