Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman



SEO PowerSuite Enterprise 2014
I will provide SEO PowerSuite Enterprise Original Full Lifetime license Key service https://www.fiverr.com/s/5snyax You will get working key for each tool of Enterprise : 1) Rank Tracker…

By: Arafat Parvin Ripa

View original post here:
SEO PowerSuite Enterprise 2014 – Video

This kind of national pride is hard work. You have to decide what are the things your nation should be proud of and how it is going to achieve them in reality. Above, Yes supporters flags are displayed besides a block of flats on Leith Walk in Edinburgh, Scotland. Photograph: Matt Cardy/Getty Images

What does it mean to be a free country? No one is naive enough to believe that it means acquiring the capacity to do whatever you want. For governments, of big countries or small ones, room to manoeuvre is scarce. An independent Scotland would face the same limits on its freedom of action as it does now. The power of oligarchies and markets and inequalities to restrict democratic choice would not disappear. Freedom does not arrive just because you declare it. And if it ever does arrive, it is complicated, constrained and contested. Scots, coming late to the business of national independence, also come to it with few illusions. Too much has happened to too many dreams of national liberation for any sensible citizen to believe in a great moment of transformation after which everything will be simpler, purer, better.

But national freedom isnt meaningless either. Room to manoeuvre can be expanded. Democratic spaces can be opened up. The terms of the struggle between public and private interests can be renegotiated. Citizens can become more confident of their power to insist on decency and dignity. A place can be defined as a society and a culture as well as an economy. And the greater the constraints, the more naked the power of unaccountable elites, the more vital it is that whatever collective freedom remains is grasped.

Like everything else, though, even this qualified freedom has a price. Some of that price is literal the financial losses that have to be set against financial gains. But theres another kind of reckoning to be done, one that is more abstract but perhaps in the long term more important. National freedom isnt another word for nothing left to lose. Its another word for no one left to blame no one, that is, except yourself. If you make your own choices, you become responsible for their consequences.

This is, especially for small nations that have long been part of a larger imperial whole, a severe loss. Theres a deep and abiding satisfaction in imagining how wonderful you would be if only those foreign bastards would let you. Being free means having to live with the dawning realisation that you might not be so wonderful after all. Freedom in this sense is not an illusion its an act of deliberate disillusion.

What a free country quickly discovers is that the better Us of its imagination is not already there, fully formed, just waiting to blossom in the sun of liberation. It has to be created and in order to create it you have to genuinely decide you want it.

View original post here:
What kind of new state could Scotland be?



Liberty Pumps 257 1/3-Horse Power 1-1/2-Inch Discharge 250-Series Cast Iron Automatic Submersible
Liberty Pumps 257 1/3-Horse Power 1-1/2-Inch Discharge 250-Series Cast Iron Automatic Submersible Sump/Effluent Pump with VMF Switch Best Price http://az2.skdd2.com/B001PTT5JM Liberty Pumps…

By: Arthur Zanki

View post:
Liberty Pumps 257 1/3-Horse Power 1-1/2-Inch Discharge 250-Series Cast Iron Automatic Submersible – Video



Jeff Berwick Interview: The Power of Language, Inflation and Bitcoin
This interview starts off with some valuable wisdom from Jeff Berwick about the way we talk about the world around us. His insights on the financial system a…

By: Amagi Metals

See original here:
Jeff Berwick Interview: The Power of Language, Inflation and Bitcoin – Video



Introduction to SEO PowerSuite software
A short introduction to SEO PowerSuite software. Learn what tools are included into SEO PowerSuite software and how they help you win high search engine rankings for your site.

By: LinkAssistant

Visit link:
Introduction to SEO PowerSuite software – Video

Sep 102014

Who cares about Satoshi Nakamoto? Someone else has made Bitcoin what it is and has the most power over its destiny.

In March, a bewildered retired man faced journalists yelling questions about virtual currency outside his suburban home in Temple City, California. Dorian Nakamoto, 64, had been identified by Newsweek as the person who masterminded Bitcoina story that, like previous attempts to unmask its pseudonymous inventor, Satoshi Nakamoto, was soon discredited. Meanwhile, the person arguably most responsible for enabling the currency to swell in value to $7.7 billion, and with the most influence on its future, was hiding in plain sight on the other side of the country, in Amherst, Massachusetts.

