| Cyborg | | | Designer-Babies | | | Futurism | | | Futurist | | | Immortality | | | Longevity | | | Nanotechnology | | | Post-Human | | | Singularity | | | Transhuman |
Professor Griff VS Obama, Illuminati Exposed
Infowars.com presents our groundbreaking interview with rap artist Professor Griff of Public Enemy. Professor Griff lists Obama's lies, describes why hip hop…
By: westlock420
View post:
Professor Griff VS Obama, Illuminati Exposed – Video
Safe boating is the focus today as rescue demonstrations and boat tours are offered at Channel Islands Harbor.
The 8th annual Boating Expo, located at the U.S. Coast Guard station at 4201 S. Victoria Ave. in Oxnard, is free to the public.
A water rescue of a boat on fire will be performed twice, at 11 a.m. and 2 p.m. Commercial booths and exhibits will also be on display.
Public tours and rides of Coast Guard response boats and cutters will be given until the event ends at 4 p.m.
Local public safety agencies involved in the event include Red Cross, Channel Islands Harbor Patrol, Oxnard Fire Department, Oxnard Police Department and the Navy Sea Cadets.
ALEX JONES And PROFESSOR GRIFF – 21 GOALS Of The ILLUMINATI 1-5
Alex welcomes back Professor Griff to the show. Griff is a member of the hip hop group Public Enemy and head of the Security of the First World. He will talk…
By: danishresistancebopa
View original post here:
ALEX JONES And PROFESSOR GRIFF – 21 GOALS Of The ILLUMINATI 1-5 – Video
Professor Griff on The Illuminati, NWO and Obama
Follow Luke @ http://twitter.com/LukeWeAreChange Luke Rudkowski recently interviewed Professor Griff of Public Enemy about the Illuminati, New World Order, O…
By: wearechange
Go here to read the rest:
Professor Griff on The Illuminati, NWO and Obama – Video
Senator Toomey Speaks On The Public Safety Second Amendment Rights Protection Act
By: sentoomey
See the original post:
Senator Toomey Speaks On The Public Safety
Senators Manchin and Toomey Introduce The Public Safety and Second Amendment Rights Protection Act
By: SenatorJoeManchin
Chris Matthews on Prosecutors Killing: Second Amendment Remedies being Executed on Public Officials
By: YouHotNews
Read the original here:
Chris Matthews on Prosecutors Killing: Second Amendment Remedies being Executed on Public Officials – Video
IRVINE, CA–(Marketwired – Apr 4, 2013) – John Hofmeister, energy and leadership expert, former President of Shell Oil and CEO of Citizens for Affordable Energy, will be joining the Fuel Freedom Foundation Advisory Board.
Fuel Freedom is a non-partisan, non-profit organization dedicated to breaking America’s oil addiction by opening the fuel market to allow replacement fuels like ethanol, methanol, natural gas and electric vehicles to fairly compete with gasoline at the pump. Hofmeister will be joining a high caliber advisory board that includes former Central Intelligence Agency Director, Jim Woolsey, former Rockefeller Foundation President, Peter Goldmark and Co-Director of the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, Gal Luft.
As Shell President, Hofmeister launched an extensive outreach program, unprecedented in the energy industry, to discuss critical global energy challenges. He brings a unique perspective on the oil industry, with over 35 years of experience holding key leadership positions in various Fortune 500 companies.
“Since my retirement from Shell, I have focused a large portion of my time and efforts on educating the public regarding our nation’s dire situation as it relates to oil and the future of energy, specifically transportation fuels. We can’t sustain our transportation needs in the current situation, demand is growing on a global scale, while supply is becoming more and more expensive, and this trend will not stop,” said Hofmeister. “Do we have enough oil to meet demand? Yes. However, not cheap oil. The price of oil, and therefore gas, will continue to grow at crippling rates, because we don’t have enough cheap oil to meet demand inexpensively. This is why I decided to join the Fuel Freedom campaign, they are doing something about these issues, and it complements well my efforts to educate the public and policy makers about pragmatic, non-partisan and affordable energy solutions, including replacements to gasoline and diesel.”
Abundant, domestic and cost-effective supplies of natural gas, together with ethanol, methanol, and electric vehicles could enable American consumers to pay $2 a gallon for fuel if outdated regulations and commercial barriers to competition were removed. Most new cars would require relatively minor upgrades to become flex-fuel cars, and modifications for as little as $100-300 would allow vehicles to optimize replacement fuels such as methanol and ethanol.
