Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman

$3.3m power plant turned on JACK MONTGOMERIE


Infratec Renewables’ completed 960-kilowatt solar panel plant in Rarotonga.

A South Canterbury company’s subsidiary has switched on a $3.3 million Cook Islands solar power plant.

Cook Islands Prime Minister Henry Puna opened Netcon subsidiary Infratec Renewables’ 960-kilowatt Te Mana o Te Ra plant in Rarotonga on Monday.

The country aims to produce 50 per cent of its electricity from renewable sources by next year, rising to 100 per cent by 2020. The panels Infratec installed are expected to produce about 5 per cent of the Cook Islands’ electricity.

Infratec general manager Peter Apperley said the project had been a huge collaborative effort between New Zealand and the Cook Islands.

Site manager Tony Scott and 10 Rarotongan workers installed the panels next to Rarotonga International Airport. They will be owned and operated by Cook Islands electricity company Te Aponga Uira.

New Zealand’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade paid for the power plant and High Commissioner Joanna Kempkers said the project had been completed on time and on budget.

Netcon parent company Alpine Energy’s chief executive Andrew Tombs said Alpine remained interested in the development of solar power.

See the rest here:
Solar panels light up the Cook Islands

OTTAWA , Oct.21, 2014 /CNW/ – The field of regenerative medicine harnessing the power of stem cells, biomaterials and molecules to repair, regenerate or replace diseased cells, tissues and organs …

Visit link:
Media Advisory – Regenerative medicine experts come to Ottawa to share latest discoveries

Download SEO PowerSuite Key Generator
Get here or SEO PowerSuite Download Keygen SEO PowerSuite download SEO PowerSuite free download keygen SEO PowerSuite serial SEO PowerSuite…

By: Corrie Salisbury

The rest is here:
Download SEO PowerSuite Key Generator – Video

Wellington City Councils environment committee agreed at yesterdays meeting to welcome and allow campers visiting the Capital to freedom camp except in some parts of the city.

The Council has been permissive but at the same time protective of Wellingtons open green spaces, reserves, flora and fauna.

Changes have been made to part (12) of the Public Places by-law consistent with the Freedom Camping Act 2011. Parliament originally intended to prohibit freedom camping and now the permissive legislation allows it, except where it is prohibited. The recommendations from the committee will have further public consultation after the November Council meeting.

Councillor Helene Ritchie says, “Visitors and campers to Wellington will be able to enjoy the city and the natural environment we have so close to the heart of the CBD, the harbour and the Coast. However, camping will be prohibited in central city parks such as Frank Kitts or Waitangi Park; campervans will eventually have a new site on Port land, and camping on reserve land or inner city parks will still not be allowed”.

The Bylaw will regulate camping in specific public places to protect particular areas and the health and safety of visitors to these areas, with notices and friendly rangers who will have warrants but will only as a last resort exercise the power that they will have to fine people up to $200 who damage plants or leave litter behind.

49 submissions were received as part of the consultation on the draft bylaw and most were supportive of the proposed changes.

While freedom camping in most reserves is still restricted under reserve management plans, except for some coastal areas, freedom camping will be encouraged at the Te Kopahou Reserve entrance at Owhiro Bay, and campers in self-contained vehicles will be able to stay at the southern end of Evans Bay marina.

See the original post here:
Wellington welcomes freedom campers

Best Seller Pumps – Liberty Pumps 331 1/2-Horse Power Portable Transfer Pump, Love this pump
Are you looking for Liberty Pumps 331 1/2-Horse Power Portable Transfer Pump, see complete and helpful info, click here …

By: andy best product

View original post here:
Best Seller Pumps – Liberty Pumps 331 1/2-Horse Power Portable Transfer Pump, Love this pump – Video

DALLAS, Oct. 14 (UPI) — A Russian group of hackers exploited a flaw in a computer operating system to spy on NATO and other security targets, a report says.

The Dallas based cybersecurity firm that uncovered the plot, iSight Partners, said a previously undiscovered flaw in Microsoft’s Windows system allowed sensitive documents pertaining to the NATO summit held in Wales in September to be targeted.