That person is Gavin Andresen, a mild-mannered 48-year-old picked by the real Satoshi Nakamoto, whoever he or she is, as his successor in late 2010. Andresen became core maintainerchief developerof the open source code that defines the rules of Bitcoin and provides the software needed to make use of it. The combination of Nakamotos blessing and Andresens years of diligent, full-time work on the Bitcoin code has given him significant clout in Bitcoin circles and stature beyond. The CIA and Washington regulators have looked to him to explain the currency. And it was Andresen who conceived of the nonprofit Bitcoin Foundationestablished in 2013which is the closest thing to a central authority in the world of Bitcoin.

Some Bitcoin enthusiasts offer bombastic predictions that Americans will shake off the shackles of the Federal Reserve and poor nations will rise to prosperity with the low-cost transactions made possible by the stateless virtual currency. Other Bitcoin boosters have the air of salesmen chasing a mark, reeling off reasons you should buy into the currency that make you feel youre not getting the whole story. In contrast, Andresen seems to be in search of quiet personal satisfaction, cheerfully calling himself a geek interested in nuts and bolts things. He can make a pretty good pitch for Bitcoin, but he quickly slides into technical nuances that would be a turnoff for most. We say this is going to be the year of the multisignature wallet, he says when summing up what 2014 holds for Bitcoin.

Still, Andresen has had and maintains more influence than anyone else on the code that determines how Bitcoin operatesand ultimately whether it can survive. Although there is no central bank for the currency, its design needs significant changes if it is to become widely used. How Andresen wields his power over Bitcoin will shape not only its fate but also the prospects for other virtual currencies.

Lucky Bet

Bitcoins origins may be shrouded in mystery, but plenty is known about Andresen and his past. Formerly known as Gavin Bell, he has been a software engineer ever since he graduated in computer science from Princeton in 1988 and took a job with the Silicon Valley computing company Silicon Graphics. He worked there for seven years, and then at a series of startups building products from 3-D drawing software to online games for blind and sighted people to play together. Then he encountered Bitcoin in 2010.

Bitcoins were essentially worthless at the time and extremely finicky to get ahold of and use. But Andresen saw technical elegance in Nakamotos design, and a currency outside the control of any government appealed to what he calls his mostly libertarian politics. Rather than being created by a central bank, bitcoins are mined by people running software that races to solve a mathematical puzzle and win a prize of newly minted bitcoins. The mining process is designed to gradually pay out less and less over time, until 21 million bitcoins exist, and it also serves to verify transactions made in the currency (see What Bitcoin Is and Why It Matters).

Eager to see people start using Bitcoin, Andresen launched a website in 2010 called the Bitcoin Faucet that handed out five free bitcoins to every visitor. (A bitcoin was worth only cents at the time but each one trades for $600 today; Andresen reduced the size of the handout as bitcoins rose in value, then shut the site down in 2012.) He also began sending code tweaks and improvements to Nakamoto. Bitcoins founder liked his work, and soon made his protgs e-mail address the only one on the projects homepage. Andresen formally stepped forward in a December 2010 post on the Bitcoin forum. With Satoshis blessing, and with great reluctance, Im going to start doing more active project management for Bitcoin, he wrote. He has worked full-time on it ever since. The Bitcoin Foundation paid him $209,648 in 2013a salary he received in bitcoins.

His smooth ascent has led to frequent accusations that Andresen is Nakamoto and shed the pseudonym once the currency gained traction. He always flatly denies it. I am not Satoshi Nakamoto; I have never met him; I have had many e-mail conversations with him, he said after giving a talk in April. Nobody knows who he is, I think. If that was a lie, Andresen is a remarkable con man. Throughout hundreds of forum posts, e-mail messages, and lines of code, his style has been distinct from that of Nakamoto.

See the original post:
The Man Who Really Built Bitcoin

Facebook banned a gun rights activist due to entitled, Connecticuts Gun Ban Is Worse Than Hitlers Gun Ban. A recent video of a kitten in a burning bucket was deemed to be in line with the social networks community standards but the pro-Second Amendment article was not.