“We need a competitor for oil. We need to open the market to replacement fuels like methanol, ethanol and natural gas. Competition will drive transportation fuel prices down, structurally and sustainably. These fuels are well within our reach, we can implement them into our existing system without the need to wait twenty years for fleet turnover,” said Hofmeister. “Fuel Freedom’s approach to opening the fuels market by breaking the oil monopoly is America’s next giant leap forward. It promotes innovation and entrepreneurship, creates new American industry, with new American jobs.”
“We are pleased to welcome Mr. Hofmeister, a true visionary and business leader, to Fuel Freedom Foundation. He brings a wealth of experience and industry knowledge to the table,” said Yossie Hollander, Co-Founder of Fuel Freedom Foundation. “Opening the fuel market will transform our nation for the better. It will make America great again. Replacement fuels will generate millions of jobs in the burgeoning industry of American-made fuels, improve air quality and reduce health risks for our children, enhance our national security, reduce our national and trade deficits and give a much needed boost to our economy.”
Please visit www.fuelfreedom.org to learn more about how you can join Fuel Freedom to get involved and help end America’s addiction to oil.
About Fuel FreedomThe Fuel Freedom Foundation is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to breaking our oil addiction by enabling the transportation fuels market to open so our cars and trucks can run on cheaper, cleaner, healthier American replacement fuels. Consumers could easily convert their cars to run on replacement fuels, but outdated regulations and entrenched commercial interests stand in the way. The Fuel Freedom campaign aims to remove barriers to competition so that natural gas, methanol, ethanol and electricity can compete on equal footing with gasoline at the pump and at the dealership. Achieving Fuel Freedom will lower fuel prices, create jobs, spur economic growth, reduce pollution, and improve national and global security. For more information visit us at www.fuelfreedom.org.
The country’s two main islands could soon also be officially known as Te Ika-a-Maui and Te Waipounamu.The New Zealand Geographic Board Nga Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa Public is consulting the public about whether to formally assign official…
Go here to see the original:
Official Maori names for NZ islands put forward
RALEIGH, N.C.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–
Red Hat, Inc. (RHT), the worlds leading provider of open source solutions, today announced that the Government of the Canary Islands has migrated its virtualized systems from VMware to Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization to meet the growing demands of its IT department. The new infrastructure, based on Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization, JBoss Enterprise Middleware and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, is designed to provide support for the telecommunications, information technology and computer communications infrastructure of the government. The migration improved the consolidation ratios of virtual machines per host and resulted in budget savings of up to 70 percent compared to the costs associated with the previous VMware virtualization platform.
As the Government of the Canary Islands previous virtualization infrastructure could not keep up with the organizations growing workloads, it set two objectives when it came to upgrading it. The first was to promote convergence between horizontal and vertical growth so the government could take its physical machines up to their maximum capacity and thereby reduce the number of hosts, increasing efficiency. The second was to adopt a virtualization solution that could respond to its requirements, reducing cost of ownership as much as possible and minimizing risks in terms of quality of service and future continuity.
Having evaluated its options, the public body found that Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization was more cost-effective and provided greater capacity and improved service levels and continuity. The proposal put forward by Red Hat provided cost savings of up to 70 percent compared with proprietary solutions, while enabling the IT department to adopt a modernization plan, well-suited to the requirements of the Government of the Canary Islands.
Preparing for the future, the government wanted to avoid being tied to providers with unpredictable costs, or to technologies that might not develop or even disappear over time. In these respects, the technological roadmap provided by Red Hat, the capacity that its clients have for influencing that roadmap in a collaborative fashion, the model of annual subscriptions with predictable costs, the fact that it is based on public, open source technology and the soundness of Red Hat as a company were all decisive factors in the choice made by the Government of the Canary Islands.
Once Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization was installed on its IT systems, the government was able to increase from average consolidation ratios of seven virtual machines per physical server (7:1) to 27 virtual machines per host (27:1), in addition to making a saving of 10 percent in disk space, achieving greater reporting capacity and a general simplification of the architecture.