ISight dubbed the hacking group the Sandworm Team, the Washington Post reported. It was presumably working for the Russian government and has been active since at least 2009, the report said, adding that a Polish energy firm, the Ukrainian government’s computers and at least one nation in Western Europe were also targeted.

The flaw, known as zero-day for the amount of time programmers are aware of it, likely allowed hackers to find e-mails, Power Point presentations and encryption keys in computers considered secure.

Although policy statements were released after the NATO summit, much of the planning occurred in secret. The agenda included preparing a unified response to Russia’s influence in Crimea and Ukraine, and plans for confronting the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.

U.S. President Barack Obama attended the meeting, as did Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and high-level military and civilian leaders from each NATO country.

2014 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Any reproduction, republication, redistribution and/or modification of any UPI content is expressly prohibited without UPI’s prior written consent.

Read the rest here:
Report: Russian hackers spied on NATO

Microsoft says it’s patching a Windows security flaw cited in a report on alleged spying by Russian hackers. Ted S. Warren/AP hide caption

Microsoft says it’s patching a Windows security flaw cited in a report on alleged spying by Russian hackers.

A group of hackers, allegedly from Russia, found a fundamental flaw in Microsoft Windows and exploited it to spy on Western governments, NATO, European energy companies and an academic organization in the United States.

That’s according to new research from iSight Partners, a Dallas-based cybersecurity firm.

Last month, the U.S. and the U.K. were preparing to meet at a NATO summit to talk about Ukraine. Emails were flying back and forth. Different experts were offering to talk at the conference. And in the midst of all the digital traffic, hackers jumped into the conversation.

Patrick McBride, a spokesman with iSight, says the hackers targeted specific officials using a well-known kind of attack called spear-phishing. Hackers would craft a message with a PowerPoint document attached. For example, they’d say, “We’d like to be involved in the conference.”

And when an unknowing recipient opened the corrupted PowerPoint, the file was exploited to load a piece of malware onto the computer that the attacker could then use later to “exfiltrate documents,” McBride says.

The hacker group, dubbed the “Sandworm Team,” allegedly pulled emails and documents off computers from NATO, Ukrainian government groups, Western European government officials, and energy sector and telecommunications firms.

In the mad dash to grab information, McBride says, the hackers got a little sloppy and dropped hints about their identity. He says they’re Russian, “but we can’t pinpoint if they work for the Russian government or work in a particular department in the government.”

The Russian embassy did not immediately respond to NPR’s inquiry. Microsoft says that Tuesday, it’s patching the security flaw so that PowerPoint and other Office products can’t be exploited again in the same way.

See original here:
Microsoft Windows Flaw Let Russian Hackers Spy On NATO, Report Says

Contact Information

Available for logged-in reporters only

Newswise Four scientists from the Eli and Edythe Broad Center of Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research at UCLA have received a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Director’s New Innovator Award that will forward revolutionary stem cell and neuro-science in medicine. The four UCLA researchers were among only 50 scientists nationwide to receive the New Innovator Award, the most of any institution represented.

Each recipient received a $2.3M award for their respective projects. These included Dr. Reza Ardehali, assistant professor of cardiology, for his research investigating novel ways to use stem cells to regenerate heart tissue; Dr. Elissa Hallem, assistant professor of microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics, for her work studying interactions between animal parasites and their hosts to foster the further understanding of human parasitic diseases; Dr. Sririam Kosuri, assistant professor of chemistry and biochemistry, for his project developing new biological system technologies to solve outstanding problems in gene regulation; and Dr. Lili Yang, assistant professor of microbiology, immunology and molecular genetics, for her work developing a new method to track special immune cells for use in new cellular therapies.

“These New Innovator Award grants are an important acknowledgement of our cutting-edge research and will help our faculty drive the revolutionary advances we are seeing in stem cell and neuro-science,” said Dr. Owen Witte, professor and director of the Broad Stem Cell Research Center. “Every cellular therapy that reaches patients must begin in the laboratory with novel ideas and experiments that will lead us in new directions in medicine and ultimately improve human life. That makes these awards invaluable to our research effort.”

The NIH Director’sNew Innovator Award is designed specifically to support unusually creative investigators with highly innovative research ideas at an early stage of their career. The award seeks to support exceptionally creative new scientists whose research complements ongoing efforts by NIH.

