Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman

Malala Yousafzai Accepts the 2014 Liberty Medal
Malala Yousafzai's acceptance speech at the 2014 Liberty Medal Ceremony at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia on October 21, 2014. Award presented by Jeffrey Rosen, President…

By: ConstitutionCenter

Go here to read the rest:
Malala Yousafzai Accepts the 2014 Liberty Medal – Video

Zuma reaffirms freedom of expression in SA
20 October 2014 – President Jacob Zuma has reaffirmed the country's commitment to freedom of expression, 37 years since so-called Black Wednesday. He met members of the media in Pretoria on…

By: eNCAnews

Excerpt from:
Zuma reaffirms freedom of expression in SA – Video

MIAMI (PRWEB) October 22, 2014

More than 900 physicians researchers and regenerative medicine experts from around the world attended the First International Symposium on Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine, held in Buenos Aires, Argentina Oct. 2-4, 2014.

The event, hosted by Global Stem Cells Group in partnership with Julio Ferreira, M.D., President of the South American Academy Cosmetic Surgery, offered an opportunity for many of the worlds most respected authorities on stem cell and regenerative medicine to showcase advancements in research and therapies on a global level.

An interdisciplinary team of leading international stem cell experts provided a full day of high-level scientific lectures geared to medical professionals. Pioneers and luminaries in stem cell medicine who served as featured speakers at the event included:

Lord David Harrell, PhD., a scientific leader recognized nationally, internationally recognized expert in neuroscience and regenerative medicine and a member of the Global Stem Cells Group Advisory Board spoke on spoke on the cellular composition of bone marrow with a focus on stem and progenitor cell activities of bone marrow stem and progenitor cells.

Joseph Purita, M.D., Director of The Institute of Regenerative and Molecular Orthopedics in Boca Raton, Florida, member of the Global Stem Cells Group Advisory Board and a pioneer in the use of stem cells and platelet rich plasma for a variety of orthopedic conditions, spoke about the use of PRP and stem cell injections for treatment of musculoskeletal conditions. He detailed cutting-edge treatments he now offers to his clinic patients, including extensive use of platelet-rich plasma in conjunction with bone marrow stem cells (BMAC), adipose stem cells (SVF) and fat grafts.

Vasilis Paspaliaris, M.D., CEO of Adistem, Ltd., a member of the Global Stem Cells Group Advisory Board and a thought-leading and highly experienced clinical pharmacologist and medical scientist discussed the proven differences in efficacy between the mesenchyme stem cells (MSCs) of a young donor and those of an aging donor, primarily due to the younger donor cells ability to secrete more trophic factors.

According to Benito Novas, Global Stem Cells Group CEO, the world-class event was well received at a time when the field of regenerative medicine is on the verge of changing medical science forever.

We wanted the symposium to help clear up old misconceptions and change outdated attitudes by educating people on the wide range of illnesses and injuries stem cell therapies are already treating and curing, Novas says. We set out to establish a dialogue between researchers and practitioners in order to help move stem cell therapies from the lab to the physicians office and I believe we achieved our goals with this symposium.

Our objective is to open a dialogue among the worlds medical and scientific communities in order to advance stem cell technologies and translate them into point-of-care medical practices.

See the article here:
More than 900 Physicians Converge on Buenos Aires for Global Stem Cells Groups First International Symposium on Stem …

Building the Liberty Movement
What makes for a successful movement in favor of liberty and reason? Alexander McCobin, Co-Founder and President of the hugely successful Students for Libert…

By: Atlas Society

Go here to read the rest:
Building the Liberty Movement – Video

State legislators are concerned about Second Amendment rights so much so that the Senate has passed a bill that would prohibit local regulation of firearms or ammunition.

State Senate President Pro Tempore Joe Scarnati, R-Brockway, announced Friday that the senate passed House Bill 80 by a vote of 34 to 14 on Thursday.