A key factor in this project was teamwork. Red Hat consultants brought significant expertise to bear on the solution and the automation and optimization of the data centre processes. Red Hat partner Qwerty offered the public body the best services at a local level, providing the greatest speed and efficiency possible. Thanks to this, the Government of the Canary Islands was able to successfully migrate a complex virtual infrastructure made up of almost 100 physical servers and 1,000 virtual machines, both Windows and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, in just four months, reducing costs and succeeding in improving operational efficiency and the service provided for citizens, both now and in the future.
Virtualization with Red Hat offers a solid platform, in addition to a clear vision of its roadmap, said Daro Ivn Ortega Valido, computing, telecommunications and new technologies department for the Government of the Canary Islands. Whats more, the budgetary sustainability provided by the Red Hat solutions and the positive results achieved in tests carried out with Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization were of crucial importance when it came to changing our virtualization platform.
Additional Resources
Connect with Red Hat
See the original post:
The Government of the Canary Islands Migrates Telecommunications and New Technologies Platform to Red Hat Enterprise …
But on April 23, 1763, Wilkes over-reached himself with a sustained attack on the Kings Speech for the new parliament, which was considered an unacceptable piece of lse-majest. Wilkes was arrested and charged with seditious libel only to be cleared by sundry juries and re-elected to the Commons on several occasions, even when the authorities tried to bar him from standing. He was a true peoples tribune, and a hero to the Founding Fathers of the United States of America. The free speech provisions in the US constitution, and several subsequent rulings of the American courts, cite the Wilkes case; yet in his native land he is largely forgotten, save when free speech is under threat, as it is now.
Wilkes fought for the right to publish an opinion, however outrageous or erroneous it might be, without being told by people in power what to say or prevented from saying what they did not want to hear. Until relatively recently in this country, this was the accepted state of affairs. By and large, people were free to say what they thought, provided they did not incite violence; state regulation of newspapers was considered anathema.
Yet today, neither is true. People have been arrested and sent to prison for making hateful statements that were not physically threatening. And Parliament, for the first time in 300 years, wants to force the press to subscribe to a set of regulatory structures set up by the state.
The hate laws introduced in recent years are, in reality, the attempted prohibition of ideas that are considered inappropriate because they do not conform to the views we expect to hear expressed in a civilised society. But as long as there is no attempt or intention to provoke violence, should that be a matter for the criminal law? Some take the view that we need laws to protect minority groups from abuse; but the problem is that such laws can also be used to shut down perfectly legitimate opinion, for instance on the rights and wrongs of gay marriage.
There have been attempts to stop this slide. In January, Theresa May announced that it would no longer be an offence under Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 to insult someone. Yet at the same time, the Home Secretary acknowledged that this would make no difference, because the word insulting could safely be removed from the Act without undermining the ability to bring prosecutions.
In other words, this was not a victory for free speech at all, since the various cases that triggered the campaign to repeal this provision (like the arrest of a preacher for saying homosexuality was a sin) would still have gone ahead and will do so in future. The amended statute will allow the police to arrest people on the same basis as before for expressing views that might be considered offensive, but which in a free country they should be allowed to say. That is why, as I argue in my new report for the think-tank Civitas, the relevant section of the Act should be scrapped in its entirety.
We have far too many laws in this area circumscribing free speech not just Labours hate crimes legislation, or the Public Order Act, but also the Communications Act 2003 and the Malicious Communications Act 1988. As a result, the police and prosecutors are able to move from one to the other to close down views deemed to be unacceptable.
The fault here lies with the foe that Wilkes fought, even though he was a member of it: Parliament. The conclusion that the Americans reached when they introduced the First Amendment to the constitution was that the legislature could not be trusted to uphold free speech. It states bluntly that Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. That leaves legislators unable to interfere in any way at all with free speech, whereas here they have done nothing but meddle.
We do not have a written constitution or rather we do not have a constitution that is codified. But as Lord Judge, the Lord Chief Justice, said in an important and insightful speech shortly before the Leveson Inquiry began its work, the fact that there is nothing in statute which states expressly that the independence of the press is a constitutional principle does not diminish the principle. Lord Judge also quoted Wilkes: The liberty of the press is the birthright of a Briton, and is justly esteemed the firmest bulwark of the liberties of this country.