Dr. Reza Ardehali: Unlocking the Secrets to Regenerating Heart Tissue

Dr. Ardehali’s cutting-edge work focuses on both human embryonic stem cells and induced pluripotent stem cells, known as human pluripotent stem cells (hPSC), to provide insights into the mechanisms involved in the differentiation and specification of heart cells. hPSC have the unique ability to become any cell type in the body. His lab recently identified several novel surface markers that can highly enrich early cardiovascular progenitor cells. When delivered into functioning human hearts that are transplanted in laboratory conditions, the progenitor cells integrate structurally and functionally into the host myocardium. These studies established the basis for future hPSC-based cardiac therapy.

Dr. Ardehali and his colleagues were also the first to directly measure limited division in the cells that make up heart muscle (cardiomyocytes), proving that cardiomyocytes divide and that such cell division is rare. This discovery resolves an important controversy over whether the heart muscle has the power to regenerate and is critical for future research that may lead to regenerating heart tissue to repair damage caused by disease or heart attack.

His 2013, California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM), the state’s stem cell research agency, New Faculty Physician Scientist Translational Research Award allowed Dr. Ardehali to initiate the preclinical studies on stem cell based therapies for heart disease that were pivotal for his success in the 2014 New Innovator Award competition. The NIH grant affirms the critical success of the project-to-date, and emphasizes the creativity of Dr. Ardehali’s research and its potential to have a significant impact on the creation of novel regenerative approaches to treat heart disease.

Originally posted here:
Four UCLA Scientists Receive Prestigious Innovator Award for Pioneering Research Using Stem Cells


By: Derpy Lion

Read the rest here:


The National Rifle Association and their fellow gun enthusiasts continue to misconstrue the founders original intent in creating the Second Amendment to the Constitution. A recently published NRA comment states that Guns save lives, stop crime and protect you. This is why we arm police, why people arm themselves and why the Founders put the Second Amendment in the Constitution.

The amendment reads as follows: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed. A total of 27 words.

The NRAs comment in the first paragraph would be accurate if these first 13 words of the Second Amendment concerning the role of a militia had not been included in this simple statement. The first 13 words have meaning. The founders were much concerned about the power of a standing army and the possibility of overt military control of the fledgling country.

In 1791 the members of the Virginia legislature elaborated on the importance of a militia in a letter accompanying their ratification of the first 10 amendments (1791). They stated that, a well regulated Militia composed of the body of the people trained to arms is the proper, natural and safe defence of a free State. That armies in the time of peace are dangerous to liberty: and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to and governed by the Civil power. 1791 was a time when less than 15 percent of the white male population, mostly untrained in the military use of weapons, possessed guns.

The requirement for a well trained militia rather than a standing army was further emphasized in several issues of the Federalist Papers authored by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay. In fact, Federalist No. 29 was exclusively dedicated to the need for a militia.

Of course, the issue of no standing army was short-lived. The War of 1812 proved that a standing army and navy were essential to our survival as an independent nation. The concern, however, about undue influence of the military remains today.

Over the years Supreme Court rulings have essentially ignored the first half of the Second Amendment, opting instead for easy access to weapons. A major question: How did the founders intent to provide for a militia evolve into a nation with over 300 million guns in circulation?

Retired Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, in his recent book, Six Amendments: How and Why We Should Change the Constitution, proposes the addition of five words to the Second Amendment. As so amended, it would read: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed.

There is no Second Amendment right to own guns! So intended the founders!

Founders intended limits on gun rights

New Freedom looks at Human Trafficking
New Freedom seeks to invoke the power of the ancestors to affect change onto the contemporary landscape of social justice today. To learn more about the New Freedom Project by visual artist,…

By: Charmaine Minniefield

Read more here:
New Freedom looks at Human Trafficking – Video

Oct 062014

7 62 x51mm NATO firestarter
A short clip of a longer video I am prepping for upload. I was working on shots at 200 yards for an upcoming High Power Match, witha Foreign Service Rifle, a Spanish CETME 7.62 x 51mm. The…

By: Jon with no h shootology channel

Originally posted here:
7 62 x51mm NATO firestarter – Video

The libertarian sentiment reflects the pitchfork politics that gave rise to the Tea Party on the right and the Occupy movements on the left that were both fuelled by public disillusion with the power of conventional politics to deliver anything other than the stagnant status quo.