State Rep. Martin Causer, R-Turtlepoint, said he supports the bill that would put a stop to local laws or ordinances attempting to regulate firearms or ammunition.

Now the bill is in the hands of the state House of Representatives following Thursdays vote.

I think its very much needed, Causer said, who was a co-sponsor of the original House Bill.

Causer said the measure promotes uniformity in regards to firearms across Pennsylvania. People traveling throughout the state would not have to worry about local gun laws being different.

Scarnati says the legislation would protect Pennsylvanians Second Amendment rights.

This legislation is a commonsense measure to not change, but simply clarify current law, Scarnati said. Senate Bill 80 clarifies existing law to ensure that firearms and ammunition laws are consistent across Pennsylvania.

There has never been such an issue across the region, Causer said, but he sees a problem in southern Pennsylvania, especially Philadelphia.

Causer said the bill would let an individual or organization sue to block or overturn a local ordinance. If successful, the individual would be able to recoup expenses, including attorney fees, costs, and lost income from employment, according to Scarnati.

Go here to see the original:
Senate passes bill prohibiting local firearm regulations

BRUSSELS NATO said Thursday it saw no sign of any significant Russian pullback from Ukraines border, despite President Vladimir Putin ordering thousands of troops to withdraw ahead of truce talks.

We would welcome the withdrawal of Russian troops on the border with Ukraine, as this would be a step in the right direction. But for the moment, we have not seen major and significant movements yet, a NATO official told AFP.

The Kremlin said on Saturday that Putin had ordered the pullback of 17,600 servicemen who had participated in summer drills in the southern Rostov region on the border with Ukraine.

The order came ahead of key talks between Putin, Ukranian President Petro Poroshenko and European leaders in Milan on Friday on the fragile truce in the former Soviet country.

But the Nato official said: There is still a large and capable force sitting on the border of Ukraine and heavy equipment still has to be pulled back.

As NATO leaders made clear at the Wales summit (in September), Russia must end its support for militants in eastern Ukraine, withdraw its troops and stop its military activities along and across the border with Ukraine.

Read the original post:
NATO sees no sign of major Russian pullback from Ukraine border

THESSALONIKI, Greece (AP) NATO’s top military commander said Wednesday that the alliance would welcome the withdrawal of Russian troops from a Russian region bordering Ukraine, but that it has seen no “major movement” so far.

On Saturday Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered about 17,600 Russian troops to return to their bases from Rostov. The region in Russia borders east Ukraine, where pro-Russian insurgents have been battling government troops since April.

“We would welcome withdrawal of troops on that border, and we are anxiously watching what is happening,” U.S. Air Force Gen. Philip Breedlove, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe, told The Associated Press on the sidelines of a NATO conference in the northern Greek city of Thessaloniki.

“We have not seen major movements yet,” he said. “Now we will watch to see if there is delivery on the promise.”

Russia has consistently denied Ukrainian and Western claims that it has supported the insurgency in eastern Ukraine with weapons, expertise and fighters, saying troops stationed in Rostov are participating in drills.

NATO has countered previous Russian claims of troop withdrawals. In the spring, the U.S. and NATO said Russia had deployed about 40,000 troops near the border, though Putin ordered the troops back to their home bases in late May. While the U.S. and NATO did confirm those moves, in August they said Moscow was again bolstering its forces in the region and that Russia had allowed troops and vehicles to cross the border to assist the separatists.

“Actions speak louder than words,” another top NATO military commander, Gen. Frank Gorenc, who heads the alliance’s air command and the U.S. Air Forces in Europe, told the AP. “And the fact of the matter is, in today’s environment strategic messaging without action are just words. And so their actions remain to be seen.”

Breedlove noted it was important for the West to comprehend the possible motives for Russia’s actions in Ukraine.

“We have to understand in the West that Mr. Putin may actually have felt threatened along the lines of Ukraine leaning to the West, both in the European union and in the NATO alliance,” Breedlove said.