As Lord Judge observed, this was a more profound observation than it at first appears. Wilkes, he said, was asserting that the liberty of the press is the birthright of every citizen, that is, the community as a whole. It is a birthright of the citizen that the press should be independent. It is therefore not a right of one section of the community, not just a sectional right. It is the right of the community as a whole. It is, if you like, our right, the right of every citizen. And that is why, if you accept it as I do, the independence of the press is not only a constitutional necessity, it is a constitutional principle.
Originally posted here:
Parliament has become the worst enemy of free speech
IRVINE, CA–(Marketwire – Mar 28, 2013) – Fuel Freedom Foundation, a nonpartisan, nonprofit campaign dedicated to ending America’s oil addiction through fuel market competition, today announced the launch of its book club and webinar series: “Fueling the Future.”
Fuel Freedom Foundation advocates for an open fuel market so that cheaper, cleaner, American-made replacement fuels may compete fairly with gasoline at the pump. Competition will drive down transportation fuel prices, create jobs and promote innovation. By commercializing cheaper, cleaner and domestically produced replacement fuels, we can pave the way to freedom of choice for all consumers, strengthen the economy, relieve families from the burden of high gas prices, secure our nation from oil-producing adversarial countries and significantly reduce harmful air toxins.
The “Fueling the Future” book club and webinar series is part of a national effort to inform the public of the key issues surrounding America’s oil dependency and to motivate public participation and discussion. The book club program will feature relevant, timely and thought-provoking book selections throughout the year. We have established a book club forum that provides members the opportunity to collaborate with like-minded individuals, initiate discussions with members of their community and pose questions to leading industry experts.
Following the book reading and forum discussion, participants are invited to attend a webinar featuring the book’s authors. In addition to the book club webinars, Fuel Freedom will host a variety of other webinars with industry professionals, energy experts and political leaders to discuss the feasibility of flex-fuel vehicles, the cost-benefit of alternative fuels and the positive macro-economic impact of oil independence.
“We are storming into the national energy debate as American family budgets are being clobbered, yet again, by the high cost of oil. In an effort to influence and alter the national dialogue, our education and outreach programs, including the book club and webinar series, offer lively and engaging conversations and an opportunity to connect with members of your community and industry professionals all in one place. It is a platform to exchange ideas, learn about current events from energy experts and most importantly, to get a sense of the devastating consequences of our oil addiction and the viable replacements that offer a solution,” said Ann Norman, Fuel Freedom Foundation vice president of communications.
The Foundation’s current book selection is “Petropoly: The Collapse of America’s Energy Security Paradigm.” In a no-holds-barred, fast-paced, information-packed sequel to “Turning Oil into Salt: Energy Independence through Fuel Choice,” energy experts and co-directors of the Institute for Analysis of Global Security (IAGS), Gal Luft and Anne Korin, spell out the pitfalls of an oil market dominated by a cartel.
The Washington Times said, “Ms. Korin and Mr. Luft’s thinking is rooted in science, economics and politics and they display intellectual equity to other points of view that is refreshing and clarifying.” The National Review calls the book “a muscular case for a Teddy Roosevelt-style solution: trust-busting.” The webinar for “Petropoly,” featuring Luft and Korin, will be held April 8, 2013 at 7 p.m. EDT.
“We believe the public would be interested to learn that simple, inexpensive modifications would enable most new vehicles on the road today to utilize readily available, abundant supplies of cost-effective replacement fuels, such as natural gas, methanol and ethanol. Fuel Freedom Foundation strongly believes in educating the public about the viability of replacement fuels and these newly formulated programs are one way of doing so. Fueling the Future promises to be an exciting, enlightening and valuable series. Only by addressing the problems with oil head-on can we find and enact solutions to free us of our dangerous oil addiction,” said Fuel Freedom Foundation co-founder Yossie Hollander.
Please visit www.fuelfreedom.org/book-club to learn more about how you can join the Fueling the Future conversation, get involved, and help end America’s addiction to oil.
About Fuel FreedomFuel Freedom Foundation is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to breaking the U.S. economy’s oil addiction by powering cars and trucks with cheaper, cleaner, healthier American replacement fuels. Consumers could easily convert their cars from running on gasoline to replacement fuels, but outdated regulations and entrenched commercial interests stand in the way. The Fuel Freedom campaign works to remove barriers to competition so that natural gas, methanol, ethanol and electricity can compete on equal footing with gasoline at the pump and the dealership. Achieving Fuel Freedom will lower fuel prices, create jobs, spur economic growth, reduce pollution, and improve national and global security. For more information go to the Foundation’s website at www.fuelfreedom.org; Facebook: FuelFreedomFoundation; and Twitter: @FuelFreedomNow.