Measuring the potential electoral impact of libertarianism is difficult precisely because it cuts across traditional party lines, which is both its protean strength and political weakness in an era of big money politics.

Put a capital ‘L’ on libertarianism and it largely evaporates Gary Johnson, the Libertarian Party candidate in 2012, won only 1 per cent of the popular vote (1.2m people), but research by the Cato Institute, the libertarian think-thank, points a much deeper pool of Americans with libertarian leanings.

When they asked voters if they considered themselves “fiscally conservative and socially liberal also known as libertarian”, some 44 per cent of Americans were happy to be placed in that category.

The politician most obviously trying to capitalise on the idea that Americans aren’t quite so easily pigeonholed into red and blue boxes is Rand Paul, a Republican senator from Kentucky who the bookies rate as a leading contender for 2016.

As the son of veteran libertarian Ron Paul, his formula will be to bring libertarian ideas off the fringe where his cranky dad always languished and into the mainstream, tapping that well of disaffection that resonates across party lines.

The younger Paul has demonstrated a knack for cutting through when it comes to popular issues.

When riot police overstepped the mark in Ferguson, Missouri following the shooting of a black teenager this summer, it was Mr Paul who spoke out about the obscene militarisation of American police forces, hitting a sweet spot with both young liberals and conservative anti-big government types.

In the same vein and in a rare moment of bipartisanship, Mr Paul is working with a Democrat colleague to end the mandatory sentencing laws that are clogging up America’s bloated and broken jail system with non-violent offenders, at vast cost and to little good effect.

It is a bold gambit that could resonate both with minorities particularly African-Americans who are disproportionately sentenced and the young drug decriminalisation lobby which has gathered strength since Colorado and Washington state legalised marijuana in 2012.

Read the rest here:
American Way: between Democrats and Republicans, a libertarian "third force" is emerging

Freedom, or liberty, is the power or right to do as one wants.

Freedom may also refer to:

Follow this link:
Freedom (disambiguation) – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What if activists from the Free Speech Movement 50 years ago had been able to use Twitter? One could imagine the real-time alerts drawing an even bigger crowd faster as student Jack Weinberg was being arrested on Oct. 1, 1964, for setting up a table at Sproul Plaza despite the ban on on-campus political activities. And people near and far would have surely seen the videos recorded by smartphones, uploaded to YouTube and spread via Facebook of Mario Savio standing on top of a police car, calling on students to stand up for their First Amendment rights.

Kweku Opoku-Agyemang, a Development Impact Lab Postdoctoral Fellow at UC Berkeleys Blum Center for Developing Economies, explains how the use of mobile technology that automates survey-taking can help expand the political power of the general public in Ghana. (UC Berkeley video produced by Roxanne Makasdjian and Phil Ebiner)

The communication tools of today have changed social movements since the Free Speech Movement. Whether it is an online petition via or survey software that makes it easier for users to register their opinions for elected officials, more options are available for expressing views than ever before.

Reported efforts by Chinese officials to censor news of the current pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong by disrupting access to Instagram and removing references to the demonstrations illustrate the degree to which social media is seen as a threat.

How technology aids social change

Social media, purely as a logistical organizing mechanism, has transformed the ability of people to congregate and protest because of the speed and ease with which information is shared, said Camille Crittenden, director of the Data and Democracy Initiative at the Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society (CITRIS). Compared with the 1960s, youre going to be able to organize more quickly, and youre going to be able to document the event more comprehensively.

Clay Shirky, professor of new media at New York University and author of Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, wrote a 2011 policy paper in the magazine Foreign Affairs about the political power of social media. Shirky used as an example the 2001 impeachment trial of Philippine President Joseph Estrada for corruption. Less than two hours after news was announced that Estrada might escape punishment, text messages summoned thousands of Filipinos to gather in Manila.

Over the next several days, the crowd swelled to more than a million people. The publics ability to coordinate such a massive and rapid response close to 7 million text messages were sent that week so alarmed the countrys legislators that they reversed course and allowed damning evidence against Estrada to be presented, Shirky wrote. Within days, Estrada was ousted.