Putin has repeatedly accused the U.S., the EU and NATO of stonewalling Moscow’s economic and security concerns and trying to pull Ukraine into the Western orbit. He accused the West of encouraging the ouster of Ukraine’s former president in February, and cast the annexation of Crimea the following month as a necessary move to protect Russian speakers there.

Read the original post:
NATO Chief: No Russian Withdrawal From Ukraine Border

Ryan Johnson's Opening and Closing Comments at Life Liberty Property Summit
Ryan Johnson, President of the Missouri Alliance for Freedom, delivers the opening and closing comments at the Life Liberty Property Summit in Jefferson City, Missouri on October 4, 2014.

By: Missouri Alliance for Freedom

See more here:
Ryan Johnson’s Opening and Closing Comments at Life Liberty Property Summit – Video

Putin Russia and liberty – euspectator reports
Eu spectator based in Brussels covers a musical event entitled “Music of Hope” which sought to draw attention to the oppressive regime of President Vladimir Putin's Russian Federation, expressed…

By: euspectator

Go here to read the rest:
Putin Russia and liberty – euspectator reports – Video

Liberty Tax, Inc. , the parent company of Liberty Tax Service, announced today that Robert Lougen has been named Vice President of Operations.

See the original post:
Liberty Tax Service Names Robert Lougen as Vice President of Operations


Headed for a “shirt-front”: President Vladimir Putin and Prime Minister Tony Abbott. Photo: Alex Ellinghausen

Has the world ever encountered such a pair as Abbott and Putin (“Australians were murdered … I am going to shirt-front Mr Putin”, October 14)? They seem to be a unique breed of testosto-Illuminati those who are mysteriously inspired by their testosterone. I think that truly, once they sort through their posturing, they’ll realise how deep their affection is for each other. Bring on the G20 bromance of 2014.

Catherine HoskinPennant Hills

Many Australians would probably be happy for Tony Abbott to confront Vladimir Putin about the loss of life of passengers on flight MH17, but talk of “shirt-fronting” isn’t the talk we expect of a leader, let alone a prime minister. Grow up Abbott. Speak and represent us appropriately.

Illustration: John Shakespeare

Paul Parramore Sawtell


Russian-backed rebels murdered 38 Australians. The Prime Minister’s tough words about Putin were inspirational and showed great leadership. But where is the tough talk from the other world leaders who lost so many in the MH17 tragedy? The Russian President must be laughing at their weakness. Full marks also to the Opposition Leader for refusing to meet Vladimir Putin.

Phil Johnson Dee Why

View post:
Tony Abbott and Vladimir Putin were made for each other


Posted Oct 14, 2014 by Raymond Fang

The committee established last month by President Robert Zimmer to review the Universitys free speech policy was created due to free speech-related incidents at other universities around the country, committee head Geoffrey Stone said. The committee will send its recommendations to the Faculty Council by the end of 2014.

According to a University-wide e-mail from Zimmer on September 25, the committee will draft a statement reflecting the Universitys commitment to and tolerance of multiple forms of free expression.

The committee began meeting last month and will release its statement on free speech on January 1, 2015, after which the statement will head to the Faculty Council for a vote during winter quarter. Zimmer selected Stone, along with the other committee members, for their diverse fields of study, their well-respected status in the University, and for their judgment, which, according to Stone, Zimmer thought well of.

Stone said that Zimmers decision to form an updated statement on the Universitys free speech policy was unrelated to anything specific that occurred at the University.

I think what triggered it was more the fact that issues have arisen in universities across the nation in the last couple of years, and we didnt have a formal statement on policy on these issues, he said. The president thought it would be useful to have one, but it was not triggered by anything in particular at Chicago.

Stone speculated that cancellations of convocation speakers and reactions to student protests at other universities might have been the cause for the committee.

My guess is Zimmer talked with other university presidents and they were wrestling with some of these questions, and he realized it would be a good thing for the University to think about this and come up with general principles that would help guide discussion when such issues arise in the future, Stone said.