Original post:
Fuel Freedom Foundation Launches Book Club and Webinar Series
Professor Griff: 21 Goals of The Illuminati
Alex welcomes back Professor Griff to the show. Griff is a member of the hip hop group Public Enemy and head of the Security of the First World. He will talk…
By: TheAlexJonesChannel
See the original post:
Professor Griff: 21 Goals of The Illuminati – Video
WASHINGTON (AP) — More than 4 out of 5 Americans want to prepare now for rising seas and stronger storms from climate change, a new national survey says. But most are unwilling to keep spending money to restore and protect stricken beaches.
The poll by Stanford University released Thursday found that only 1 in 3 people favored the government spending millions to construct big sea walls, replenish beaches or pay people to leave the coast.
This was the first time a large national poll looked at how Americans feel about adapting to the changes brought on by global warming, said survey director Jon Krosnick, a professor of political science and psychology at Stanford.
The more indirect options the majority preferred were making sure new buildings were stronger and reducing future coastal development. New building codes rated the highest with 62 percent of those surveyed favoring it.
Three in 5 people want those who are directly affected by rising seas to pay for protection, rather than all taxpayers.
Krosnick said the low favorability of sea walls and sand replenishment “reflect the public’s fatalistic sense that it’s more realistic to just give up the beach than to try to save it when other storms in the future will just wash it away again.”
The nationally representative survey of 1,174 Americans conducted online by GfK Custom Research has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.9 percentage points.
University of Miami geology professor Harold Wanless, who wasn’t involved in the survey, said he was at a Miami Beach meeting on Thursday with business and political leaders on how to try to keep from losing their “hugely expensive” land. But they are afraid of spending money in vain attempts that won’t work.
There are three ways the public can deal with the effects of rising seas on beaches, said coastal geology professor S. Jeffress Williams of the University of Hawaii. He is an expert on sea level rise and methods of adapting to it. You can “hold the line” with expensive sea walls, retreat and leave the beach, or compromise with sand dunes and beach replenishing.
Sand dunes helped protect the New Jersey town of Seaside Park more than its dune-less neighbor Seaside Heights when Superstorm Sandy hit last fall, said Laurie Mcgilvray, a government coastline science expert.
Texas Press Association proclaimed Rep. Todd Hunter, R-Corpus Christi, a Friend of the First Amendment” at the TPA Legislative Conference on Feb. 25 in honor of his years of hard work and determination to protect and preserve free speech and government transparency.
In presenting the award, the association released the following statement:
Rep. Hunter is serving his seventh term in the Texas House of Representatives. He is senior partner at the law firm of Hunter and Handel in Corpus Christi, and he also carries senior-level clout in the Texas House, where he serves as chairman of the powerful Calendars Committee, which determines when and how legislation will be considered. Rep. Hunter also serves as a member of the House committees for Redistricting, for General Investigating and Ethics, for County Affairs, and for the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
Rep. Hunter is a strong advocate for published public notice and for government transparency in all forms. He was instrumental in the passage of the landmark bill protecting reporter’s privilege in the 81st legislative session. At the time, Rep. Hunter was chair of the Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence Committee. Without his requiring the district attorneys to sit down with Texas newspapers to have a discussion about the issues, and without his extraordinary mediation capabilities, neither the meeting nor the bill would have come to pass. He oversaw four different sessions with the district attorneys one of which lasted for more than 10 hours. This was the third time the bill had been brought before the Legislature in recent history, and without Rep. Hunter, it would not have made it out of the House.
In the next session, he took on an even bigger issue one that impacts all citizens in the state of Texas who are sued out of retaliation for speaking out. Rep. Hunter championed the anti-SLAPP statute (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation), which was passed unanimously in both chambers and went into immediate effect. As a result, retaliatory lawsuits are coming to an early end and cases that are dismissed through the anti-SLAPP statute include an award of attorneys fees. The hope is that the anti-SLAPP law will serve as a deterrent to retaliatory lawsuits even being filed in the future.
This session, Rep. Hunter has agreed to sponsor a bill that will give newspapers an opportunity to correct mistakes that may have been made and not be liable for exemplary damages once we make those corrections. The bill should greatly reduce the frequency and the cost of First Amendment litigation, giving newspapers a chance to address concerns on the front end and avoid costly lawsuits later.
Rep. Hunter is also carrying the bill on government officials texting about public business during public meetings and the bill to expand the Public Information Act to cover electronic communications and third-party contracts.
Texas newspapers are fortunate to have a First Amendment and open government champion with the standing, reputation and effectiveness of Rep. Hunter. The Texas Press Association is grateful for his steadfast support of open government and his service to Texas.
Originally posted here:
Texas Press Association honors Rep. Hunter with First Amendment Award
Lyle Denniston looks at the Bob Woodward controversy, and if President Obamas administration is testing the First Amendment in its relationship with journalists.
When the president can bypass media to reach the public, it is not far-fetched to imagine a timeperhaps now?when the state controls the message. No president since Richard Nixon has demonstrated such overt contempt for the messenger. And, thanks to technological advances in social media, Obama has been able to bypass traditional watchdogs as no other has.
Kathleen Parker, a columnist with the Washington Post Writers Group, in an op-ed article in The Washington Post on March 1, titled Why the threat on Bob Woodward matters. She was commenting on the tiff between the White House and Post senior writer Woodward over his story saying that the White House originated the idea of the massive federal budget cuts that took effect March 1.
checkThe watchdog role of the press is, indeed, one of the political values that the First Amendments free press clause was designed to achieve, from the very beginning of the nation. As Thomas Jefferson wrote to a friend in 1789, Our liberty depends on the freedom of the press, and that cannot be limited without being lost.
It is fair to ask, though, whether a presidents choice to go to the people because the White House believes the presidential message is not getting through via the media is a serious limit on freedom of the press. The press depends upon access to White House officials to monitor their official conduct, but that is an issue quite separate from a chief executive who goes out on the hustings to tell his administrations story the way he wants it told.
The logical fallacy in Kathleen Parkers column is that it treats President Obamas speechmaking tours as merely an extension of a threat (or an implied threat) to cut off reporter Woodwards access to the White House (leaving aside the hyperbole suggesting that America is nearor even atthe place where the government controls the message).
There are two kinds of accountability at issue here, and both are related to constitutional purposes. Those who wrote the Constitution wanted the president to function as the one government official who was accountable to the whole nation, because he was elected to do just that. They turned aside suggestions that the president be chosen by Congress, and opted for election by the people. And those who added the First Amendment to the Constitution wanted the press to help ensure that the president remained true to that constitutional stewardship.
From George Washingtons time onward, presidents have used the high visibility of their office to communicate to the people. They have not always communicated honestly and candidly, but by the very fact that they are speaking or writing in public makes their message subject to criticism, from the press and their political adversaries, and by the public at large.
The fact that the means of expression have changed over timethe penny press, the telegraph, urban newspapers, radio, television, and the Internet and social mediahas not meant that the president was steadily gaining the unchecked power to control the message. Presidents have had press secretaries who daily met with reporters to make announcements and field questions, but no one expects the reporters to suspend their own professional judgment in response.
None of that has altered the constitutional order in a way that has scuttled the First Amendment, or muzzled the press. A journalist like Bob Woodward has managed to get behind the scenes to a really unusual degree, for some of the most penetrating Washington journalism that America has ever known. Although in recent days he has publicly communicated his discomfort with being a target of White House criticism and what he interpreted as a threat, it hardly seems likely that he will now be isolated from the public square, or that he will be truly intimidated.
Read the rest here:
Constitution Check: Does it violate the First Amendment for the president to bypass the press?