The event marked the first time that social media had helped force out a national leader, wrote Shirky.

Here is the original post:
Cybertools offer new channels for free speech, but grassroots organizing still critical

Reno, NV — First Liberty Power Corp. (FLPC: OTC Pink), a diversified exploration, development and junior mining company focused on strategic minerals for America's future, today announced the completion …

Read this article:
First Liberty Power Secures Refining Capacity in the United States

Sep 242014

Power Word Freedom
What does freedom mean to you? This week the power word is freedom. Are you living freely or with limitations?

By: Magnificent Minded

See the original post here:
Power Word Freedom – Video

LAUDERDALE, Fla., Sept. 24, 2014 /PRNewswire/ –Liberty Power, the nation's largest independent retail electric supplier, is proud to announce the top three winners of its second annual Liberty Power Bright Horizons Scholarship program. The scholarship a collaborative effort between Liberty Power and the United States Hispanic Chamber of Commerce (USHCC) Foundation awarded three college …

Go here to read the rest:
Top Three Winners of Liberty Power Bright Horizons Scholarship Award Announced

Former Internal Revenue Service Director of Exempt Organizations Lois Lerner cited the Fifth…

Everyone in Washington has a P.R. machine, or at minimum, an agenda. That’s certainly the case with Lois Lerner, the former IRS executive whose division targeted conservative nonprofit applicants with delays and harassment.

Lerner’s division of the IRS systematically obstructed and denied status to Tea Party groups while subjecting many of the smallest ones those most vulnerable and least likely to be lawyered up to inappropriate demands for information that was not legally required. In one case, this included the content of the opening prayer recited in meetings, and in others, this IRS Inquisition demanded that leaders of certain groups pledge never to run for office.

Lerner is out of that business now, and on to a new campaign. This campaign, in which she has enlisted friends and former colleagues, aims to tell the side of the story that she has refused to give Congress under oath.

The resulting Politico piece includes this is no joke the revelations that she once baked brownies for colleagues and that she loves dogs. How delightful for her and the dogs! But so what? Lerner cited the Fifth Amendment and refused to answer questions about her involvement in this scandal. The reason for doing that is that she believes her answers could facilitate a criminal prosecution against her. The mysterious destruction of evidence in this case strongly suggests she is right to worry about that. So does her concerned email inquiry to government IT workers as to whether her instant messages with colleagues could ever be obtained by congressional investigators.

Lerner is willing to testify only in the news media, where the whole truth is not required and irrelevant information can be shared to make her seem less unsympathetic.

But Lerner’s complaints about her treatment, her inability to find a job to supplement her pension, and her legal bills fall flat. She and her attorneys complain that the disparaging opinions she once expressed by email about conservatives, later obtained by Congress, should not be used against her. It would be unreasonable, she and her defenders point out, to expect her not to have opinions.

She is correct, America is a free country where all may express their views. But then, that’s precisely why Lerner finds herself in so much hot water. Her IRS division used government power to suppress the political opinions of others to make private citizens unfree to express opinions she does not like.

If liberals are so irked that conservatives have freedom of speech, freedom of association, and freedom to spend their own money on advocacy, there is a proper channel for their frustration. They can weaken or even abolish the First Amendment to the Constitution. Democrats tried this in the U.S. Senate earlier this month, and good for them it is the right of every elected official to take such a political risk, because voters can hold such officials accountable.

But it’s quite another thing for powerful, entrenched and unaccountable bureaucrats to abuse their power and attack others’ constitutional rights from deep within the intestines of the government. This is why Lerner now finds herself a pariah, and it’s also why she isn’t a victim.

Read the original:
Cry us a river, Lois Lerner

Engineers vs. Thugs: the Power of Bitcoin, Cryptography Tech
Vinay Gupta is one of those unique minds. A pragmatist without the negativity, and a visionary unleashed from ideology. If you enjoyed this interview, feed me. I'm 100%…

By: BraveTheWorld

Original post:
Engineers vs. Thugs: the Power of Bitcoin, Cryptography & Tech – Video

FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin

Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by