Gerry Emery received an alert that his gun rights article and accompanying image did not meet the Facebook Community Standards and therefore would be removed and his account suspended.

Facebook sent a message to the gun rights activist about the violation.

Youre temporarily blocked from posting. This temporary block will last 30 days and you wont be able to post on Facebook until its finished. Youre repeatedly posted things that arent allowed on Facebook. Read the Facebook Community Standards to learn what kinds of posts arent allowed.

Emerys Facebook ban did not stem from any type of threatening post, or one that involved illegal activity. The post noted that the man stood with Connecticut Second Amendment advocates and cited his views as to why the Holocaust and senseless slaughter of millions of Jewish people occurred.

Excerpt from Gerry Emerys banned Facebook post.

Connecticuts Gun Ban Is Worse Than Hitlers Gun Ban: Recently, 100,000 state residents who went to bed as law-abiding citizens and woke up a felon facing prison time. Connecticut Governor Malloy continues to pressure the 100,000 Connecticut residents who have refused to register their guns, to do so, or face forced gun confiscation at their homes. Why is Malloy still Governor? Why arent these people recalling this sorry excuse for a governor who obviously holds the Second Amendment in such disdain? How quickly we forget the lessons of history. If we ever allow government to subvert the second amendment, we very well could be witnessing a prelude to an American genocide. There is nothing as dangerous to a totalitarian regime as an educated and well-armed populace. Emery goes on to note that Connecticut resident David Schmecker, a retired Navy veteran, had his guns confiscated and his permit to carry revoked because he refused to submit to a psychological examination as ordered by an interim doctor, before the Navy vet could be prescribed pain medication.

The post banned by Facebook also addressed the Nazi Weapons Act of 1938.

Frighteningly, American gun control legislation is imitating Hitlers Nazi Germany gun control legislation. Consider the key provisions of the Nazi Weapons Act of 1938 and compare it with the Connecticut gun ban. The parallels of both the provisions and the legal language are eerily similar and in some cases the Connecticut ban is worse that anything Hitler implemented. The lesson of the 20th Century genocides can no longer be dismissed as something that could never happen in America. The logic of personal self-defense should be hitting home as our country plunges deeper into the depths of fascist totalitarian control; e.g., Patriot Acts 1&2, the NDAA, Executive Order 13603, the multitude of spying bills which allow for the spying on American citizens who are engaged in ordinary activities.

The German gun ban also assumed the power to decide what types of guns could or could not be owned by citizens and mandated that every type of ammunition was subject to the control of government officials.

See the original post here:
Facebook Bans Gun Rights Activist Over Holocaust Post

Senators opened a historic debate Monday on whether to alter the First Amendment to give Congress the power to squelch free speech in the form of campaign spending, setting up a showdown vote later this week on the first alterations to the founding document in decades.

Democrats say the debate is a referendum on democracy and keeping the wealthy from distorting the system. Republicans counter its a debate about fundamental freedom of speech that all Americans should have.

For Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, the Nevada Democrat driving the debate, its chiefly about two people Charles and David Koch, the billionaire brothers who pour tens of millions of dollars into conservative and libertarian causes.

They are trying to buy America, at every level of government, Mr. Reid said.

Democrats are trying to undo several Supreme Court decisions that have ruled that spending money on issue ads is covered by free speech guarantees that neither Congress nor the states can ban.

Their legislation would give Congress or state legislatures the power to set reasonable limits on how much money political candidates could raise and spend in seeking election and power to prohibit outside groups from spending any money at all on ads.

That would apply particularly to corporations, whom Democrats say are increasingly being granted rights that should be reserved to individuals.

Their proposed amendment would specifically carve out an exemption for the corporations that own the press, which would be allowed to use its reporting to influence elections.

Republicans said Democrats were trying to silence political opponents rather than debate their ideas and accused Mr. Reid of forcing the issue to the floor in order to rally his political base ahead of Novembers elections.

This proposed amendment would be the biggest threat to free speech that Congress would have enacted since the Alien and Sedition Acts back in 1798, said Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican.