How free speech can get you fired
How free speech can get you fired tatoott1009.com update 3/3/2013 The system hopes to use the public's ignorance to restrict the 2nd Amendment. Joe Biden Says Women Need a Shot Gun Not An AR15 tatoott1009.com Sandy Hook Shooting: Active-Shooter Drill Confirmed by Law Enforcement Raises Suspicion of False Flag Operation tatoott1009.com WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON HERE Sandy Hook Elementary School Tribute Newtown, Saturday, November 10, 2012 11:36 AM .avi tatoott1009.com SANDY HOOK ~ “I'm Sorry Governor, WHAT DID YOU SAY ???” youtu.be Raw Helicopter Footage Sandy Hook youtu.be Sandy Hook?????????? Crisis Actors Trained Players and Actors Making It Real tatoott1009.com update 12/21/2012– 27 Killed in Connecticut Shooting, Including 20 Children FALSE FLAG 2 Years In The Making – Newtown CT tatoott1009.com Copy this below and share it with EVERYONE you know! District of Columbia Act of 1871 tatoott1009.com WWIII Is Coming Soon Here's Why!? tatoott1009.com
By: Tatoott1009Reloaded
Posted on February 25, 2013, Monday
BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN: Pehin Orang Kaya Indera Pahlawan Dato Seri Setia Awang Hj Suyoi bin Hj Osman, the Minister of Development, has called on the public to fulfil the responsibility of throwing rubbish in proper trash bins and make sure that recreational places are kept clean after participating in a cleanup at Tungku Beach, where the minister saw rubbish being disposed of indiscriminately, Borneo Bulletin reported.
The minister spoke to the media on the sidelines of the cleaning campaign at the beach that also involved more than 200 students from the Eco Clubs of eight schools. The event was held in conjunction with Brunei Darussalams 29th National Day.
While picking up rubbish lying around the beach, the minister said, We want to send a strong message that its everyones responsibility to clean up the beaches after they use the facilities. We want to cultivate awareness among our beach-goers and public to clean up the rubbish.
There is a limit to what we can do, the rest we are relying on the public to do their part in maintaining the cleanliness at recreational venues like beaches.
When asked if there was a lack of rubbish bins at beaches, the minister replied, This maybe one of the reasons but the idea is that for people who usethe beaches would collect their rubbish and take them away. We hope to provide more garbage bins to encourage the public to throw their rubbish in the bins instead of throwing the rubbish everywhere.
Noticing that rubbish is also scattered around the garbage bins, Pehin Dato Awang Hj Suyoi said he was saddened by the action of some irresponsible individuals who continue to throw the rubbish outside rubbish bins and said these people dont care about the environment.
The fight for cleaner environment, he said is a long fight and we are starting it from the young kids through the Eco Clubs.
We can instil a responsible attitude of throwing rubbish properly among the youths and send the right message to the public. The Eco Clubs are active and they are part of our activities. We are thankful for their participation today, he added.
Eco Clubs are established in schools and higher learning institutions and are registered with the Department of Environment, Parks and Recreation. The function of the clubs is to provide exposure to students on environmental issues and serve as a platform to contribute ideas towards the preservation and conservation of the countrys environment.
Excerpt from:
Keeping beaches clean is publics responsibility
One resident said she was “dumbfounded” when a New Britain Borough Council member presented a resolution to “preserve” the Second Amendment.
“Why is this on the council agenda at all?” Robyne Kelemen remembered thinking.
Councilwoman Mary Pat Holewinski presented the proposed resolution earlier this month, but it was tabled after some questioned its purpose and intent.
The resolution is expected to be considered again at the council’s March 12 meeting.
Explaining why she wanted the resolution, Holewinski said, “When I was elected and sworn in, I swore to uphold the U.S. Constitution and the Pennsylvania Constitution. I introduced it as a means for borough council to show support for the Constitution.”
The resolution calls for supporting both the U.S. Constitution’s amendment and Pennsylvania’s, both of which assert the public’s right to bear arms.
It continues, saying all existing gun regulations are “reasonable and adequate” to protect the public and any further gun laws would be illegal without a constitutional amendment.
“New Britain Borough strongly objects to the passage of any new law or regulation … that infringes upon Second Amendment rights,” the resolution states.
It also “demands” that all elected and appointed officials of the federal and state government uphold their oaths and honor citizens’ right to “keep and bear arms.”
The measure has both supporters and critics.
Visit link:
New Britain considering Second Amendment resolution
ILLUMINATI OSCARS 2013
Alien Contactee warns the public that there may be some Illuminati symbolism at the oscars tomorrow and how the Oscars is a celebration of the global elite's brainwashing of the masses.
By: TheAlienContactee
View post:
ILLUMINATI OSCARS 2013 – Video
FireFox!
Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting
Advertise Here $10 a Month
Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin
|
Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum
|