The Universitys neutrality policy, the Kalven Report, sets a precedent for the current committees work. The Kalven Report was produced in the 1960s by a similar committee headed by Law Professor Harry Kalven, Jr. as a response to student protests at the University and across the country. It proclaims an official University policy of neutrality on social and political issues.

Originally posted here:
Stone to update free speech policy

A U.S. army soldier, center, takes his position at the site of a suicide attack in Kabul, Afghanistan, Monday, Oct. 13, 2014. An Afghan official said a suicide bomber targeting a NATO convoy in Kabul killed one civilian and wounded three others. (AP Photo/Massoud Hossaini)

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) A mountain ambush by Taliban fighters killed at least 14 Afghan security force troops, authorities said Monday, as villagers elsewhere in the country alleged a NATO airstrike that the coalition said targeted militants actually killed civilians.

The fighting in Sari Pul province, as well as the disputed NATO airstrike in eastern Paktia province, show the serious challenges facing new Afghan President Ashraf Ghani Ahmadzai. Former President Hamid Karzai repeatedly clashed with NATO forces over civilian casualties from airstrikes, straining relations as public anger against the coalition grew.

The ambush in Sari Pul, where Taliban fighters reportedly have been massing for days, happened Sunday in its Kohistanat district. There, militants opened fire on an Afghan Army unit heading back to the capital after several months being deployed there, killing 12 soldiers and two police officers, said Kazim Kenhan, a spokesman for the provincial police chief.

Kenhan said 13 troops and four police officers were wounded and six troops are missing after the ambush there, some 340 kilometers (210 miles) northwest of the capital, Kabul.

“A very intensive gun battle is going on right now and the casualty number might change overnight,” Kenhan said Monday. “It is a mountainous area and very difficult to reach. We do need air support as we requested from the international forces, but they didn’t help us.”

In Paktia province, hundreds of villagers protested over their allegation that a NATO airstrike killed seven civilians in an operation NATO said killed “eight armed enemy combatants.”

The protesters brought seven corpses to the governor’s office there, claiming they were civilians killed Sunday during a NATO airstrike in a mountainous area on the outskirts of the city of Gardez. The villagers said the strike targeted eight people collecting firewood and left one man wounded.

“From the evidence it seems that all seven who have been killed in the airstrike of the coalition forces are civilians, but this needs to be investigated more to find out why and how this incident has happened,” said Abdul Wali Sahee, deputy provincial governor of Paktia province.

Sahee said that there was a dead body of a 12-year-old boy among those brought to the provincial capital.

Continue reading here:
Afghans allege NATO airstrike kills 7 civilians

The criminal action taken by South Korean prosecutors against a former Seoul bureau chief of Japans Sankei Shimbun daily on the charge that his column posted online in August defamed President Park Geun-hye raises serious questions about the countrys commitment to freedom of the press. It could border on abuse of power if the South Korean investigators are using the charge of libel against a public figure like the president selectively on members of the media that are critical of her administration.

The column in question quoted rumors originally reported in the South Korean media and circulating in the financial industry that Park was with a man during the seven hours when her whereabouts was unconfirmed on April 16 the day the passenger ferry Sewol sank and killed more than 300 people, mostly teenagers on a school trip. The writer, Tatsuya Kato, was indicted Oct. 8 without being detained. He had been questioned three times by the prosecutors and banned from leaving the country since early August even though he was relieved of his position as bureau chief as of Oct. 1.

The Seoul prosecutors charge that Katos column defamed Parks reputation by carrying information without the minimum backup reporting necessary to support its validity.

The presidents office says Park was inside the presidential compound during the hours in question. The prosecutors were acting on a criminal complaint filed by a local conservative civic group against the article, but it would be safe to assume that the administration was behind the push for the indictment, given that a senior official of the presidents office said earlier that the South Korean authorities would pursue civil and criminal charges against the journalist.

When South Korea was under the rule of a succession of military dictators until the 1980s, people could be punished for defamation of the state by criticizing those in power.

Although such a law was abolished in the countrys subsequent democratization, certain restrictions linger on freedom of thought and expression, such as a national security law that can subject people to penalties for praising North Korea, which Seoul deems as illegally occupying the northern half of the peninsula.

There is reportedly criticism that the Park administration is also using the libel charge as a tool not only against members of the media but also against opposition lawmakers and lawyers that are critical of the government.

That no criminal action has been taken against or investigations made of Chosun Ilbo, a leading conservative South Korean newspaper that originally reported the rumors, has raised the question of whether the investigators selectively targeted the Japanese daily, which takes a position critical of the Park administration on many of the disputes between Japan and South Korea.

Sankei, which strongly protested and called for retraction of the action by the Seoul prosecutors, has said that the column was not meant to defame the president but to serve the publics interest by reporting on the developments in South Korea concerning the top government leaders whereabouts on the day the major accident took place.

Maximum restraint is urged on the use of defamation charges by those in power since such an action can be considered discretionary as a way of intimidating the people and organizations that criticize them.

See the article here:
Freedom of the press in South Korea

SEO Scholars - Video

SEO Comments Off
Oct 122014

SEO Scholars
William Goodloe, President:SEO Scholars and Jessica Cogan, Regional Director:SEO Scholars San Francisco. Aired 10/05/14.

By: CBS SF Bay Area

Read the rest here:
SEO Scholars – Video

The Faroe Islands, part of the Kingdom of Denmark, wont observe European Union sanctions the country says make no economic sense as its fish farmers predict a surge in exports to Russia.

I have a responsibility to my people and I dont believe in boycotts, Home Rule Prime Minister Kaj Leo Holm Johannesen said yesterday in a phone interview. They always end up hurting the wrong people.

The north Atlantic archipelago, settled by Norse Vikings, has stayed outside the European Union and, unlike non-EU member Norway, has ignored the sanctions against Russia. That means it hasnt been hit by President Vladimir Putins retaliatory trade ban. Bakkafrost P/F (BAKKA), based in the Faroese town of Glyvrar, predicted last month the development will more than triple its fish exports to Russia.

Criticism from abroad has been very muted, 50-year-old Johannesen said. Ive explained the situation to Brussels, to Danish lawmakers and to the Obama administration when I traveled to Washington and New York recently.

Danish Foreign Minister Martin Lidegaard said he doesnt want to be the umpire in this matter, in a brief interview today. Its no crime not to be a member of the EU nor is it a crime not to be the subject of a boycott. On the other hand, its clear that the EU expects that others dont take advantage of the situation to capture market from countries impacted by the boycott.

A fishing boat unloads its catch at the dock in Klaksvik, the second largest city in the Faroe Islands. Close

A fishing boat unloads its catch at the dock in Klaksvik, the second largest city in the Faroe Islands.


A fishing boat unloads its catch at the dock in Klaksvik, the second largest city in the Faroe Islands.

Russia, which accounts for about 7 percent of global Atlantic salmon demand, imposed its food ban on countries backing sanctions at the beginning of August. The standoff has left the Faroes, which supply about 4 percent of world output, in a unique position to provide Russians with fresh salmon.

View original post here:
Ignoring Putin Boycott Brings Cash Reward to Faroe Islanders

Episode 3

Freedom Comments Off
Oct 092014

The IRS letters that went out to politically-active nonprofit groups in 2010 and kicked up a House investigation two years later have fallen out of the headlines but they just might be havingan impact on this year’s midterms.

Billionaire oil executives David and Charles Koch are now relying on Freedom Partners Action Fund, a new super-PAC, to run political commercials, while their nonprofit,Americans for Prosperity, has gone dark.

The shift in television ad buying occurred on Sept. 5, which was precisely60 days from the general election and a date that triggers additional disclosure rules for nonprofits such as AFP. The group did air political advertisements within that 60-day window in 2012, funding950 network and national cable spots in House and Senate races and 2,208 spots in the presidential, according to Kantar Media’s CMAG data. Of course, that was before the Internal Revenue Service letters scrutinizing the political activity of so-called charitable groups and ensuing scandal became public.

By shifting ad spending to a super-PAC, the Kochs won’tneed to worry about whether the IRS decides to amend disclosure rules, impose new limits on campaign-related activities or if any of the ongoing legal battles trigger changes. “All these groups have to consider what that IRS might construe as political,” said David Keating, the president of the Center for Competitive Politics, a conservative organization that is challenging campaign finance regulations.

The IRS flap was a “minor factor” in the decision to shift roles, according to a source familiar with AFP. Another driver, according to the source, was a reassessment of strategy after taking electoral losses in 2012 that included spending money earlier in the election cycle.

The move also puts the best-known Koch group further from thepublic eyeat least for the time-being. The Koch brothers have come under withering attacks from the left, with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid excoriating them as “un-American” from the Senate floor while theAFL-CIO has launched a media campaign focused on “The Koch” sisterstwo women who are supposed to represent a counter-point to David and Charles Koch.

We’ll continue with a strong push through the elections.

James Davis, Freedom Partners Action Fund

Freedom Partners Action Fund began appearing on disclaimers for television spots in Arkansas, Iowa and Oregon on Sept. 5, according theCMAG data. That dayAFP, which ran ads for most of this year, pulleddown all of their commercials, the data shows.

Go here to read the rest:
Episode 3

NATO Secretary General – Joint Press Point with Polish President, 06 OCT 2014
Joint press point by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg and the President of Poland Bronisaw Komorowski. Warsaw, Poland – Monday 6 October 2014.


Read more:
NATO Secretary General – Joint Press Point with Polish President, 06 OCT 2014 – Video

By Brock Vergakis The Associated Press October 7, 2014


Members of NATO’s military committee began meeting in Virginia on Tuesday to get an update from the alliance’s only command in North America and discuss the creation of a quick-reaction force in Europe.

Officials from the military committee are visiting NATO’s Allied Command Transformation through Wednesday.

The Norfolk-based command serves as a type of think tank for the alliance and looks for ways to address current and emerging threats impacting the 28-nation alliance. The committee’s visit to the command occurs once a year. While the discussions are classified, NATO officials said they would focus on developments from a recent NATO summit in Wales, an initiative that calls for interoperable forces as well as the planned quick-reaction force that’s intended to counter Russian aggression in eastern Europe.

“We must make sure that all the nations are aligned with those projects and this is a unique occasion we have to do that in a very open, very frank manner,” said French Air Force General Jean Paul-Palomeros, NATO ACT’s supreme commander.

Details of the quick-reaction force will be worked out in February at a NATO ministerial meeting, but it is expected to consist of 4,000 to 5,000 troops. Among other things, NATO officials are still working out where those troops will be located.

The military committee is made up of senior military officers from each NATO member and is the primary source of military advice to NATO’s civilian decision-making bodies – the North Atlantic Council and the Nuclear Planning Group.

Along with the spearhead force, the Readiness Action Plan approved by President Barack Obama and leaders of the 27 other allied nations includes stepped-up intelligence sharing, an upgrade of defense plans and more military exercises on short notice.

“This is an important event for the military committee because it ensures that the decisions taken by the heads of states and government taken at the Wales summit last month are properly operationalized and we stay focused on our work,” said Danish Army General Knud Bartels, chairman of the military committee, at a news conference at Allied Command Transformation headquarters.

Read more:
NATO military committee officials meet in Norfolk

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani calls for more academic freedom in his country's universities and a lifting of unnecessary restrictions.

Read more here:
Iran leader urges university freedom

FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin

Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by