Here is the original post:
Senate debates limiting campaign cash by altering First Amendment

Portland, Oregon — Freedom Powersports, a company of six collective powersports dealers in Texas, placed on the Powersports Business Power 50 list. This is an outstanding accomplishment in the industry. …

See more here:
Dealership Performance CRM Gives Top 50 Dealer Freedom Powersports Sales Advantage

Joan Rivers conspiracy theories have hit the internet. It hasnt even been 24 hours since Joan passed away at Mount Sinai hospital in Manhattan, New York, but the first chatter of a conspiracy surfaced just hours after Joan died. According to The International Business Times, some people are finding a connection to (wait for it) Jay-Z and Beyonce, and are blaming the Illuminati for Joans death.

First things first, Joans last insult/joke on Twitter was on Aug. 27 and was about Bey and Jay.

Joan Rivers went into cardiac arrest the very next day (Thursday, Aug. 28). The Fashion Police star was having a procedure done on her vocal chords when she stopped breathing. Now, according to TMZ, the clinic where Joan was having the procedure is not only being investigated, but there have also been death threats sent. People are blaming the staff at the New York area clinic for Joans death as well.

However, the connections being made between Joan and Jay-Z and Beyonce are strange coincidental you might say but strange nonetheless. Someone (at least one person) wrote out the connections between Joans death and the power couple. You may or may not have seen the following facts posted on social media.

Joan Rivers cause of death is said to be under investigation. As previously reported by the Inquisitr, some people are making a Michael Jackson link in the case. Could Joan have died due to the same drug blamed in MJs death? To many, it is a very real possibility.

Newly sourced information suggests that investigators are eyeing the drug Propofol the anesthesia connected to Michael Jacksons death, as a cause behind Rivers hospitalization.

Of course, this is much easier to believe by most people. There will more than likely be a definitive answer as to why Joan stopped breathing on that fateful August day, and it wont have anything to do with a not-so-secret cult group. That doesnt mean that people will stop talking about it. It just means that there might be a more reasonable answer to the questions why and how.

Oh, and in case this stuff fascinates you in any way, there is a wicked creepy YouTube video (that is a little blurry), that shows more proof that Joan Rivers was an Illuminati sacrifice. Check it out below.

[Photo courtesy of YouTube]

See the original post here:
Joan Rivers Conspiracy Theory: Jay Z And Beyonces Illuminati Blamed For Joans Death



Top NSA Whistleblower: NSA Has The Power To Blackmail Anyone
Alex Jones interviews William Binney about the police state and what he sees coming down the pipe. http://www.infowars.com/mystery-solved-the-truth-about-fake-cellphone-towers/ Follow Alex…

By: TheAlexJonesChannel

Follow this link:
Top NSA Whistleblower: NSA Has The Power To Blackmail Anyone – Video

Sep 052014

Fourth Amendment:Searches and SeizuresWhat is the Fourth Amendment?The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.The Fourth Amendment Defined:Like the majority of fields within American law, the Fourth Amendment is heavily rooted in the English legal doctrine. In a general sense, the Fourth Amendment was created to limit the power of the government and their ability to enforce legal actions on individuals. The Fourth Amendment was adopted as a direct response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which was a type of general search warrant used by the government during the American Revolution. The Amendment was created to limit the powers of the law enforcement agency who is conducting a search of an individuals personal property.The Fourth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.Stipulations of the 4th AmendmentThe Fourth Amendment guards against the governments ability to conduct unreasonable search and seizures when the individual party being searched has a reasonable exception of privacy.The Fourth Amendment specifically requires a law enforcement agency to possess judicially sanctioned search and arrest warrants, which are supported by probable clause, to be administered before a persons property can be inspected.The Fourth Amendment ties in numerous limitations whereby an individual may be searched without a warrant given the presence of certain circumstances. The individuals property may be searched and seized if: The individual is on parole or in a tax hearing, faces deportation, the evidence is seized from a common carrier, the evidence is collected by U.S. customs agents, the evidence is seized by probation officers, the evidence is seized outside of the United States, or probable cause is evident.Court Cases tied into the 4th AmendmentIn Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment is enforceable and should be applied to all states in the Union by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled that certain searches and seizures were in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment even when a warrant was properly issued to the coordinating law enforcement agencies.State Timeline for Ratification of the Bill of RightsNew Jersey:November 20, 1789; rejected article IIMaryland:December 19, 1789; approved allNorth Carolina:December 22, 1789; approved allSouth Carolina: January 19, 1790; approved allNew Hampshire: January 25, 1790; rejected article IIDelaware: January 28, 1790; rejected article INew York: February 27, 1790; rejected article IIPennsylvania: March 10, 1790; rejected article IIRhode Island: June 7, 1790; rejected article IIVermont: November 3, 1791; approved allVirginia: December 15, 1791; approved all

Fourth Amendment:Searches and Seizures

What is the Fourth Amendment? The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

The Fourth Amendment Defined: Like the majority of fields within American law, the Fourth Amendment is heavily rooted in the English legal doctrine. In a general sense, the Fourth Amendment was created to limit the power of the government and their ability to enforce legal actions on individuals. The Fourth Amendment was adopted as a direct response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, which was a type of general search warrant used by the government during the American Revolution. The Amendment was created to limit the powers of the law enforcement agency who is conducting a search of an individuals personal property.

The Fourth Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.

The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.

Stipulations of the 4th Amendment The Fourth Amendment guards against the governments ability to conduct unreasonable search and seizures when the individual party being searched has a reasonable exception of privacy.

The Fourth Amendment specifically requires a law enforcement agency to possess judicially sanctioned search and arrest warrants, which are supported by probable clause, to be administered before a persons property can be inspected.

The Fourth Amendment ties in numerous limitations whereby an individual may be searched without a warrant given the presence of certain circumstances. The individuals property may be searched and seized if: The individual is on parole or in a tax hearing, faces deportation, the evidence is seized from a common carrier, the evidence is collected by U.S. customs agents, the evidence is seized by probation officers, the evidence is seized outside of the United States, or probable cause is evident.Court Cases tied into the 4th Amendment In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme Court ruled that the Fourth Amendment is enforceable and should be applied to all states in the Union by way of the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Additionally, the Supreme Court ruled that certain searches and seizures were in direct violation of the Fourth Amendment even when a warrant was properly issued to the coordinating law enforcement agencies.State Timeline for Ratification of the Bill of Rights New Jersey:November 20, 1789; rejected article II

Maryland:December 19, 1789; approved all

Excerpt from:
4th Amendment – Laws.com



Bitcoin Power Chat w/ Will Pangman – David Seaman Hour
Get David's Bitcoin life newsletter, never miss out: http://voin.co/upgraded-service-deep-newsletter/ You can now subscribe using PayPal or a card, too: http://voin.co/deep-now-accepts-paypal-c…

By: David Seaman

Read more:
Bitcoin Power Chat w/ Will Pangman – David Seaman Hour – Video

Sep 042014



Freedom cloud signpost
Upresentation is the biggest base of PowerPoint templates on the Internet. Thousands of free templates are waiting for you. To download this template in PowerPoint format (.pptx) click the…

By: Roy Leet

Read more:
Freedom cloud signpost – Video

Fifth Amendment,amendment (1791) to the Constitution of the United States, part of the Bill of Rights, that articulates procedural safeguards designed to protect the rights of the criminally accused and to secure life, liberty, and property. For the text of the Fifth Amendment, see below.

Similar to the First Amendment, the Fifth Amendment is divided into five clauses, representing five distinct, yet related, rights. The first clause specifies that [n]o person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger. This grand jury provision requires a body to make a formal presentment or indictment of a person accused of committing a crime against the laws of the federal government. The proceeding is not a trial but rather an ex parte hearing (i.e., one in which only one party, the prosecution, presents evidence) to determine if the government has enough evidence to carry a case to trial. If the grand jury finds sufficient evidence that an offense was committed, it issues an indictment, which then permits a trial. The portion of the clause pertaining to exceptions in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia is a corollary to Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power [t]o make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces. Combined, they justify the use of military courts for the armed forces, thus denying military personnel the same procedural rights afforded civilians.

The second section is commonly referred to as the double jeopardy clause, and it protects citizens against a second prosecution after an acquittal or a conviction, as well as against multiple punishments for the same offense. Caveats to this provision include permissions to try persons for civil and criminal aspects of an offense, conspiring to commit as well as to commit an offense, and separate trials for acts that violate laws of both the federal and state governments, although federal laws generally suppress prosecution by the national government if a person is convicted of the same crime in a state proceeding.

The third section is commonly referred to as the self-incrimination clause, and it protects persons accused of committing a crime from being forced to testify against themselves. In the U.S. judicial system a person is presumed innocent, and it is the responsibility of the state (or national government) to prove guilt. Like other pieces of evidence, once presented, words can be used powerfully against a person; however, words can be manipulated in a way that many other objects cannot. Consequently, information gained from sobriety tests, police lineups, voice samples, and the like is constitutionally permissible while evidence gained from compelled testimony is not. As such, persons accused of committing crimes are protected against themselves or, more accurately, how their words may be used against them. The clause, therefore, protects a key aspect of the system as well as the rights of the criminally accused.

The fourth section is commonly referred to as the due process clause. It protects life, liberty, and property from impairment by the federal government. (The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, protects the same rights from infringement by the states.) Chiefly concerned with fairness and justice, the due process clause seeks to preserve and protect fundamental rights and ensure that any deprivation of life, liberty, or property occurs in accordance with procedural safeguards. As such, there are both substantive and procedural considerations associated with the due process clause, and this has influenced the development of two separate tracks of due process jurisprudence: procedural and substantive. Procedural due process pertains to the rules, elements, or methods of enforcementthat is, its procedural aspects. Consider the elements of a fair trial and related Sixth Amendment protections. As long as all relevant rights of the accused are adequately protectedas long as the rules of the game, so to speak, are followedthen the government may, in fact, deprive a person of his life, liberty, or property. But what if the rules are not fair? What if the law itselfregardless of how it is enforcedseemingly deprives rights? This raises the controversial spectre of substantive due process rights. It is not inconceivable that the content of the law, regardless of how it is enforced, is itself repugnant to the Constitution because it violates fundamental rights. Over time, the Supreme Court has had an on-again, off-again relationship with liberty-based due process challenges, but it has generally abided by the principle that certain rights are implicit in the concept of ordered liberty (Palko v. Connecticut [1937]), and as such they are afforded constitutional protection. This, in turn, has led to the expansion of the meaning of the term liberty. What arguably began as freedom from restraint has transformed into a virtual cornucopia of rights reasonably related to enumerated rights, without which neither liberty nor justice would exist. For example, the right to an abortion, established in Roe v. Wade (1973), grew from privacy rights, which emerged from the penumbras of the constitution.

Read more:
Fifth Amendment (United States Constitution …



I2G- Infinity 2 Global- Super Freedom Training Power Hour
I2G- Infinity 2 Global- Super Freedom Training Power Hour I2G Infinity 2 Global- Super Training Power Hour! Join 7 Figure Earners at 8pm Est I2G- Infinity 2 Global- Get Paid To Play Online…

By: dave manning

Continued here:
I2G- Infinity 2 Global- Super Freedom Training Power Hour – Video



best top backlink tools SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization
http://internetmarketingsolutionshere.com/?p=227 SEO PowerSuite SEO PowerSuite is the all-in-one, full-cycle SEO software. This is the most feature rich SEO toolkit that helped over 900000…

By: seo powersuite review

See more here:
best top backlink tools SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization – Video



best backlink tools review SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization
http://internetmarketingsolutionshere.com/?p=227 SEO PowerSuite SEO PowerSuite is the all-in-one, full-cycle SEO software. This is the most feature rich SEO toolkit that helped over 900000…

By: seo powersuite review

See the original post here:
best backlink tools review SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization – Video



best best seo automation tool SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization
http://internetmarketingsolutionshere.com/?p=227 SEO PowerSuite SEO PowerSuite is the all-in-one, full-cycle SEO software. This is the most feature rich SEO toolkit that helped over 900000…

By: seo powersuite review

Go here to see the original:
best best seo automation tool SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization – Video



best backlink tools free SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization
http://internetmarketingsolutionshere.com/?p=227 SEO PowerSuite SEO PowerSuite is the all-in-one, full-cycle SEO software. This is the most feature rich SEO toolkit that helped over 900000…

By: seo powersuite review

Visit link:
best backlink tools free SEO PowerSuite the worldwide standard for search engine optimization – Video



FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin




Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by us.groups.yahoo.com