Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman

What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press

 Posthumanism  Comments Off on What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press
Jun 242016
 

Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools

Navigation

Beyond humanism and anthropocentrism

Can a new kind of humanitiesposthumanitiesrespond to the redefinition of humanity’s place in the world by both the technological and the biological or “green” continuum in which the “human” is but one life form among many? Exploring this radical repositioning, Cary Wolfe ranges across bioethics, cognitive science, animal ethics, gender, and disability to develop a theoretical and philosophical approach responsive to our changing understanding of ourselves and our world.

What Is Posthumanism? is an original, thoroughly argued, fundamental redefinition and refocusing of posthumanism. Firmly distinguishing posthumanism from discourses of the posthuman or transhumanism, this book will be at the center of discussion for a long time to come.

Donna Haraway, author of When Species Meet

What does it mean to think beyond humanism? Is it possible to craft a mode of philosophy, ethics, and interpretation that rejects the classic humanist divisions of self and other, mind and body, society and nature, human and animal, organic and technological? Can a new kind of humanitiesposthumanitiesrespond to the redefinition of humanitys place in the world by both the technological and the biological or green continuum in which the human is but one life form among many?

Exploring how both critical thought along with cultural practice have reacted to this radical repositioning, Cary Wolfeone of the founding figures in the field of animal studies and posthumanist theoryranges across bioethics, cognitive science, animal ethics, gender, and disability to develop a theoretical and philosophical approach responsive to our changing understanding of ourselves and our world. Then, in performing posthumanist readings of such diverse works as Temple Grandins writings, Wallace Stevenss poetry, Lars von Triers Dancer in the Dark, the architecture of Diller+Scofidio, and David Byrne and Brian Enos My Life in the Bush of Ghosts, he shows how this philosophical sensibility can transform art and culture.

For Wolfe, a vibrant, rigorous posthumanism is vital for addressing questions of ethics and justice, language and trans-species communication, social systems and their inclusions and exclusions, and the intellectual aspirations of interdisciplinarity. In What Is Posthumanism? he carefully distinguishes posthumanism from transhumanism (the biotechnological enhancement of human beings) and narrow definitions of the posthuman as the hoped-for transcendence of materiality. In doing so, Wolfe reveals that it is humanism, not the human in all its embodied and prosthetic complexity, that is left behind in posthumanist thought.

Cary Wolfe holds the Bruce and Elizabeth Dunlevie Chair in English at Rice University. His previous books include Critical Environments: Postmodern Theory and the Pragmatics of the Outside, Observing Complexity: Systems Theory and Postmodernity, and Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal, all published by the University of Minnesota Press.

What Is Posthumanism? is an original, thoroughly argued, fundamental redefinition and refocusing of posthumanism. Firmly distinguishing posthumanism from discourses of the posthuman or transhumanism, this book will be at the center of discussion for a long time to come.

Donna Haraway, author of When Species Meet

Wolfe offers a smart, provocative account of posthumanism as an idea and as a way of thinking that has consequences extending from the way universities are organized to decisions regarding public policy bioethics. Although his writing is complex and demanding, the ethical and ecological urgency with which he frames his readings combines with the wide, diversified scope of his scholarship to make this a work to be reckoned with.

Wolfes book, without a doubt, supplies important insights.

Wolfe has created an incredibly useful primer on posthumanist theory. For anyone attempting to engage in academic work relating to these theories, this book is a highly recommended starting point.

Big Muddy: A Journal of the Mississippi River Valley

It is one of those books that sucks you in almost immediately.

ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment

Readers . . . will find Wolfes analysis of both visual and audio culture to be thought-provoking.

Science Fiction Film and Television

It is a profound, thoroughly researched study with far-reaching consequences for public policy, bioethics, education, and the arts.

Science, Culture, Integrated Yoga

What Is Posthumanism? is an intelligent, extensively argued and challenging work.

Wolfes work shifts the tired terms of the debate in new and needed directions, offering strength and strategies to all those for whom simplistic, technophilic accounts of the posthuman condition are a smooth road to nowhere different.

Electronic Book Review

Tremendous intellectual, scholarly, and artistic breadth.

As a blueprint for where a posthumanist approach could take cultural theory, his book is conceptually invaluable.

Wolfes posthumanism is brilliant in the way it allows us to realize that each of these species might have different forms of perception, different ways of being in the world, and that those differences are actually analogous with otherness among human beings.

Wolfe deserves credit for a rich set of discussions that, taken together, bring out the interest of the intellectual trend that he calls posthumanism.

UMP blog: Discovering the HUMAN

3/24/2010 Part of the unfortunate fallout of the conceptual apparatus of humanism is that it gives us an overly simple picturea fantasy, reallyof what the human is. Consider, for example, the rise of what is often called transhumanism, often taken to be a defining discourse of posthumanism (as in Ray Kurzweils work on the singularitythe historical moment at which engineering developments such as nanotechnology enable us to transcend our physical and biological limitations as embodied beings, ushering in a new phase of evolution). As many of its proponents freely admit, the philosophical ideals of transhumanism are quite identifiably humanistnot only in their dream of transcending the life of the body and our animal origins but also in their investment in the ideals of human perfectibility, rationality, autonomy, and agency. Read more …

See the original post here:

What Is Posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press

 Posted by at 7:28 am  Tagged with:

The Ethics of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research …

 Cloning  Comments Off on The Ethics of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research …
Jun 192016
 

“California Cloning: A Dialogue on State Regulation” was convened October 12, 2001, by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University. Its purpose was to bring together experts from the fields of science, religion, ethics, and law to discuss how the state of California should proceed in regulating human cloning and stem cell research.

A framework for discussing the issue was provided by Center Director of Biotechnology and Health Care Ethics Margaret McLean, who also serves on the California State Advisory Committee on Human Cloning. In 1997, the California legislature declared a “five year moratorium on cloning of an entire human being” and requested that “a panel of representatives from the fields of medicine, religion, biotechnology, genetics, law, bioethics and the general public” be established to evaluate the “medical, ethical and social implications” of human cloning (SB 1344). This 12-member Advisory Committee on Human Cloning convened five public meetings, each focusing on a particular aspect of human cloning: e.g., reproductive cloning, and cloning technology and stem cells. The committee is drafting a report to the legislature that is due on December 31, 2001. The report will discuss the science of cloning, and the ethical and legal considerations of applications of cloning technology. It will also set out recommendations to the legislature regarding regulation of human cloning. The legislature plans to take up this discussion after January. The moratorium expires the end of 2002.

What should the state do at that point? More than 80 invited guests came to SCU for “California Cloning” to engage in a dialogue on that question. These included scientists, theologians, businesspeople from the biotechnology industry, bioethicists, legal scholars, representatives of non-profits, and SCU faculty. Keynote Speaker Ursula Goodenough, professor of biology at Washington University and author of Genetics, set the issues in context with her talk, “A Religious Naturalist Thinks About Bioethics.” Four panels addressed the specific scientific, religious, ethical, and legal implications of human reproductive cloning and stem cell research. This document gives a brief summary of the issues as they were raised by the four panels.

Science and Biotechnology Perspectives

Thomas Okarma, CEO of Geron Corp., launched this panel with an overview of regenerative medicine and distinguished between reproductive cloning and human embryonic stem cell research. He helped the audience understand the science behind the medical potential of embryonic stem cell research, with an explanation of the procedures for creating stem cell lines and the relationship of this field to telomere biology and genetics. No brief summary could do justice to the science. The reader is referred to the report of the National Bioethics Advisory Committee (http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/nbac/stemcell.pdf) for a good introduction.

Responding to Okarma, were J. William Langston, president of the Parkinsons Institute, and Phyllis Gardner, associate professor of medicine and former dean for medical education at Stanford University. Both discussed the implications of the presidents recent restrictions on stem cell research for the non-profit sector. Langston compared the current regulatory environment to the Reagan era ban on fetal cell research, which he believed was a serious setback for Parkinsons research. He also pointed out that stem cell research was only being proposed using the thousands of embryos that were already being created in the process of fertility treatments. These would ultimately be disposed of in any event, he said, arguing that it would be better to allow them to serve some function rather than be destroyed. President Bush has confined federally-funded research to the 64 existing stem cell lines, far too few in Langstons view. In addition, Langston opposed bans on government funding for stem cell research because of the opportunities for public review afforded by the process of securing government grants.

Gardner talked about the differences between academic and commercial research, suggesting that both were important for the advancement of science and its application. Since most of the current stem cell lines are in the commercial sector and the president has banned the creation of new lines, she worried that universities would not continue to be centers of research in this important area. That, she argued, would cut out the more serendipitous and sometimes more altruistic approaches of academic research. Also, it might lead to more of the brain drain represented by the recent move of prominent UCSF stem cell researcher Roger Pedersen to Britain. Gardner expressed a hope that the United States would continue to be the “flagship” in stem cell research. Her concerns were echoed later by moderator Allen Hammond, SCU law professor, who urged the state, which has been at the forefront of stem cell research to consider the economic impact of banning such activity. All three panelists commended the decision of the state advisory committee to deal separately with the issues of human cloning and stem cell research.

Religious Perspectives

Two religion panelists, Suzanne Holland and Laurie Zoloth, are co editors of The Human Embryonic Stem Cell Debate: Science, Ethics and Public Policy (MIT Press, 2001). Holland, assistant professor of Religious and Social Ethics at the University of Puget Sound, began the panel with a discussion of Protestant ideas about the sin of pride and respect for persons and how these apply to human reproductive cloning. Given current safety concerns about cloning, she was in favor of a continuing ban. But ultimately, she argued, cloning should be regulated rather than banned outright. In fact, she suggested, the entire fertility industry requires more regulation. As a basis for such regulation, she proposed assessing the motivation of those who want to use the technology. Those whose motives arise from benevolence–for example, those who want to raise a child but have no other means of bearing a genetically related baby–should be allowed to undergo a cloning procedure. Those whose motives arise more from narcissistic considerations — people who want immortality or novelty — should be prohibited from using the technology. She proposed mandatory counseling and a waiting period as a means of assessing motivation.

Zoloth reached a different conclusion about reproductive cloning based on her reading of Jewish sources. She argued that the availability of such technology would make human life too easily commodified, putting the emphasis more on achieving a copy of the self than on the crucial parental act of creating “a stranger to whom you would give your life.” She put the cloning issue in the context of a system where foster children cannot find homes and where universal health care is not available for babies who have already been born. While Zoloth reported that Jewish ethicists vary considerably in their views about reproductive cloning, there is fairly broad agreement that stem cell research is justified. Among the Jewish traditions she cited were:

The embryo does not have the status of a human person.

There is a commandment to heal.

Great latitude is permitted for learning.

The world is uncompleted and requires human participation to become whole.

Catholic bioethicist Albert Jonsen, one of the deans of the field, gave a historical perspective on the cloning debate, citing a paper by Joshua Lederburg in the 1960s, which challenged his colleagues to look at the implications of the then-remote possibility. He also traced the development of Catholic views on other new medical technologies. When organ transplantation was first introduced, it was opposed as a violation of the principal, “First, do no harm” and as a mutilation of the human body. Later, the issue was reconceived in terms of charity and concern for others. One of the key questions, Jonsen suggested, is What can we, as a society that promotes religious pluralism, do when we must make public policy on issues where religious traditions may disagree. He argued that beneath the particular teachings of each religion are certain broad themes they share, which might provide a framework for the debate. These include human finitude, human fallibility, human dignity, and compassion.

Ethics Perspectives

Lawrence Nelson, adjunct associate professor of philosophy at SCU, opened the ethics panel with a discussion of the moral status of the human embryo. Confining his remarks to viable, extracorporeal embryos (embryos created for fertility treatments that were never implanted), Nelson argued that these beings do have some moral status–albeit it weak–because they are alive and because they are valued to varying degrees by other moral agents. This status does entitle the embryo to some protection. In Nelsons view, the gamete sources whose egg and sperm created these embryos have a unique connection to them and should have exclusive control over their disposition. If the gamete sources agree, Nelson believes the embryos can be used for research if they are treated respectfully. Some manifestations of respect might be:

They are used only if the goal of the research cannot be obtained by other methods.

The embryos have not reached gastrulation (prior to 14 to 18 days of development).

Those who use them avoid considering or treating them as property.

Their destruction is accompanied by some sense of loss or sorrow.

Philosophy Professor Barbara MacKinnon (University of San Francisco), editor of Human Cloning: Science, Ethics, and Public Policy, began by discussing the distinction between reproductive and therapeutic cloning and the slippery slope argument. She distinguished three different forms of this argument and showed that for each, pursuing stem cell research will not inevitably lead to human reproductive cloning. MacKinnon favored a continuing ban on the latter, citing safety concerns. Regarding therapeutic cloning and stem cell research, she criticized consequentialist views such as that anything can be done to reduce human suffering and that certain embryos would perish anyway. However, she noted that non-consequentialist concerns must also be addressed for therapeutic cloning, among them the question of the moral status of the early embryo. She also made a distinction between morality and the law, arguing that not everything that is immoral ought to be prohibited by law, and showed how this position relates to human cloning.

Paul Billings, co-founder of GeneSage, has been involved in crafting an international treaty to ban human reproductive cloning and germ-line genetic engineering. As arguments against human cloning he cited:

There is no right to have a genetically related child.

Cloning is not safe.

Cloning is not medically necessary.

Cloning could not be delivered in an equitable manner.

Billings also believes that the benefits of stem cell therapies have been “wildly oversold.” Currently, he argues, there are no effective treatments coming from this research. He is also concerned about how developing abilities in nuclear transfer technology may have applications in germ-line genetic engineering that we do not want to encourage. As a result, he favors the current go-slow approach of banning the creation of new cell lines until some therapies have been proven effective. At the same time, he believes we must work to better the situation of the poor and marginalized so their access to all therapies is improved.

Legal Perspectives

Member of the State Advisory Committee on Human Cloning Henry “Hank” Greely addressed some of the difficulties in creating a workable regulatory system for human reproductive cloning. First he addressed safety, which, considering the 5 to 10 times greater likelihood of spontaneous abortion in cloned sheep, he argued clearly justifies regulation. The FDA has currently claimed jurisdiction over this technology, but Greely doubted whether the courts would uphold this claim. Given these facts, Greely saw three alternatives for the state of California:

Do nothing; let the federal government take care of it.

Create an FDA equivalent to regulate the safety of the process, an alternative he pointed out for which the state has no experience.

Continue the current ban on the grounds of safety until such time as the procedure is adjudged safe. Next Greely responded to suggestions that the state might regulate by distinguishing between prospective cloners on the basis of their motivation, for example, denying a request to clone a person to provide heart tissue for another person but okaying a request if cloning were the only opportunity a couple might have to conceive a child. Greely found the idea of the state deciding on such basis deeply troubling because it would necessitate “peering into someones soul” in a manner that government is not adept at doing.

The impact of regulation on universities was the focus of Debra Zumwalts presentation. As Stanford University general counsel, Zumwalt talked about the necessity of creating regulations that are clear and simple. Currently, federal regulations on stem cells are unclear, she argued, making it difficult for universities and other institutions to tell if they are in compliance. She believes that regulations should be based on science and good public policy rather than on politics. As a result, she favored overall policy being set by the legislature but details being worked out at the administrative level by regulatory agencies with expertise. Whatever regulations California develops should not be more restrictive than the federal regulations, she warned, or research would be driven out of the state. Like several other speakers, Zumwalt was concerned about federal regulations restricting stem cell research to existing cell lines. That, she feared, would drive all research into private hands. “We must continue to have a public knowledge base,” she said. Also, she praised the inherent safeguards in academic research including peer review, ethics panels, and institutional review boards.

SCU Presidential Professor of Ethics and the Common Good June Carbone looked at the role of California cloning decisions in contributing to the governance of biotechnology. California, she suggested, cannot address these issues alone, and thus might make the most useful contribution by helping to forge a new international moral consensus through public debate. Taking a lesson from U.S. response to recent terrorist attacks, she argued for international consensus based on the alliance of principle and self-interest. Such consensus would need to be enforced both by carrot and stick and should, she said, include a public-private partnership to deal with ethical issues. Applying these ideas to reproductive cloning, she suggested that we think about which alliances would be necessary to prevent or limit the practice. Preventing routine use might be accomplished by establishing a clear ethical and professional line prohibiting reproductive cloning. Preventing exceptional use (a determined person with sufficient money to find a willing doctor) might not be possible. As far as stem cell research is concerned, Carbone argued that the larger the investment in such research, the bigger the carrot–the more the funder would be able to regulate the process. That, she suggested, argues for a government role in the funding. If the professional community does not respect the ethical line drawn by politicians, and alternative funding is available from either public sources abroad or private sources at home, the U.S. political debate runs the risk of becoming irrelevant.

“California Cloning” was organized by the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics and co-sponsored by the Bannan Center for Jesuit Education and Christian Values; the Center for Science, Technology, and Society; the SCU School of Law; the High Tech Law Institute; the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Community of Science Scholars Initiative; and the law firm of Latham & Watkins.

Original post:

The Ethics of Human Cloning and Stem Cell Research …

 Posted by at 2:37 pm  Tagged with:

Rocket SEO | Affordable Search Engine Optimisation in …

 SEO  Comments Off on Rocket SEO | Affordable Search Engine Optimisation in …
May 212016
 

Search Engine Optimisation

Speak to our experienced link building team about your SEO needs. We source and build a wide array of links from trusted sources to ensure your site gains natural backlink authority, safeguarding longevity and stability for your ranks.

Getting your house in order is vital to being correctly and properly ranked. Our on-site SEO team will check the nuts and bolts of your site and suggest proven changes that will bring you much needed traffic and increased organic ranks across the board.

Received a manual action notice from Google? Don’t panic, all is not lost! Our teams proven track record of successfully having penalties revoked by Google is second to none. Speak to us for help today and get your business back on track.

Social signals are more important than ever in your quest for online exposure. We know how to utilise social media to your best advantage for SEO and online reputation enhancement. If you want to get ahead, you need to get social!

Whether youre a small local business, a national brand or someone with huge global ambitions, we have the knowledge and capability to tailor an effective internet marketing strategy to suit your needs.

With so many internet marketing options out there, its easy to feel confused and frustrated about where to go and who to trust with your SEO requirements. Our message is simple judge us by our results!

Weve worked with dozens of firms just like you who had one common goal. That goal was to find more customers via the search engines.

We treat each of our clients with equal importance and dedication to ensure you feel that your trust and investment in us is valued. Thats why more and more businesses are turning to Rocket SEO because we deliver the very best results and return on your investment.

We want you to be happy so its our job to ensure that we provide you with a quality service that includes full transparency, detailed monthly reporting and that all-important friendly customer service.

We aim to build long-term relationships with our clients so when you work with us, you know you are getting a solid UK based search engine optimisation team behind you that is there when you need us.

Need a reputable and affordable SEO service? Speak to ustoday.

See the original post:
Rocket SEO | Affordable Search Engine Optimisation in …

Portland SEO Expert | Search Engine Optimization Pros

 SEO  Comments Off on Portland SEO Expert | Search Engine Optimization Pros
Apr 242016
 

To expand your business reach, you need to use effective and helpful methods. In the highly advanced world of today, websites are an effective medium that businesses use for promoting their activities and events. There are many things that you need to consider before you start to make use of search engine optimization services.

They include the following: your visitors interests, the scope and size of your business and much more. PDX SEO is a great option if you are looking to generate massive amounts of traffic to your website. We have an entire team of experienced SEO professionals ready to assist you. Our knowledge of Search Engine Optimization will help to set your business apart from your competitors.

The following are some of the major benefits that a Portland SEO Firm can provide to you:

Create a user-friendly and functional website:

PDX SEO assists business owners, particularly those who are new to creating websites, build a friendlier, faster and better website for their online business. When it comes to Search Engine Marketing, it involves focusing on the quality of the user experience that your visitors have as much as it does to please the search engines.

When your visitors are pleased with your website, the search engines will also be happy. SEO involves the rearrangement of links and the architecture of the website to make navigating through the pages of a website a much easier thing to do. PDX SEO utilizes first-rate on-page SEO methods to improve your visitors user experience, which creates several long term and short term benefits.

Generate traffic:

One of the greatest advantages you will get from hiring a Portland SEO Company is all of the added traffic that is generated for your site. The main way this is achieved is through selecting the proper keywords. It has been repeatedly proven that it increases the amount of traffic to a website.

Our firms art of SEO also helps you convert your visitors into customers. The experts at PDX SEO ensure that they use only the finest and most effective Search Engine Optimization methods that can increase your website traffic significantly. The more traffic that you receive, the higher the sales will be for your business.

Stay ahead of your competition:

One of the easiest and fastest ways to get ahead of the competition is to optimize your website with help from experts in Portland Search Engine Optimization. Consider two businesses that are selling the same products and the same prices within the same industry. One has a non-optimized web presence, and the other one utilizes SEO.

With everything else being equal, the business that has an optimized website will be much more successful since it can obtain many more customers via Search Engine Marketing. This will allow the business to expand much faster.

Improve your brands credibility:

Obtaining the top rankings position will provide you with a significant number of impressions. That is why getting your website to the top spots in the results pages provides your website with increased exposure. There is a simple reason for this: everybody trusts that Google and other popular search engines will deliver results that are the most relevant to their queries.

When you hire Portland SEO services, it will normally result in your site ranking at the top of the search results. That means that the more high ranking pages you have, the more chances you have of your target customers seeing you and your brand improving.

High Return On Investment:

It will require an initial investment to have your website built and to hire a Portland SEO Agency for providing various SEO services. However, since those services can be expected to produce great results, you will be able to generate a great return on investment. Whether your site is a non-commerce or e-commerce website, PDX SEO can offer you a quantifiable result and will monitor your progress.

Therefore, you will not need to worry about gaining your initial investment back. They are equipped with all of the necessary tools for tracking virtually all aspects of the SEM services they are providing, including conversion rates, daily ranking changes and increases in traffic. They offer a comprehensive analytic program with the ability to drill down to see website metrics, demographic information and other types of engagement metrics, allowing you to have a clear view of the areas that you can improve upon.

Find potential customers:

When you hire PDX SEO, if you have the ability to target precisely the type of audience that you want, which is those people that are especially searching for the services and products that you offer. That will certainly lead to an increase in sales overall as well as profit margins.

Improve conversion rates

Portland SEO service companies ensure that your site is optimized well. That means that it is compatible with various mobile devices, is easy and convenient to use and that it runs fast. Another thing that will improve conversions is to have a mobile-friendly website.

Provides permanent results:

Unlike traditional advertising methods, Portland SEO services can deliver long-term results. The effects that you can achieve from SEO services that are of high quality will not stop suddenly after you stop using the services of the professional SEO firm. Some maintenance work will need to be done to make sure that your website stays in the top spot. However, if you get it into that position, there is a very good chance that other websites will have a tough time trying to surpass you in the rankings.

Long term results:

Unlike other methods such as PPC, you can enjoy ranking on the major search engines on a long term basis with assistance from Portland SEO. This can prove to be among the best marketing strategies that you can use since their services are so cost-effective and affordable.

If you are thinking about using Portland SEM services to take care of your business SEO needs, then there are a few things that you need to carefully consider. First of all, research the track records of several service providers to determine how capable the firms will be regarding the type of work that you need for them to do for you. Ask if they can customize their services to provide solutions to you that specifically meet your business needs. Also, be sure to compare the prices being charged by several service providers to ensure that the rates are reasonable. After you have completed this process, you can then hired Portland SEM services to help your business achieve its objectives.

PDX SEO is a great way to promote your services and products to a broad range o customers. It will provide your business with increased visibility, and each day of the year.

Read the original post:
Portland SEO Expert | Search Engine Optimization Pros

Wage slavery – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Wage Slavery  Comments Off on Wage slavery – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Mar 262016
 

Wage slavery refers to a situation where a person’s livelihood depends on wages or a salary, especially when the dependence is total and immediate.[1][2] It is a pejorative term used to draw an analogy between slavery and wage labor by focusing on similarities between owning and renting a person.

The term wage slavery has been used to criticize exploitation of labour and social stratification, with the former seen primarily as unequal bargaining power between labor and capital (particularly when workers are paid comparatively low wages, e.g. in sweatshops),[3] and the latter as a lack of workers’ self-management, fulfilling job choices, and leisure in an economy.[4][5][6] The criticism of social stratification covers a wider range of employment choices bound by the pressures of a hierarchical society to perform otherwise unfulfilling work that deprives humans of their “species character”[7] not only under threat of starvation or poverty, but also of social stigma and status diminution.[8][9][10]

Similarities between wage labor and slavery were noted as early as Cicero in Ancient Rome.[11] With the advent of the industrial revolution, thinkers such as Proudhon and Marx elaborated the comparison between wage labor and slavery in the context of a critique of societal property not intended for active personal use,[12][13] while Luddites emphasized the dehumanization brought about by machines. Before the American Civil War, Southern defenders of African American slavery invoked the concept of wage slavery to favorably compare the condition of their slaves to workers in the North.[14][15] The United States abolished slavery after the Civil War, but labor union activists found the metaphor useful. According to Lawrence Glickman, in the Gilded Age, “References abounded in the labor press, and it is hard to find a speech by a labor leader without the phrase.”[16]

The introduction of wage labor in 18th century Britain was met with resistance&emdash;giving rise to the principles of syndicalism.[17][18][19][20] Historically, some labor organizations and individual social activists have espoused workers’ self-management or worker cooperatives as possible alternatives to wage labor.[5][19]

The view that working for wages is akin to slavery dates back to the ancient world.[22]

In 1763, the French journalist Simon Linguet published a description of wage slavery:[13]

The slave was precious to his master because of the money he had cost him … They were worth at least as much as they could be sold for in the market … It is the impossibility of living by any other means that compels our farm labourers to till the soil whose fruits they will not eat and our masons to construct buildings in which they will not live … It is want that compels them to go down on their knees to the rich man in order to get from him permission to enrich him … what effective gain [has] the suppression of slavery brought [him?] He is free, you say. Ah! That is his misfortune … These men … [have] the most terrible, the most imperious of masters, that is, need. … They must therefore find someone to hire them, or die of hunger. Is that to be free?

The view that wage work has substantial similarities with chattel slavery was actively put forward in the late 18th and 19th centuries by defenders of chattel slavery (most notably in the Southern states of the US), and by opponents of capitalism (who were also critics of chattel slavery).[9][23] Some defenders of slavery, mainly from the Southern slave states argued that Northern workers were “free but in name the slaves of endless toil,” and that their slaves were better off.[24][25] This contention has been partly corroborated by some modern studies that indicate slaves’ material conditions in the 19th century were “better than what was typically available to free urban laborers at the time.”[26][27] In this period, Henry David Thoreau wrote that “[i]t is hard to have a Southern overseer; it is worse to have a Northern one; but worst of all when you are the slave-driver of yourself.”[28]

Some abolitionists in the United States regarded the analogy as spurious.[29] They believed that wage workers were “neither wronged nor oppressed”.[30]Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans argued that the condition of wage workers was different from slavery, as laborers were likely to have the opportunity to work for themselves in the future, achieving self-employment.[31] The abolitionist and former slave Frederick Douglass initially declared, “now I am my own master”, upon taking a paying job.[32] But later in life, he concluded to the contrary, “experience demonstrates that there may be a slavery of wages only a little less galling and crushing in its effects than chattel slavery, and that this slavery of wages must go down with the other”.[33][34] Douglass went on to speak about these conditions as arising from the unequal bargaining power between the ownership/capitalist class and the non-ownership/laborer class within a compulsory monetary market. “No more crafty and effective devise for defrauding the southern laborers could be adopted than the one that substitutes orders upon shopkeepers for currency in payment of wages. It has the merit of a show of honesty, while it puts the laborer completely at the mercy of the land-owner and the shopkeeper.”.[35]

Self-employment became less common as the artisan tradition slowly disappeared in the later part of the 19th century.[5] In 1869 The New York Times described the system of wage labor as “a system of slavery as absolute if not as degrading as that which lately prevailed at the South”.[31]E. P. Thompson notes that for British workers at the end of the 18th and beginning of the 19th centuries, the “gap in status between a ‘servant,’ a hired wage-laborer subject to the orders and discipline of the master, and an artisan, who might ‘come and go’ as he pleased, was wide enough for men to shed blood rather than allow themselves to be pushed from one side to the other. And, in the value system of the community, those who resisted degradation were in the right.”[17] A “Member of the Builders’ Union” in the 1830s argued that the trade unions “will not only strike for less work, and more wages, but will ultimately abolish wages, become their own masters and work for each other; labor and capital will no longer be separate but will be indissolubly joined together in the hands of workmen and work-women.”[18] This perspective inspired the Grand National Consolidated Trades Union of 1834 which had the “two-fold purpose of syndicalist unions the protection of the workers under the existing system and the formation of the nuclei of the future society” when the unions “take over the whole industry of the country.”[19] “Research has shown”, summarises William Lazonick, “that the ‘free-born Englishman’ of the eighteenth century even those who, by force of circumstance, had to submit to agricultural wage labour tenaciously resisted entry into the capitalist workshop.”[20]

The use of the term wage slave by labor organizations may originate from the labor protests of the Lowell Mill Girls in 1836.[36] The imagery of wage slavery was widely used by labor organizations during the mid-19th century to object to the lack of workers’ self-management. However, it was gradually replaced by the more neutral term “wage work” towards the end of the 19th century, as labor organizations shifted their focus to raising wages.[5]

Karl Marx described Capitalist society as infringing on individual autonomy, by basing it on a materialistic and commodified concept of the body and its liberty (i.e. as something that is sold, rented or alienated in a class society). According to Friedrich Engels:[37][38]

The slave is sold once and for all; the proletarian must sell himself daily and hourly. The individual slave, property of one master, is assured an existence, however miserable it may be, because of the master’s interest. The individual proletarian, property as it were of the entire bourgeois class which buys his labor only when someone has need of it, has no secure existence.

Critics of wage work have drawn several similarities between wage work and slavery:

According to American anarcho-syndicalist philosopher Noam Chomsky, the similarities between chattel and wage slavery were noticed by the workers themselves. He noted that the 19th century Lowell Mill Girls, who, without any reported knowledge of European Marxism or anarchism, condemned the “degradation and subordination” of the newly emerging industrial system, and the “new spirit of the age: gain wealth, forgetting all but self”, maintaining that “those who work in the mills should own them.”[44][45] They expressed their concerns in a protest song during their 1836 strike:

Oh! isn’t it a pity, such a pretty girl as I Should be sent to the factory to pine away and die? Oh! I cannot be a slave, I will not be a slave, For I’m so fond of liberty, That I cannot be a slave.[46]

Defenses of wage labor and chattel slavery in the literature have linked the subjection of man to man with the subjection of man to nature; arguing that hierarchy and a social system’s particular relations of production represent human nature and are no more coercive than the reality of life itself. According to this narrative, any well-intentioned attempt to fundamentally change the status quo is naively utopian and will result in more oppressive conditions.[47] Bosses in both of these long-lasting systems argued that their system created a lot of wealth and prosperity. Both did, in some sense create jobs and their investment entailed risk. For example, slave owners might have risked losing money by buying expensive slaves who later became ill or died; or might have used those slaves to make products that didn’t sell well on the market. Marginally, both chattel and wage slaves may become bosses; sometimes by working hard. It may be the “rags to riches” story which occasionally occurs in capitalism, or the “slave to master” story that occurred in places like colonial Brazil, where slaves could buy their own freedom and become business owners, self-employed, or slave owners themselves.[48] Social mobility, or the hard work and risk that it may entail, are thus not considered to be a redeeming factor by critics of the concept of wage slavery.[49]

Anthropologist David Graeber has noted that, historically, the first wage labor contracts we know about whether in ancient Greece or Rome, or in the Malay or Swahili city states in the Indian ocean were in fact contracts for the rental of chattel slaves (usually the owner would receive a share of the money, and the slave, another, with which to maintain his or her living expenses.) Such arrangements, according to Graeber, were quite common in New World slavery as well, whether in the United States or Brazil. C. L. R. James argued that most of the techniques of human organization employed on factory workers during the industrial revolution were first developed on slave plantations.[50]

The usage of the term “wage slavery” shifted to “wage work” at the end of the 19th century as groups like the Knights of Labor and American Federation of Labor shifted to a more reformist, trade union ideology instead of worker’s self-management. Much of the decline was caused by the rapid increase in manufacturing after the industrial revolution and the subsequent dominance of wage labor as a result. Another factor was immigration and demographic changes that led to ethnic tension between the workers.[5]

As Hallgrimsdottir and Benoit point out:

increased centralization of production… declining wages… [an] expanding… labor pool… intensifying competition, and… [t]he loss of competence and independence experienced by skilled labor” meant that “a critique that referred to all [wage] work as slavery and avoided demands for wage concessions in favor of supporting the creation of the producerist republic (by diverting strike funds towards funding… co-operatives, for example) was far less compelling than one that identified the specific conditions of slavery as low wages…[5]

Some anti-capitalist thinkers claim that the elite maintain wage slavery and a divided working class through their influence over the media and entertainment industry,[51][52] educational institutions, unjust laws, nationalist and corporate propaganda, pressures and incentives to internalize values serviceable to the power structure, state violence, fear of unemployment[53] and a historical legacy of exploitation and profit accumulation/transfer under prior systems, which shaped the development of economic theory:

Adam Smith noted that employers often conspire together to keep wages low, and have the upper hand in conflicts between workers and employers:[54]

The interest of the dealers… in any particular branch of trade or manufactures, is always in some respects different from, and even opposite to, that of the public [They] have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public We rarely hear, it has been said, of the combinations of masters, though frequently of those of workmen. But whoever imagines, upon this account, that masters rarely combine, is as ignorant of the world as of the subject. Masters are always and everywhere in a sort of tacit, but constant and uniform combination, not to raise the wages of labor above their actual rate It is not, however, difficult to foresee which of the two parties must, upon all ordinary occasions, have the advantage in the dispute, and force the other into a compliance with their terms.

The concept of wage slavery could conceivably be traced back to pre-capitalist figures like Gerrard Winstanley from the radical Christian Diggers movement in England, who wrote in his 1649 pamphlet, The New Law of Righteousness, that there “shall be no buying or selling, no fairs nor markets, but the whole earth shall be a common treasury for every man,” and “there shall be none Lord over others, but every one shall be a Lord of himself.”[55]

Aristotle stated that “the citizens must not live a mechanic or a mercantile life (for such a life is ignoble and inimical to virtue), nor yet must those who are to be citizens in the best state be tillers of the soil (for leisure is needed both for the development of virtue and for active participation in politics)”,[56] often paraphrased as “all paid jobs absorb and degrade the mind.”[57]Cicero wrote in 44 BC that “vulgar are the means of livelihood of all hired workmen whom we pay for mere manual labour, not for artistic skill; for in their case the very wage they receive is a pledge of their slavery.”[58] Somewhat similar criticisms have also been expressed by some proponents of liberalism, like Henry George,[9]Silvio Gesell, and Thomas Paine,[59] as well as the Distributist school of thought within the Catholic Church.

To Marx and anarchist thinkers like Bakunin and Kropotkin, wage slavery was a class condition in place due to the existence of private property and the state. This class situation rested primarily on:

and secondarily on:

Proponents of anarcho-capitalism such as John Frederic Kosanke, in contrast, believe that in the absence of restrictive statutory regulations and political cronyism, the natural pursuit of property and capital allows a positive sum enrichment of all actors. Employers and employees, as buyers and sellers of services, become peers on an equal footing.[61]

Fascism was more hostile against independent trade unions than modern economies in Europe or the United States.[62] Fascist economic policies were widely accepted in the 1920s and 1930s and foreign (especially US) corporate investment in Italy and Germany increased after the fascist take over.[63][64]

Fascism has been perceived by some notable critics, like Buenaventura Durruti, to be a last resort weapon of the privileged to ensure the maintenance of wage slavery:

No government fights fascism to destroy it. When the bourgeoisie sees that power is slipping out of its hands, it brings up fascism to hold onto their privileges.[65]

According to Noam Chomsky, analysis of the psychological implications of wage slavery goes back to the Enlightenment era. In his 1791 book On the Limits of State Action, classical liberal thinker Wilhelm von Humboldt explained how “whatever does not spring from a man’s free choice, or is only the result of instruction and guidance, does not enter into his very nature; he does not perform it with truly human energies, but merely with mechanical exactness” and so when the laborer works under external control, “we may admire what he does, but we despise what he is.”[66] Both the Milgram and Stanford experiments have been found useful in the psychological study of wage-based workplace relations.[67]

According to research, modern work provides people with a sense of personal and social identity that is tied to

Thus job loss entails the loss of this identity.[68]

Erich Fromm argued that if a person perceives himself as being what he owns, then when that person loses (or even thinks of losing) what he “owns” (e.g. the good looks or sharp mind that allow him to sell his labor for high wages), then, a fear of loss may create anxiety and authoritarian tendencies because that person’s sense of identity is threatened. In contrast, when a person’s sense of self is based on what he experiences in a state of being (creativity, love, sadness, taste, sight etc.) with a less materialistic regard for what he once had and lost, or may lose, then less authoritarian tendencies prevail. The state of being, in his view, flourishes under a worker-managed workplace and economy, whereas self-ownership entails a materialistic notion of self, created to rationalize the lack of worker control that would allow for a state of being.[69]

Investigative journalist Robert Kuttner analyzed the work of public-health scholars Jeffrey Johnson and Ellen Hall about modern conditions of work, and concludes that “to be in a life situation where one experiences relentless demands by others, over which one has relatively little control, is to be at risk of poor health, physically as well as mentally.” Under wage labor, “a relatively small elite demands and gets empowerment, self-actualization, autonomy, and other work satisfaction that partially compensate for long hours” while “epidemiological data confirm that lower-paid, lower-status workers are more likely to experience the most clinically damaging forms of stress, in part because they have less control over their work.”[70]

Wage slavery, and the educational system that precedes it “implies power held by the leader. Without power the leader is inept. The possession of power inevitably leads to corruption in spite of good intentions [Leadership means] power of initiative, this sense of responsibility, the self-respect which comes from expressed manhood, is taken from the men, and consolidated in the leader. The sum of their initiative, their responsibility, their self-respect becomes his [and the] order and system he maintains is based upon the suppression of the men, from being independent thinkers into being ‘the men’ In a word, he is compelled to become an autocrat and a foe to democracy.” For the “leader”, such marginalisation can be beneficial, for a leader “sees no need for any high level of intelligence in the rank and file, except to applaud his actions. Indeed such intelligence from his point of view, by breeding criticism and opposition, is an obstacle and causes confusion.”[71] Wage slavery “implies erosion of the human personality [because] some men submit to the will of others, arousing in these instincts which predispose them to cruelty and indifference in the face of the suffering of their fellows.”[72]

In 19th-century discussions of labor relations, it was normally assumed that the threat of starvation forced those without property to work for wages. Proponents of the view that modern forms of employment constitute wage slavery, even when workers appear to have a range of available alternatives, have attributed its perpetuation to a variety of social factors that maintain the hegemony of the employer class.[43][73]

Harriet Hanson Robinson in an account of the Lowell Mill Girls wrote that generously high wages were offered to overcome the degrading nature of the work:

At the time the Lowell cotton mills were started the caste of the factory girl was the lowest among the employments of women. … She was represented as subjected to influences that must destroy her purity and selfrespect. In the eyes of her overseer she was but a brute, a slave, to be beaten, pinched and pushed about. It was to overcome this prejudice that such high wages had been offered to women that they might be induced to become millgirls, in spite of the opprobrium that still clung to this degrading occupation.[74]

In his book Disciplined Minds, Jeff Schmidt points out that professionals are trusted to run organizations in the interests of their employers. Because employers cannot be on hand to manage every decision, professionals are trained to ensure that each and every detail of their work favors the right interestsor skewers the disfavored ones in the absence of overt control:

The resulting professional is an obedient thinker, an intellectual property whom employers can trust to experiment, theorize, innovate and create safely within the confines of an assigned ideology.[75]

Parecon (participatory economics) theory posits a social class “between labor and capital” of higher paid professionals such as “doctors, lawyers, engineers, managers and others” who monopolize empowering labor and constitute a class above wage laborers who do mostly “obedient, rote work”.[76]

The terms “employee” or “worker” have often been replaced by “associate”. This plays up the allegedly voluntary nature of the interaction, while playing down the subordinate status of the wage laborer, as well as the worker-boss class distinction emphasized by labor movements. Billboards, as well as TV, Internet and newspaper advertisements, consistently show low-wage workers with smiles on their faces, appearing happy.[77]

Job interviews and other data on requirements for lower skilled workers in developed countries particularly in the growing service sector indicate that the more workers depend on low wages, and the less skilled or desirable their job is, the more employers screen for workers without better employment options and expect them to feign unremunerative motivation.[78] Such screening and feigning may not only contribute to the positive self-image of the employer as someone granting desirable employment, but also signal wage-dependence by indicating the employee’s willingness to feign, which in turn may discourage the dissatisfaction normally associated with job-switching or union activity.[78]

At the same time, employers in the service industry have justified unstable, part-time employment and low wages by playing down the importance of service jobs for the lives of the wage laborers (e.g. just temporary before finding something better, student summer jobs etc.).[79][80]

In the early 20th century, “scientific methods of strikebreaking”[81] were devised employing a variety of tactics that emphasized how strikes undermined “harmony” and “Americanism”.[82]

Some social activists objecting to the market system or price system of wage working, historically have considered syndicalism, worker cooperatives, workers’ self-management and workers’ control as possible alternatives to the current wage system.[4][5][6][19]

The American philosopher John Dewey believed that until “industrial feudalism” is replaced by “industrial democracy,” politics will be “the shadow cast on society by big business”.[83]Thomas Ferguson has postulated in his investment theory of party competition that the undemocratic nature of economic institutions under capitalism causes elections to become occasions when blocs of investors coalesce and compete to control the state.[84]

Noam Chomsky has argued that political theory tends to blur the ‘elite’ function of government:

Modern political theory stresses Madison’s belief that “in a just and a free government the rights both of property and of persons ought to be effectually guarded.” But in this case too it is useful to look at the doctrine more carefully. There are no rights of property, only rights to property that is, rights of persons with property,…

[In] representative democracy, as in, say, the United States or Great Britain […] there is a monopoly of power centralized in the state, and secondly and critically […] the representative democracy is limited to the political sphere and in no serious way encroaches on the economic sphere […] That is, as long as individuals are compelled to rent themselves on the market to those who are willing to hire them, as long as their role in production is simply that of ancillary tools, then there are striking elements of coercion and oppression that make talk of democracy very limited, if even meaningful.[85]

In this regard Chomsky has used Bakunin’s theories about an “instinct for freedom”,[86] the militant history of labor movements, Kropotkin’s mutual aid evolutionary principle of survival and Marc Hauser’s theories supporting an innate and universal moral faculty,[87] to explain the incompatibility of oppression with certain aspects of human nature.[88][89]

Loyola University philosophy professor John Clark and libertarian socialist philosopher Murray Bookchin have criticized the system of wage labor for encouraging environmental destruction, arguing that a self-managed industrial society would better manage the environment. They, like other anarchists,[90] attribute much of the industrial revolution’s pollution to the “hierarchical” and “competitive” economic relations accompanying it.[91]

Some criticize wage slavery on strictly contractual grounds, e.g. David Ellerman and Carole Pateman, arguing that the employment contract is a legal fiction in that it treats human beings juridically as mere tools or inputs by abdicating responsibility and self-determination, which the critics argue are inalienable. As Ellerman points out, “[t]he employee is legally transformed from being a co-responsible partner to being only an input supplier sharing no legal responsibility for either the input liabilities [costs] or the produced outputs [revenue, profits] of the employer’s business.”[92] Such contracts are inherently invalid “since the person remain[s] a de facto fully capacitated adult person with only the contractual role of a non-person” as it is impossible to physically transfer self-determination.[93] As Pateman argues:

The contractarian argument is unassailable all the time it is accepted that abilities can ‘acquire’ an external relation to an individual, and can be treated as if they were property. To treat abilities in this manner is also implicitly to accept that the ‘exchange’ between employer and worker is like any other exchange of material property … The answer to the question of how property in the person can be contracted out is that no such procedure is possible. Labour power, capacities or services, cannot be separated from the person of the worker like pieces of property.[94]

In a modern liberal-capitalist society, the employment contract is enforced while the enslavement contract is not; the former being considered valid because of its consensual/non-coercive nature, and the later being considered inherently invalid, consensual or not. The noted economist Paul Samuelson described this discrepancy.

Since slavery was abolished, human earning power is forbidden by law to be

capitalized. A man is not even free to sell himself; he must rent himself at a wage.[95]

Some advocates of right-libertarianism, among them philosopher Robert Nozick, address this inconsistency in modern societies, arguing that a consistently libertarian society would allow and regard as valid consensual/non-coercive enslavement contracts, rejecting the notion of inalienable rights.

The comparable question about an individual is whether a free system will allow him to sell himself into slavery. I believe that it would.[96]

Others like Murray Rothbard allow for the possibility of debt slavery, asserting that a lifetime labour contract can be broken so long as the slave pays appropriate damages:

[I]f A has agreed to work for life for B in exchange for 10,000 grams of gold, he will have to return the proportionate amount of property if he terminates the arrangement and ceases to work.[97]

In the philosophy of mainstream, neoclassical economics, wage labor is seen as the voluntary sale of one’s own time and efforts, just like a carpenter would sell a chair, or a farmer would sell wheat. It is considered neither an antagonistic nor abusive relationship, and carries no particular moral implications.[98]

Austrian economics argues that a person is not “free” unless they can sell their labor, because otherwise that person has no self-ownership and will be owned by a “third party” of individuals.[99]

Post-Keynesian economics perceives wage slavery as resulting from inequality of bargaining power between labor and capital, which exists when the economy does not “allow labor to organize and form a strong countervailing force.”[100]

The two main forms of socialist economics perceive wage slavery differently:

Continue reading here:

Wage slavery – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Posted by at 8:44 am  Tagged with:

Denver SEO – #1 Search Engine Optimization Company – SEO Denver

 SEO  Comments Off on Denver SEO – #1 Search Engine Optimization Company – SEO Denver
Feb 072016
 

Looking for a reliable Denver SEO expert? Since 1996, Colorado SEO has specialized in providing organic search engine optimization (SEO) and internet marketing services to businesses worldwide.

Our team of seasoned SEO consultants fully understand what it takes to move a web site to the top of the search engines. Colorado SEO offers your company a full spectrum of SEO services that will propel YOUR web site to the top search engines. Contact us at (303) 990-5934 today for a free consultation now!

If you are looking to hire the top SEO firm in Denver, we can help. We are looking for businesses toadd to our extensive list of client success stories. Lets be honest SEO has to be a win-win for both of us YOU the customer and us the SEO provider.

If we do a great job, YOU will see an awesome return on your investment. If you see an awesome return on your investment, you will likely stay with us long term. We are seeking long term, successful relationships with our clients and we would to help you optimize the profitability of your business online.

Contact us today at (303) 990-5934 to chat with one of our Denver SEO experts.

Whether your site seeks to target local keywords or national phrases, we can help. We have tremendous experience in both areas. We are also confident when working with advanced and Enterprise SEO projects.

Since mobile search queries have grown 500% in the past 2 years, and mobile usually yields local results, Google Maps optimization is now more important than ever.

Contact us today at (303) 990-5934 for a free quote, and let our Denver SEO agency start working to improve your companys internet marketing right away.

Get my FREE Quote

Statistics show that more than 1 billion people visit Youtube.com each month. Over 6 billion hours of video are watched during this same time frame. Since Youtube videos are now showing up in the Google search results, and because its the 2nd largest search engine in the world (only behind Google in market share), we believe video marketing warrants plenty of attention!

If you have videos for your business or services, we can help you monetize them. Studies show that web site owners who employ video on their web sites are likely to rank higher in the search engines. As your chosen SEO agency, we will work to optimize the videos with proven techniques and practices, to increase the visibility of your company.

Would you hire an electrician to do your plumbing? Probably not!

Its a common misconception that web developers are also SEOs. Web designers are usually strong at designing web sites, but often overlook the key components of search engine optimization (SEO). SEO firms are specialized in traffic generation and work specifically to increase traffic, leads and revenue to your web site.

An attractive web site is only one component for a successful internet marketing

campaign. Build it and they will come is just not realistic in the world of internet marketing. Our Denver SEO experts and consultants will provide you with the full service solution to effectively drive more revenue to your company via the Web.

Almost 2 billion people have smart phones worldwide. This year, mobile searches will surpass desktop searches for the first time ever.

That said, its important to make sure that your web site is mobile friendly, responsive and easy to find if someone does a search from a mobile device. We use the best practices to make sure your site is optimized for the search engines and that your web site is mobile ready.

Today, we no longer need to explain the benefits of search engine optimization. It seems that everyone gets it now. There are now billions of web searches each month in Google, Yahoo and Bing alone. There are over 2,600,000,000 ACTIVE internet users worldwide and 254,000,000 live in the United States. With that being said, the value of proper search engine optimization cannot be over stated. With a well-trained and highly educated SEO agency working with you, your worries of not being found can be put to rest.

When consumers search the web for products or services you offer, who will they find, YOU or your competitor?

Contact us now at (303) 990-5934 and well put together a custom plan for you to dominate the search engines.

Our Denver SEO firm stays current on all of the updates Google makes. We pride ourselves on being experts in our field. Over the past few years, Google has made changes to their algorithm, and that may have impacted your companys website negatively. We work to stay in top of all important search engine changes, and strive to find the best practices that coincide with the ever changing world of search engine optimization.

Score Higher in the Search Engines, give us a call now at (303) 990-5934. You will be glad you did

Get my FREE SEO Quote

Follow this link:
Denver SEO – #1 Search Engine Optimization Company – SEO Denver

 Posted by at 1:41 am  Tagged with:

PalmettoSoft: South Carolina Search Engine Optimization

 SEO  Comments Off on PalmettoSoft: South Carolina Search Engine Optimization
Jan 262016
 

SEO in South CarolinaMaximum Results, Minimal Expense

We are a full service search engine optimization company with offices in Charleston and Columbia, in South Carolina. We specialize in serving customers across the Palmetto State with proven SEO techniques, creative web design, effective pay-per-click campaigns, and other services. In addition, we make full use of communication and file-sharing software to serve clients with their SEO, PPC, and SMO needs across the nation.

Our operations are based in the beautiful seaside city of Charleston, SC. SEO services are invaluable for Charleston, Myrtle Beach, and Hilton Head businesses looking to reach the potential customers, and our central location allows us to stay in close contact with our clients in these busy regions.

From our Columbia office, we help companies in Columbia, Greenville, Rock Hill, and beyond as they seek to reach the millions of potential customers located right in their neighborhoods. Our clients love our responsive, friendly attitude; honesty; and flexible approach to web development and SEO. For ten years, PalmettoSoft has been providing clients with expert-level SEO services at prices that are extremely competitive when compared with other top shelf SEO companies. Our streamlined system has been refined over the years to give our clients the results they expect in the shortest time, for the lowest price, and with the least effort possible on their part.

Analytics, technical coding, keyword research, campaign managementdoing SEO the right way is simply beyond the time and resources of most companies. We specialize in managing all of the details for you so that you can focus on what your business does best. Our partnership allows your company to easily maintain a vibrant social media life, blog frequently, refresh its websites content, and conduct other Internet marketing activities to achieve better-than-ever online customer traffic.

Search engine optimization is the key to getting your website to the top of the search page rankings and keeping it there. Find out how we do it:

Locally based companies dramatically increase their traffic when they optimize for their geographic location. This approach is particularly effective in reaching mobile users.

Pay per click is the most effective paid advertising strategy available. A skillfully designed PPC campaign will give your website an incredible traffic boost in return for your investment.

Dont wait for visitors to find your site! Reach out to them on Facebook, Twitter, Google+, and other popular social media platforms.

We help you make your website more attractive to readers, more effective in converting visitors to customers, and more mobile-friendly.

Contact us today by email or phone to put our SEO skills to work for your companys website.

Read this article:
PalmettoSoft: South Carolina Search Engine Optimization

 Posted by at 11:41 pm  Tagged with:

Raleigh SEO Marketing Agency

 SEO  Comments Off on Raleigh SEO Marketing Agency
Oct 232015
 

Our Proven Strategies Will Help You Dominate Your Competition By Dominating Search Engines, Social Media & Mobile Users!

Hello Im Joseph Martin, owner of Raleigh SEOMarketing Agency in Raleigh, NC and I would love to work with you and your business. My company specializes in getting yourwebsite, videos, Facebook page, Yelp listing, and moreranked on the 1st page of Google. Search engine optimization isnt ouronly tool in the box though. We have the bestmarketing servicesmatched with proven strategies to get your business more leads, customers and sales!

Plain and simple when highly motivated and TARGETED customersareactively searchingfor your product or service, and your business is notranking in the top search results,youre losing a lot of business to your competition!!

Dominating the search engines means more traffic and leads for your business or even better, more customers, more sales and more profit. Imagine having multiple first page listings when your potential customers search for your product or service. See, customers have evolved all it takes is a quick Google search and potential customers could end up in the hands of your competitors if youre not at the top of the search results.

It means that if customers dont see your business when they are searching for your product or service, youre missing customersand missing sales. Let mehelp you by making sure your business is one of the first customers see. The primary goal I have is to make you more money than youre paying me; or in business terms, a positivereturn on investment (ROI). My team and I have this search engine marketing stuff down to a science. We know exactly how to optimize your website and get your business in front of your ideal customer, getting you results quickly. Thats something that other marketingagencies cant deliver.

As a potential client, I want you to know that Raleigh SEO Marketing Agency is the #1SEO Marketing agencyin Raleigh, N.C. maybe even the best in all of North Carolina. We have ranked countless businesses on the first page, and helped them grow their business. We can do the exact same for you!

Cost will vary depending on a threeprimary factors: Competition, Health andGoals. First we need to determine how much search engine competition your business has. Next we need to diagnose the current health of your website. And finally we need to discuss what your ultimate goals are. Knowing your business goals and budget willhelp us determine what is required. We can customize a plan for your business that will suit your specific needs.

More important than the cost is knowing that youll be working with an experienced agency that actually cares about getting you a positive return on your investment. We only take a limited number of clients, and only one client in a specific sector. This allows us toalways deliver maximum results. Hire us before your competition does!

Id love to discussyour business goals and show you how we can generate more traffic, leads, and sales for your company.

You can get started by completing the quote form.Ill get back to you right away! Joseph Raleigh SEO Marketing Agency

More here:
Raleigh SEO Marketing Agency

 Posted by at 9:41 am  Tagged with:

Bobs SEO, Las Vegas SEO Company, Affordable SEO Services

 SEO  Comments Off on Bobs SEO, Las Vegas SEO Company, Affordable SEO Services
Sep 232015
 

Las Vegas SEO Company

Bob’s SEO Co is a Las Vegas SEO firm in southern Nevada. We cater to the cost-conscience person who owns or operates a business that is in need of professional SEO services at prices that are lower than most. We realize that search engine optimization cost is an important factor of the decision making process when determining which firm to entrust your business’ livelyhood with. We take pride in the fact that we are competent enough to deliver results that rival (or exceed) larger SEO companies in the Vegas valley at a lower monthly investment.

If you own a website, then you must know the value of SEO. You can have the best website on the Web, full of information and full of products for potential customers to buy, but what good will that do if people dont even know your website exists? The best way to get massive traffic to your website is to position it on the first page of Google. And to make that happen, you need SEO, plain and simple. You need a real internet marketing expert to tweak and configure your website, so that it will rank high on the search results which will bring your Las Vegas business more sales and profits. It can be a frustrating feeling when your beautiful website cant get past the 10th page and yet, an ugly website is making tons of money because its on page 1. Fortunately for you, we are here to help.

With Bobs SEO, you get exactly what you want: more traffic to raise your business revenues.

With some Las Vegas area search engine marketing companies, what youll experience are grandiose promises and unrealistic expectations. So you pay them thousands of dollars believing that theyll make good on their word. What usually happens is that, eventually, you end up in the same (or worse) position you were in BEFORE you hired them in the first place! With us, youll never have to worry about this. Once you commit to us, we commit to you. We pride ourselves on delivering the “goods” and aren’t satisfied unless you are.

REMEMBER: Youre not just a client – youre a partner.

If you own a Las Vegas area business and choose us to be your SEO company, not only will we give you as much (or more) of what the higher priced guys do, but we’ll save you hundreds, possibly thousands of dollars while doing it. SEO is an investment. You invest dollars into it, and if you do it correctly you get an extremely high ROI (return on investment). Of course, the size of your investment is crucial. If you spend too much, then your risk is much higher. Our SEO plans are extremely affordable and our expert, professional SEO services will bring you results that meet or exceed your expectations.

Even though our expert SEO plans may cost less when compared to some other Vegas area agencies that offer SEO services, we are adept in using time-tested, proven strategies that work – plain and simple. We are not your run of the mill SEO agency. We live and breathe SEO, and we know what is needed to get your business website to the top. Just as we have done for many current and past clients.

Concerned about your online reputation? Negative search engine results showing up at the top of the page? We can help by getting those negative mentions of your business, brand or name pushed down in the search results so that there is much less likelyhood of anybody seeing them. Check out our reputation management page to learn more.

With Bobs SEO, you can expect only the best SEO methods and results. We use ethical techniques and our rates are affordable to fit with most any budget. By partnering with us, you have everything to gain and nothing to lose. Once you choose us, you can relax and sleep well knowing that you made the right choice. Call me for a complimentary consultation or follow me on twitter for the latest SEO news and tips!

More:
Bobs SEO, Las Vegas SEO Company, Affordable SEO Services

There’s a new way to invest in Bitcoin — But buyer beware …

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on There’s a new way to invest in Bitcoin — But buyer beware …
Sep 222015
 

Buying actual bitcoins has proven dangerous, to say the least. Just look at the unbelievable turbulence in Bitcoin prices — the currency’s value shot up 6,000% in one year before collapsing in value — and the alleged fraud at the Mt. Gox Bitcoin exchange that led many investors to lose money.

In theory, an exchange-traded fund, or ETF, that mirrors the price of Bitcoin would offer a somewhat safer alternative. Think: something akin to SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), which tracks gold prices.

But no Bitcoin ETFs have been created. An effort by the twins Cameron and Tyle Winklevoss to do just that has been waiting two years to receive approval from regulators. The Securities and Exchange Commission is still trying to figure out how to define and oversee Bitcoin.

This week, ARK Investment Management announced a full embrace of the digital currency. Its ARK Web x.0 ETF (ARKW) became the first ETF to invest in bitcoins.

“Current prices present an attractive entry point for our investors,” Cathie Wood, ARK’s founder and chief investment officer, said in a statement.

But before taking a leap, it would be smart to read the fine print of the ETF, which trades under the ticker symbol “ARKW.”

First, it’s not a pure play on Bitcoin. Even though it announced the Bitcoin play, the ETF is actually an investment in what it calls disruptive technologies. The crypto currency represents just a slice of its holdings, packaged along with Netflix (NFLX, Tech30), LinkedIn (LNKD, Tech30) and athenahealth (ATHN), a cloud-based provider of electronic health records.

Related: Chinese gamblers are all about Bitcoin trading

It’s investing in pink sheet security, not actual Bitcoin

Second, the ARK ETF is not actually investing directly in bitcoins. It’s buying shares of something called the Bitcoin Investment Trust. Most people haven’t even heard of that.

That trust started trading in May on the pink sheets under the ticker symbol “GBTC.” It’s got a market valuation of under $40 million and very little trading volume.

The pink sheets, also known as the over-the-counter market, provide less transparency and oversight from regulators. They’re like a Wild West alternative to the New York Stock Exchange and Nasdaq.

“Pink sheets are where most investors aren’t willing to tread,” said Matt Hougan, CEO of ETF.com, a research firm.

GrayScale, which sponsored the Bitcoin trust, defended the decision to list on the pink sheets and noted that a number of major foreign companies such as Adidas (ADDDF) and Roche (RHHBF) list their U.S. shares there.

Related: Winklevoss twins say Bitcoin will explode beyond $1 trillion

Spotty track record at mirroring Bitcoin

Another problem is that the investment hasn’t really mirrored the price of Bitcoin, which defeats the purpose. At times the trust’s shares have spiked or surged — even though underlying Bitcoin prices were relatively calm.

“You’re not really getting Bitcoin here. You’re getting a Bitcoin derivative that kind of tracks the price of Bitcoin — but not really well,” said Hougan. “There are a bunch of leaps of faith in that chain of command.”

The ETF company brushed away these concerns, suggesting that price volatility is actually a good sign.

Another risk for the investment is regulatory. The trust warns investors in disclosure documents that its future may be jeopardized by looming regulation from the SEC.

Related: Former fed in Silk Road case stole $820,000 in bitcoins

Bitcoin is not for the faint of heart

All of this is on top of the inherent risk that goes into investing in anything that has volatility of Bitcoin.

Founded in 2009, Bitcoin burst onto the financial scene this decade as investors looked for an alternative to traditional currencies. Prices skyrocketed more than 6,000% in 2013 before peaking at nearly $1,250.

And then prices collapsed, losing two-thirds of their value last year alone. While Bitcoin has actually calmed down a lot lately, it’s still down 27% this year to $230 apiece.

Related: Greeks rushed to Bitcoin as Grexit loomed

CNNMoney (New York) September 18, 2015: 11:53 AM ET

Read more from the original source:
There’s a new way to invest in Bitcoin — But buyer beware …

Mannix Marketing – Award-Winning SEO, Optimized Web …

 SEO  Comments Off on Mannix Marketing – Award-Winning SEO, Optimized Web …
Jul 222015
 

Whether you need search engine optimization, a custom website, or anything in between, we’ve got you covered. Discover the latest strategies for helping your business Get Found online and convert more leads today!

SEO is part science, part art. With 17 years of digital marketing experience, we know the art and the science of successfully getting you found on the web.

Responsive websites designed with conversions and SEO in mind not only fit every screen from a mobile to a PC, they also return more traffic, leads and sales.

Inbound marketing solutions from an experienced digital marketing team produce qualified leads that convert to sales.

Unleash the power of regional marketing guides to get found locally: LakeGeorge.com, Saratoga.com, Albany.com, GlensFalls.com, CliftonPark.com and GuideToWilliamsburg.com.

Are you looking for advice, or an experienced team to handle your social media marketing? We know how social media marketing can grow your business.

It takes time and experience to manage Pay-Per-Click (PPC) campaigns in a cost-effective way that provides a return on your investment. Our experienced marketing consultants maximize your time and your ROI, letting you focus on running your business.

Are you being found by your regional customers? Over 70% use online search to find area businesses. Getting found makes a big difference to your bottom line.

What’s the use of a beautiful website and lots of traffic if you can’t convert leads to buyers? With conversion rate optimization (CRO), we’ll help you convert more leads to sales.

Top-of-mind email campaigns convert browsers to buyers. From set-up to delivery, we keep your message in front of your customers and grow your e-list.

Read the rest here:
Mannix Marketing – Award-Winning SEO, Optimized Web …

 Posted by at 7:53 pm  Tagged with:

Almost a quarter of UK firms 'whittle down tax bills' using tax havens and loopholes, says new analysis

 Tax Havens  Comments Off on Almost a quarter of UK firms 'whittle down tax bills' using tax havens and loopholes, says new analysis
Apr 142015
 

By City & Finance Reporter for the Daily Mail

Published: 17:06 EST, 13 April 2015 | Updated: 17:06 EST, 13 April 2015

Almost a quarter of British firms are paying far lower taxes than the rates demanded by the countries in which they operate, an international study has suggested.

Analysis of more than 1,000 listed companies by MSCI found a tax gap of 56billion from firms using tax havens and loopholes to whittle down their bills.

By comparing the overall tax payments of the companies against the corporation tax rates levied in the countries where they did business, the investment research group was able to determine how many companies were scrimping on payments.

Tax loophole: Almost a quarter of British firms are paying far lower taxes than the rates demanded by the countries in which they operate, an international study has suggested

In the UK, 16 of the 71 included businesses had a tax gap of more than 10 per cent, it said.

MSCI director Linda-Eling Lee said these firms faced the prospect of falling profits if the tax loopholes were closed, as well as reputational risk if they are exposed for minimising tax.

The findings will inflame the debate around the issue of legal but dubious avoidance of tax.

The Government has sought to lead an international crackdown on what it sees as immoral tax dodging by multinational firms.

View original post here:
Almost a quarter of UK firms 'whittle down tax bills' using tax havens and loopholes, says new analysis

 Posted by at 8:47 pm  Tagged with:

Ex-Goldman director aims to hedge your bitcoin risk

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on Ex-Goldman director aims to hedge your bitcoin risk
Mar 102015
 

The nascent industry of bitcoin derivatives got a high-profile boost on Wednesday, as a London-based trading platform was launched by ex-employees of some of the world’s leading investment banks.

Crypto Facilities was set up by former bankers from Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, BNP Paribas and Societe Generale.

The platform pitches itself as a broker which specializes in bitcoin derivatives, and trades financial products like options and futures which are directly linked to the price of the cryptocurrency. Thus, it allows users to “go long” and bet that the price of bitcoin will rise, or “go short” and bet the price will fall.

Timo Schlaefer, the co-founder and CEO, was previously the executive director of credit quantitative modeling at Goldman Sachs in London. Speaking to CNBC via telephone Wednesday, he said he had worked for the investment bank for ten years but left to create this brokerage firm.

“I really wanted to help this industry develop and bring the experience that I have,” he said.

Schlaefer added that he saw real potential in the technology behind bitcoin – the block chain – which is a publicly-distributed ledger system which makes sure all transactions are verified in a transparent, decentralized and secure fashion.

Crypto Facilities is officially regulated by the U.K.’s Financial Conduct Authority. However, the regulator only oversees the company’s traditional derivative operations, as there are not yet any official regulations on the digital currency in the country.

Like Schlaefer, the Bank of England has also said it sees huge potential for the technology behind the digital currency bitcoin.

Read more from the original source:
Ex-Goldman director aims to hedge your bitcoin risk

 Posted by at 2:49 am  Tagged with:

MyCoin closes its doors, $387 million in investor funds vanishes

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on MyCoin closes its doors, $387 million in investor funds vanishes
Mar 092015
 

Summary:Bitcoin exchange MyCoin has vanished — leaving up to $387 million in investor funds unaccounted for.

Bitcoin exchange MyCoin has closed its doors, potentially leaving up to 3,000 investors out of pocket.

The closure of the Bitcoin exchange was originally reported by the South China Morning Post on Monday. MyCoin, a supposed Hong Kong-based virtual currency trading exchange, has reportedly closed its doors leaving as many as 3,000 local investors with combined losses of HK$3 billion ($387 million).

Bitcoin exchanges are no stranger to closures and controversy. The most famous example is that of Mt. Gox, once one of the dominant Bitcoin exchanges online. Tokyo-based Mt. Gox closed its doors without warning in February last year, filing for bankruptcy and leaving investors approximately $500 million out of pocket. The closure of Mt. Gox was followed by others struck by cyberattack, including Flexcoin, Poloniex and Bitcurex.

See also: Police suspect Mt. Gox Bitcoin theft was an inside job

However, MyCoin’s case may be different. Approximately 30 MyCoin clients are filing reports with local police that MyCoin was less of a Bitcoin exchange and more like a pyramid-style Ponzi scheme.

MyCoin customers were promised up to HK$1 million as a return on their money in four months for buying a HK$400,000 Bitcoin contract. The contract, which was meant to produce 90 bitcoins on maturity, also encouraged clients to lure others to the fold with new customer recruitment rewards such as extra profit, prizes and cars.

No customer was given written proof of their investment, and in December, MyCoin changed its trading rules — forbidding clients from withdrawing their virtual currency unless they recruited other customers.

One MyCoin client, who has lost HK$1.3 million ($168,000) in four Bitcoin contracts, told the publication:

Continue reading here:
MyCoin closes its doors, $387 million in investor funds vanishes

 Posted by at 2:50 am  Tagged with:

Financial freedom is just $4.5-million away

 Freedom  Comments Off on Financial freedom is just $4.5-million away
Feb 222015
 

Lets put a price on freedom.

Many of us dream of being able to walk away from work, supporting ourselves solely on income from our investment portfolios.

But what does that fantasy really mean?

The ideal arrangement would be to take as little risk as possible. We would live on only dividends and bond yields, without ever touching our capital.

To be sure, this dream could quickly turn into a nightmare if it required us to live on a pittance. Most of us would stipulate that we want at least as much annual income as the median Canadian family.

Given all that, what would freedom cost? Roughly $4.5-million, according to my calculations for the drum roll, please first ever Financial Independence Index.

The index is a toy Ive developed to answer the many readers who want to know when they can say good-bye to work without ever having to think about money again.

The good news and you may be happy to hear this is that the index is not designed as a realistic savings target for most families.

Think of it instead as an indicator of how financial conditions have shifted over the years and also as a demonstration of why most of us have to keep thinking about money and risk, even after we quit work.

The Financial Freedom Index owes a great debt to Scott Burns, a pioneer of personal finance journalism during his years at the Dallas Morning News. For years, hes compiled the Life of Riley Index, which puts a price tag on financial freedom for Americans.

Read the original:
Financial freedom is just $4.5-million away

 Posted by at 2:45 am  Tagged with:

Bitcoin investors claim $3b losses

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on Bitcoin investors claim $3b losses
Feb 082015
 

Jasmine Siu

Monday, February 09, 2015

The investors are among a group of Hong Kong and mainland individuals buying and exchanging the virtual currency bitcoins through Kryptogroup and its Hong Kong-registered transaction platform, mycoin.hk.

Under Kryptogroup’s system, bitcoin investors would sign “head contracts” with the group to buy 90 bitcoins at the beginning and accumulate 0.64 bitcoins a day for 12 months.

Their gains would multiply when they signed subcontracts, usually with appealing bonuses.

However, as Kryptogroup allegedly began changing the conditions on December 7 without issuing proper notices, some investors found themselves suddenly unable to invest in new subcontracts under the previous terms or exchange their bitcoins into Hong Kong dollars in accordance with the international market rate.

While the mycoin.hk website remains operational, its phone line is directed to voicemail, and its Tsim Sha Tsui office is closed for “internal renovation,” with the company name taken off the building’s directory.

An investor surnamed Chan, 81, said she tried contacting the four sales staff who approached her in the first place but to no avail. Many investors were introduced to the investment platform through professionals such as legal executives and property and insurance agents.

An investor surnamed Lau alleged she was tricked by her legal executive to join the platform as she recalled telling him she needed time to think about it, yet her bitcoin accounts were set up in just hours, without her official approval.

Lawmaker Leung Yiu-chung, who is helping the investors, said they were lured by the professional backgrounds of the sales team.

Follow this link:
Bitcoin investors claim $3b losses

Southeast Asian Bitcoin Site Charged With Securities Fraud

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on Southeast Asian Bitcoin Site Charged With Securities Fraud
Jan 272015
 

A Southeast Asia-based bitcoin website was charged with securities fraud after 72 others like it were seized and shut down this month by Manhattans district attorney.

Bitcoinhyip.org and other companies registered to YouYou Finance were seized Jan. 16 after an investigation that began in July, District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. said told an association of money-laundering specialists. An undercover agent e-mailed the site and was told he could not lose money in the investment, according to the complaint filed Monday in state court in Manhattan.

All you had to do, they said, was send them one bitcoin, and theyd send youthreebitcoins in return, within 48 hours, according to a copy of Vances speech. When our undercover investigator transferred a bitcoin to the operators bit-address, they kept it, and he never heard from them again.

The price of bitcoin has fallen almost 77 percent from its peak of $1,137 in November 2013 to about $267.

A federal case in Texas involving a $4.5 million Ponzi scheme was described by U.S. prosecutors in November as the first of its kind tied to bitcoins. Trendon Shavers, founder of Bitcoin Savings & Trust, raised at least 764,000 bitcoins by promising investors a return of as much as 3,641 percent, prosecutors have said. Instead, he used bitcoins from new investors to cover payments owed to earlier clients and paid for his own Las Vegas gambling and spa treatments, they said.

Vance has been an instrumental part of law enforcement investigations into money laundering at large banks including BNP Paribas SA (BNP) and Standard Chartered Plc. (STAN)

A year ago, Vance also testified at hearings convened in New York to discuss the regulation of bitcoins and other virtual currencies after the indictment of former Bitcoin Foundation Inc. Vice Chairman Charlie Shrem for money-laundering linked to Silk Road, a bitcoin-driven website allegedly used for buying drugs and other illicit goods. Shrem pleaded guilty and was sentenced in December to two years in prison.

Digital currencies have been linked to money laundering in the case of Liberty Reserve SA, described by the U.S. as a black-market bank that masked more than $6 billion in criminal proceeds. A manager pleaded guilty in August to conspiracy and operating an illegal money-remitting business, and seven people were charged by Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in May 2013.

On Monday, San Francisco-based startup Coinbase Inc. started the first licensed U.S. bitcoin exchange. Backed by the New York Stock Exchange, Coinbase Exchange can be used in the 24 states that support USD Wallets, according to a press statement.

The BITCOINHYIP.ORG website currently has no information on it, and has been replaced by http://www.seizedbymanhattanda.org.

Continued here:
Southeast Asian Bitcoin Site Charged With Securities Fraud

 Posted by at 1:47 pm  Tagged with:

Banks bet on bitcoin. Or are they?

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on Banks bet on bitcoin. Or are they?
Jan 222015
 

Other Coinbase investors include a subsidiary of USAA bank, the investment arm of Japanese telecom NTT DoCoMo and former Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit. In total Coinbase has raised $106 million, the company said.

Although some small banks have tested cryptocurrencies similar to bitcoin, Coinbase’s current round of funding is the first large investment from major banks into the technology, Armstrong said.

Read More Bitcoin keeps falling, and worries keep rising

Despite the recent problems for the digital assetincluding a sliding price and a costly hacking incidentthese investors are doing more than chasing a passing fad, he said.

“They’re really excited about it as a technology, and these people are bitcoin believers,” Armstrong said. “They’re really interested in the potential that it has to make payments fast, cheap and global for everyone around the world.”

Some technologists distinguish bitcoin the currency from bitcoin the technologythe digital protocol could be used for a number of financial applications that could potentially involve fiat currencies.

Read More Forget currency, bitcoin’s tech is the revolution

Armstrong told CNBC that he did not anticipate any of Coinbase’s investors acquiring his company in the near future. “We want to stay as an independent company,” he said.

Armstrong emphasized that bitcoin’s exchange rate (which went from about $1,150 in 2013 to the current level of around $220) was not essential to the success of his company, or its investors. As a provider of bitcoin wallets and facilitator of payments, Coinbase is more reliant on trade volume than daily price, he said.

Follow this link:
Banks bet on bitcoin. Or are they?

 Posted by at 4:48 am  Tagged with:

Finance firms placing bet on bitcoin, or are they?

 Bitcoin  Comments Off on Finance firms placing bet on bitcoin, or are they?
Jan 222015
 

Other Coinbase investors include a subsidiary of USAA bank, the investment arm of Japanese telecom NTT DoCoMo and former Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit. In total Coinbase has raised $106 million, the company said.

Although some small banks have tested cryptocurrencies similar to bitcoin, Coinbase’s current round of funding is the first large investment from major banks into the technology, Armstrong said.

Read More Bitcoin keeps falling, and worries keep rising

Despite the recent problems for the digital assetincluding a sliding price and a costly hacking incidentthese investors are doing more than chasing a passing fad, he said.

“They’re really excited about it as a technology, and these people are bitcoin believers,” Armstrong said. “They’re really interested in the potential that it has to make payments fast, cheap and global for everyone around the world.”

Some technologists distinguish bitcoin the currency from bitcoin the technologythe digital protocol could be used for a number of financial applications that could potentially involve fiat currencies.

Read More Forget currency, bitcoin’s tech is the revolution

Armstrong told CNBC that he did not anticipate any of Coinbase’s investors acquiring his company in the near future. “We want to stay as an independent company,” he said.

Armstrong emphasized that bitcoin’s exchange rate (which went from about $1,150 in 2013 to the current level of around $220) was not essential to the success of his company, or its investors. As a provider of bitcoin wallets and facilitator of payments, Coinbase is more reliant on trade volume than daily price, he said.

See the article here:
Finance firms placing bet on bitcoin, or are they?

Liberty Global (LBTYB) Downgraded From Buy to Hold

 Liberty  Comments Off on Liberty Global (LBTYB) Downgraded From Buy to Hold
Jan 122015
 

Editor’s Note: Any reference to TheStreet Ratings and its underlying recommendation does not reflect the opinion of TheStreet, Inc. or any of its contributors including Jim Cramer or Stephanie Link. TheStreet Ratings quantitative algorithm evaluates over 4,300 stocks on a daily basis by 32 different data factors and assigns a unique buy, sell, or hold recommendation on each stock. Click here to learn more.

NEW YORK (TheStreet) — Liberty Global (LBTYB) has been downgraded by TheStreet Ratings from Buy to Hold with a ratings score of C+. TheStreet Ratings Team has this to say about their recommendation:

“We rate LIBERTY GLOBAL PLC (LBTYB) a HOLD. The primary factors that have impacted our rating are mixed – some indicating strength, some showing weaknesses, with little evidence to justify the expectation of either a positive or negative performance for this stock relative to most other stocks. The company’s strengths can be seen in multiple areas, such as its increase in stock price during the past year, compelling growth in net income and revenue growth. However, as a counter to these strengths, we find that the company has favored debt over equity in the management of its balance sheet.”

Must Read: Warren Buffett’s 25 Favorite Stocks

Jim Cramer and Stephanie Link reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Jim Cramer’s protg, David Peltier, uncovers low dollar stocks with extraordinary upside potential that are flying under Wall Street’s radar.

Read more here:
Liberty Global (LBTYB) Downgraded From Buy to Hold




Pierre Teilhard De Chardin | Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution