Amazing Interview With Ed Snowden Man Who Exposed That The NSA Is Spying On Every American
June 09, 2013 CNN .
By: Danielle Jannahe
View original post here:
Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) Files Lawsuit Against Pres Obama NSA Mass Surveillance – Andrew Nap
Burnett Paints Rand Paul As An Outsider Before Interview About NSA Lawsuit videos.. Please click here to subscribe to my channel.. Economic collapse and fina. Sen Rand Paul (R-KY) Files Lawsuit…
By: Henry Kasap
Go here to see the original:
Simple Freedom Machine – Han Fan's EXCLUSIVE Interview With Giovanni – Hangout
Simple Freedom Machine – Han Fan's EXCLUSIVE Interview With Giovanni – Hangout.
By: Han Fan The Internet Man – Get BEST Bonus and Review HERE …
NSA Blackmailing Obama Interview with Whistleblower Russ Tice
Read more from the original source:
2Pac says the Illuminati is not real
Tupac Shakur in his own words denies the Illuminati exists in this interview. By examining his own words it is apparent he knew very little about the Illuminati at all. Little did he know…
Snowden Sits Down With Brian Williams For NBC Interview
NBC anchor Brian Williams interviewed NSA leaker Edward Snowden and journalist Glenn Greenwald in Moscow this week. Follow Christian Bryant: http://www.twitter.com/BryantCP See more at http://www….
Go here to see the original:
Illuminati Exposed | David Icke – HUMAN RACE, GET OFF YOUR KNEES
Illuminati Exposed | David Icke – HUMAN RACE, GET OFF YOUR KNEES A Project Avalon Interview with Bill Ryan SUBSCRIBE OUR BRAND NEW CHANNEL ILLUMINATI EXPOSED!! TAKE AN ACTIVE ROLE WITH US,…
By: Illuminati Exposed
Seo Kang Jun Interview
Seo Kang Jun Interview Subscribe: http://bit.ly/10TNEL1] South Korean actor Seo Kang Jun is best known for his roles in Cunning Single Lady, The Suspicious Housekeeper, and Good Doctor. He…
Read the original post:
Seo Kang Jun Interview – Video
Exclusive: The U.S. mainstream media portrays the Ukraine crisis as a case of Russian imperialism, but the reality is that Moscow has been reacting to aggressive moves by Washington to expand NATO to Russias border in violation of a post-Cold War pledge, writes ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern.
By Ray McGovern
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov used Wednesdays interview with Bloomberg News to address the overriding issue regarding the future of Ukraine, at least from Moscows perspective. Speaking in fluent English, he said Russia would be categorically against Ukraine joining NATO.
Lavrov said he welcomed the interviewers question regarding whether Ukraine can be part of NATO, recognizing it as a chance to shoehorn background information into the interview.It was an opportunity to explain Moscows position to a wide English-speaking international audience first and foremost Americans.His comments seemed partly aimed at those so malnourished on mainstream media that they might be learning the history of NATO enlargement for the first time.Lavrov said:
Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
In my view, it all started back in the 1990s, when in spite of all the pronouncements about how the Cold War was over and that there should be no winners yet, NATO looked upon itself as a winner.
Lavrov said U.S. and NATO reneged on a series of commitments: not to enlarge the Alliance; then (after NATO was expanded contrary to that commitment), not to deploy substantial forces on the territories of new NATO members; and then not to move NATO infrastructure to the Russian border.
All these commitments have been, to one degree or another, violated, said Lavrov, adding that attempts to draw Ukraine into NATO would have a negative impact on the entire system of European security. Lavrov said Russias national security interests and 25 years of recent history make this a key problem, not only for Ukraine and NATO, but also an issue of Russia.
Is Lavrov distorting the history?The answer is important the more so inasmuch as the information needed to form cogent judgments is rarely found in the U.S. mainstream media. What happened in the months immediatelybefore and afterthe fall of the Berlin Wall on Nov. 9/10, 1989, is key to understanding Russias attitude now.
See the original post here:
PUTIN TALKS ABOUT NSA, WW3 SYRIA, NUCLEAR IRAN, amp; DEADLY DRONES (Full Interview)
FOR LATEST BREAKING NEWS, CONSPIRACIES GLOBAL TRENDS, CLICK TO SUBSCRIBE, THANK YOU Vladimir. Russia Netanyahu Trying To Change Putins Stance On Iran Nucle. OBAMA v PUTIN Norway spied…
Go here to see the original:
Syracuse punks Perfect Pussy caught up with called JODY MACGREGOR via Google Hangout to chat about touring, their rough-hewen sound and Nardwuars place in the Illuminati.
Jarvis Cocker put this note in the liners of Pulps albums: Please do not read the lyrics whilst listening to the recordings. He wanted listeners to come to the words as part of the songs first, not as poetry on a page. When youre listening to Perfect Pussy though, reading the lyrics is recommended. The New York state punk band play the kind of noise rock where figuring out the words is difficult, but their frontwoman Meredith Graves makes putting in the effort more worthwhile than most. She might sound like shes just screaming, but actually shes screaming deeply personal stories for instance, about how her best friend blew her ex-boyfriend, and how she learnt to be OK with that, all while building to a cathartic wail.
Graves voice is kept low in the mix by Shaun Sutkus, Perfect Pussys producer and keyboard player, making their recordings sound more like a live show than most bands. Their album Say Yes To Love sounds like its coming direct from a dingy punk club like the ones theyre touring now, currently on the road in the US with fellow New York state punks Green Dreams. When I talk to them Sutkus is backstage with guitar player Ray McAndrew, waiting for their next show to start.
10 BANDS BRINGING ROCK BACK IN 2014
What do you normally do to kill time when youre on the road between gigs? Shaun Sutkus: We skateboard sometimes, throw around a football. Ray McAndrew: Hacky sack! SS: Hacky sack. But in the van I read and work on music and do emails. We have a PlayStation 2 so we can play Tony Hawk. RM: Watch some movies. Kids In The Hall, Mr. Show. SS: I dont really watch the movies in the van but Ill play video games. We listen to music too.
Who gets to decide what you listen to in the van? SS: Its actually a pretty chill group. Whoever wants to play music, they get to play whatever. RM: We all have headphones so if we dont want to listen to it we can just have our own stuff.
When will we get to see you in Australia? Ive heard great stuff about your live show. SS: I dont know if we can say but I think next year, very soon. RM: I think next year. SS: Very, very soon. I dont know if we can announce it yet but I know something is definitely in the works. Thats gonna be fun.
Have you done many shows outside America? SS: Just Canada and Mexico.
I saw your interview with Nardwuar which was hilarious when you were in Canada. You were on your way to play at a hot dog place. How did that show go? RM: It was a good show but SS: The venue was cool, some of the people there were questionable, but it was all in all a fun show. The hot dogs were really good. RM: They were really nice to us. SS: Nardwuar is definitely very cool and is like the shit just really nice. Interesting guy to talk to. The interview I think was only 14 or 20 minutes that he showed, but we hung out with him for two hours. That was amazing.
Great Interview on the Future of Money, Bitcoin – Trace Mayer at Inside Bitcoins 2013 Las
Great Interview on the Future of Money, Bitcoin – Trace Mayer at Inside Bitcoins 2013 Las videos.. Please click here to subscribe to my channel.. Economic collapse and financial crisis is rising…
By: Gerald Frey
Emily Miller on Second Amendment – SiriusXM interview
Emily Miller on Second Amendment – SiriusXM interview videos.. Please click here to subscribe to my channel.. Exclusive Interview With Mike Judge As He Defen…
By: Zack Elroy
The rest is here:
Emily Miller on Second Amendment – SiriusXM interview – Video
Rick Rozoff Calls Out the NATO Warmongers – Interview 881
As Ukraine remains on a knife-edge of military tension, the NATO forces continue their Eastern European expansion and military provocations. In this must-listen interview, Rick Rozoff of Stop…
By: Jane Marple
Read more here:
Common SEO Interview Questions
Common SEO Interview Questions.
By: Navdeep Kumar
Common SEO Interview Questions – Video
Bitcoin Fight Night Interview
Bitcoin Fight Night Interview izle, Bitcoin Fight Night Interview video, izle Bitcoin ATM leaves ABQ izle, Bitcoin ATM leaves ABQ video, izle Bitcoin ATM leaves ABQ. – Fapturbo 2.0 My Review/Opini…
By: Candy Majestic
See original here:
BTC CHINA Interview – BITCOIN CRASHES Due to CHINA Banking Ban. Not the END of BITCOIN
PLEASE DONATE BITCOIN or LITECOIN to Support our efforts to waken the masses to the NWO Agenda. BITCOIN: 18TndrqgZfHjPf7vv78jygxKF6vPfGwA7K LITECOIN: LSxSujE. Bitcoin drops below $1100 as…
By: Peter Jackson
WASHINGTON, May 7 (UPI) — The high-profile cases of Edward Snowden and Chelsea Manning have turned a microscope onto the U.S. intelligence community, launching a serious discussion on the balance of civil liberties in a post-9/11 world.
Secondary to Snowden and Manning’s revelations, but perhaps no less important, was the treatment of the whistleblowers themselves: Snowden lives exiled, and without a passport, in Russia, while Manning faces 35 years in federal prison. Both saw grievous abuses within the U.S. government that they felt must be revealed, and both paid for their consciences with their freedom.
Thomas Drake, a former NSA executive, was more fortunate. Drake witnessed what he said were privacy and Fourth Amendment violations, as well as a massive waste of funding on the Trailblazer project, which collected intelligence data off the Internet. He initially took his concerns to internal authorities, including the NSA Inspector General and the Defense Department Inspector General, then to the staff of the House Intelligence and Oversight Committees. He also passed his concerns on to a reporter at the Baltimore Sun, carefully avoiding divulging classified information.
In 2007, Drake’s home was raided by the FBI, in 2010, he was indicted by a grand jury and charged with illegally holding sensitive information, obstruction of justice and making a false statement. All along, he refused to plead guilty or help the government prosecute fellow whistleblowers.
The 10 charges filed against him under the Espionage Act were ultimately dropped, in exchange for a guilty plea on a misdemeanor count of misusing the NSA’s computer system.
Drake has since worked as a privacy activist, speaking out against the surveillance state. In an interview with UPI this week, he talked about what it takes to blow the whistle on the U.S. government and just how difficult it is to do.
(This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.)
UPI: What would you have done differently?
Drake: I would not have spoken with the FBI at all. I was speaking to them to report high crimes and misdemeanors; I was expecting them to come to my house for quite some time. I would have hired an attorney sooner.
Even though I made a conscious choice [to go through the proper channels], I didn’t have to. Under the NSA portion [of the Intelligence Community Whistleblower Protection Act], I could go directly to the Department of Defense or directly to Congress and not inform the NSA. That was the statute that you would exercise if you had a responsible belief as a whistleblower. Now there’s huge cutout: Any national security position is not covered by that act.
See the rest here:
May 8, 2014|12:22 pm
This Easter the Freedom From Religion Foundation (FFRF) posted another offensive, and historically inaccurate, sign touting Jesus as “a myth.” However, did you know an organization exists to counter the FFRF and other intolerant atheists? If you or someone you know has been the victim of militant, confrontational atheism then the place to turn is the Freedom From Atheism Foundation (FFAF).
Created in 2012 as a response to intolerant atheists seeking the removal of a Veterans Memorial that displayed religious symbols, the FFAF has grown leaps and bounds and boasts over 120,000 followers on their Facebook page as of this writing. The Freedom From Atheism Foundation was created as a grassroots civil rights Facebook group to help protect the rights of religious believers, address the rising tide of intolerant atheism across the world, and be a beacon of hope and support for victims of atheist hate.
The group currently has eight administrators, two of which I recently corresponded with for an interview. As they receive daily hate filled messages from atheists who dislike the group, they chose to use pseudonyms for this interview. Full disclosure, I am a member of the group and this interview was completely my idea.
1. Some readers may dismiss your idea that we need “Freedom From Atheism.” How would you respond and convince them otherwise?
Jonathan Gill: In the nominally or officially Christian states of the Western World, atheistic organizations have begun a quest to remove religion from the public sphere, despite the fact that it is an integral part of the foundation of these nations. Since the Cult of Reason in the French Revolution, organized movements of atheism have persecuted those who do not share their vision of a godless world. We at FFAF are a response to the intolerance exhibited by militant atheists, historically and in the present.
Dr. Jim Ryan: History has demonstrated that atheists, especially once they get into positions of power, have been brutally repressive toward those who do not share their faith. While many atheists in the West, especially the New Atheists, claim to be promoting science and reason, it should be noted that they have repeatedly stated that their goal is to eradicate those religions and religious beliefs that differ from their own. They are working to restrict freedom of religious expression and freedom of speech. There is every reason to suspect that if the intolerant atheists of today get into power they will be just as oppressive, if not more so, that the previous generations of atheists.
Follow us Get CP eNewsletter
2. What examples do you have of atheist intolerance towards you or believers in God?
Jonathan Gill: We’re now taking screenshots of intolerant and hate filled atheists who contact us and posting them on our website to raise public awareness of the issue. All of the quotes I’m going to share with you can be found on our Facebook page, Freedom From Atheism Foundation. Here are a few examples: One atheist contacted us saying “Wow you guys are literally so (expletive) stupid you should really consider killing yourselves.” The atheist merchandise corporation Evolve Fish responded to a pastor of a Church being murdered during Church service by stating “It sure would be nice if more church services ended like this one.” One atheist created a Facebook group called Virgin Mary Should’ve Aborted. Another atheist who contacted us said “American Christians should be labeled a hate group.” The atheist Facebook group Exposing the Insanity of the Religious Right said “I wish we could torch the churches.” Another atheist contacted us stating “Holy (expletive expletive), you are all retarded and need to be executed.” This is but a small sample of the rising atheist hate towards religious believers in America.
View original post here:
Freedom From Religion? How About Freedom From Atheism?
Summary: In an exclusive interview with ZDNet’s David Gewirtz, a senior NSA official explains why the agency regards security and civil liberties as more than a simple balancing act: “You have to have them both.”
ZDNet recently had the opportunity to sit down and discuss how the NSA approaches the difficult challenge of both protecting our security and supporting the American ideals of openness and transparency. The recent Heartbleed bug brought these issues to light in a particularly relevant way.
This article contains a transcribed version of that interview. Other than a few housekeeping clean-ups, the interview is verbatim.
Before we start, I also want to point out that I was permitted to ask whatever questions I wanted, and Neal Ziring, Technical Director in NSA’s Information Assurance Directorate was willing to answer them.
Here are some tidbits from the full interview:
And now, the full interview, in its entirety…
ZDNet: Let’s start out with some background. Tell us about yourself.
Neal: I’ve been at NSA since 1988, and I worked mostly in evaluation of security products, crypto products, things like that. I worked a little bit on mobile code security, executable content security as you sometimes call it at the DOD and IC levels. I worked a lot on router security, so if you go on NSA.gov, you can see some of the products I worked on, the guidance available on security, and I worked with NIST on security content automation protocol.
“The folks that are here on the inside get to see the intelligence that they’re delivering every day. They get to see a soldier go home who they gave intelligence to his platoon so it wasn’t ambushed.”
Then I spent four years working over in our Technology Directorate as a security architect for some large government systems including some that went out to the field like Iraq and Afghanistan. Then I came back to my home, IAD Directorate, to be the Technical Director. You can think of it like a senior technical advisor position to our director.
See the original post here:
Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum