Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman



ConLaw Class 22 – Individual Liberty III
Bowers v. Hardwick, Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas, United States v. Windsor.

By: Josh Blackman

Originally posted here:
ConLaw Class 22 – Individual Liberty III – Video



ConLaw Class 21 – Individual Liberty II
Eisenstadt v. Baird, Roe v. Wade, Planned Parenthood v. Casey.

By: Josh Blackman

See original here:
ConLaw Class 21 – Individual Liberty II – Video



First Amendment Award: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education
The Ford Hall Forum presents the 2010 Louis P. and Evelyn Smith First Amendment Award to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), which is dedicated to defending and sustaining…

By: Forum Network

Read more:
First Amendment Award: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education – Video



ConLaw 20 – Individual Liberty I
Meyer v. Nebraska, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, Buck v. Bell, Griswold v. Connecticut .

By: Josh Blackman

See the rest here:
ConLaw 20 – Individual Liberty I – Video

JACKSON, Miss., April 4 (UPI) — Gov. Phil Bryant said the Religious Freedom Restoration Act will protect “Mississippians of all faiths from government interference,” as he signed the controversial bill.

Supporters say the measure is similar to a federal law passed in 1993 that requires proof of a “compelling interest” in any government measure that imposes a “substantial burden” on religious practices. Critics say its real aim is to allow discrimination against homosexuals.

The law, which Bryant signed Thursday, also adds “In God We Trust” to the Mississippi state seal. It takes effect in July.

I am proud to sign the Mississippi Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which will protect the individual religious freedom of Mississippians of all faiths from government interference, Bryant said.

The Mississippi law was redrafted twice before being approved this week by the state legislature.

A number of states have religious freedom laws on their books, and others have recently considered them. Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer recently vetoed a bill, and the Oklahoma Senate effectively killed one that had already passed the House by a wide margin.

In Arizona, a number of businesses lobbied against the bill and said the state might lose the 2015 Super Bowl. Critics said the law was so broad that cab drivers who believe for religious reasons that women should not travel alone could refuse to serve them.

[LA Times]

Go here to see the original:
Mississippi governor signs religious freedom bill



Capitalism VS Individual Liberty

By: TheLazyNarcissist

Excerpt from:
Capitalism VS Individual Liberty – Video



Constitutional Atty Says Expansion Of Pres Power Threatens Liberty – Jonathon Turley -The Kelly File
Jonathon Turley: With The Rise Of An Uber President There Could Be No Greater Danger To Individual Liberty! I Really Think The Framer Would Be Horrified Wi…

By: Mass Tea Party

View original post here:
Constitutional Atty Says Expansion Of Pres Power Threatens Liberty – Jonathon Turley -The Kelly File – Video

Los Angeles, CA (PRWEB) February 05, 2014

The new elite service was designed in recognition that every individual website has its own unique SEO requirements and link necessities. The founders of SEO Empiro announced their new services in a statement that read, We understand that our clients need customized and results-oriented SEO, and that is what the Elite SEO service is designed to provide.

SEO Empiro follows a specific formula when offering their elite service to clients. The company analyzes the clients needs and provides niche relevant SEO components in the design of and SEO campaign. Once the campaign is fully implemented, the company runs and maintains the clients campaign on a monthly basis with emphasis on the specific niche of the site and its performance.

According to a company spokesperson, clients are attracted to the elite service because they like the fact that the package is created exclusively for their individual site. Typically, and SEO firm mass produces their SEO packages and sells them to many different clients who end up sharing links, tiers, and SEO structures with other webmasters. SEO Empiro experts point out that this business model lets and SEO package work for a short time, but eventually it gets identified and is no longer effective.

The SEO Empiro Elite SEO Service focuses on exclusivity and control. The service is built on four unique components to achieve this. First, there are no shared structures on the DEO campaign. There are also no shared link components and clients own the rights to all components used in the campaign. Perhaps most important, each SEO campaign delivered in discrete and private with no shared hosting, no IP sharing, no mass track back foot prints and no SEO dilution.

More information about the Elite SEO service is available on the SEO Empiro website at http://www.seoempiro.com. Visitors to the site can contact the company using the embedded form on the sites Contact Us page.

See the original post here:
SEO Empiro Launches Elite SEO Service Featuring Innovative And Unique Link Building Structure

Encyclopedia

freedom

in humans, the power or capacity to choose among alternatives or to act in certain situations independently of natural, social, or divine restraints. Free will is denied by those who espouse any of various forms of determinism. Arguments for free will are based on the subjective experience of freedom, on sentiments of guilt, on revealed religion, and on the universal supposition of responsibility for personal actions that underlies the concepts of law, reward, punishment, and incentive. In theology, the existence of free will must be reconciled with God’s omniscience and goodness (in allowing man to choose badly), and with divine grace, which allegedly is necessary for any meritorious act. A prominent feature of modern Existentialism is the concept of a radical, perpetual, and frequently agonizing freedom of choice. Jean-Paul Sartre, for example, speaks of the individual “condemned to be free” even though his situation may be wholly determined.

Learn more about freedom with a free trial on Britannica.com.

See the original post:
Freedom | Define Freedom at Dictionary.com



G. Edward Griffin | Individual Liberty is Better than New World Order Collectivism
Subscribe (it's FREE!) for more videos posted daily! http://bit.ly/Subscription-Link Charlie in the Box asks G. Edward Griffin to explain collectivism in an …

By: FinanceAndLiberty.com

See the original post here:
G. Edward Griffin | Individual Liberty is Better than New World Order Collectivism – Video

Second Amendment: The right to bear armsWhat is the Second Amendment?There are two principle versions of the Second Amendment: one version was passed by Congress, while the other is found in the copies distributed to each individual state and later ratified by themAs passed by the Congress:A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.As ratified by the States: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.The Second Amendment Defined:The Second Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.Stipulations of the 2nd Amendment:The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms.The right to arm oneself is viewed as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, the right to bear arms was instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense.The Second Amendment was developed as a result of the tyrannous rule of the British parliament. Colonists were often oppressed and forced to pay unjust taxes at the hand of the unruly parliament. As a result, the American people yearned for an Amendment that would guarantee them the right to bear arms and protect themselves against similar situations. The Second Amendment was drafted to provide for the common defense and the general welfare of the United States through the ability to raise and support militias.Court Cases Tied into the Second AmendmentIn District of Columbia v. Heller the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individuals right to possess a firearm to use for traditionally lawful purposes, such as defending oneself within their home or on their property. The court case ruled that the Amendment was not connected to service in a militia.ControversyThe gun debate in the United States widely revolves around the intended interpretation of the Second Amendment. Those who support gun rights claim that the founding fathers developed and subsequently ratified the Second Amendment to guarantee the individuals right to keep and bear arms. Those who want more stringent gun laws feel that the founding fathers directed this Amendment solely to the formation of militias and are thus, at least by theory, archaic.State Timeline for Ratification of the Bill of RightsNew Jersey:November 20, 1789; rejected article IIMaryland:December 19, 1789; approved allNorth Carolina:December 22, 1789; approved allSouth Carolina: January 19, 1790; approved allNew Hampshire: January 25, 1790; rejected article IIDelaware: January 28, 1790; rejected article INew York: February 27, 1790; rejected article IIPennsylvania: March 10, 1790; rejected article IIRhode Island: June 7, 1790; rejected article IIVermont: November 3, 1791; approved allVirginia: December 15, 1791; approved all

Second Amendment: The right to bear arms What is the Second Amendment? There are two principle versions of the Second Amendment: one version was passed by Congress, while the other is found in the copies distributed to each individual state and later ratified by them

As passed by the Congress:A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As ratified by the States: A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The Second Amendment Defined:

The Second Amendment is a part of the Bill of Rights, which are the first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution and the framework to elucidate upon the freedoms of the individual. The Bill of Rights were proposed and sent to the states by the first session of the First Congress. They were later ratified on December 15, 1791.

The first 10 Amendments to the United States Constitution were introduced by James Madison as a series of legislative articles and came into effect as Constitutional Amendments following the process of ratification by three-fourths of the States on December 15, 1791.

Stipulations of the 2nd Amendment:

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of the individual to keep and bear firearms.

The right to arm oneself is viewed as a personal liberty to deter undemocratic or oppressive governing bodies from forming and to repel impending invasions. Furthermore, the right to bear arms was instituted within the Bill of Rights to suppress insurrection, participate and uphold the law, enable the citizens of the United States to organize a militia, and to facilitate the natural right to self-defense.

Read more:
2nd Amendment – Constitution- Constitution Law, US …

Dec 202013

On todays edition of the FreedomCast, Avik Roy joins me to discuss the latest holiday health care news dump, why this delay in the individual mandate is in his words the most significant delay yet, and how those who were supposed to be helped most by ObamaCare are going to be left shouldering the majority of the cost.

Related Links:

See more here:
FreedomWorks – Official Site

Libertarians Recruiting More Candidates in Pursuit of Election Success

December 12, 2013

Central Texas is home to many Libertarians, as shown by this map of the percentage of votes Libertarians received by county. Map by Roy Varney.

By Roy Varney

For Reporting Texas

The shorthand for the original slogan of the Libertarian Party could easily be confused with an anagram or a new strand of flu. But TANSTAAFL pronounced tanstaffel and standing for There aint no such thing as a free lunch was the 1971 launch of an effort to shake up the countrys traditionally two-party political system.

The first platform promised to challenge the cult of the omnipotent state and defend the rights of the individual.

We kind of half-jokingly said there was something in that platform that could offend anyone, recalls Roger Gary, a party member since 1977.

Gary said hes seen the meaning of Libertarianism in Texas change dramatically during his tenure. He has also see significantgrowth in the partys ability to attract voters.

Libertarianism was once considered a fringe party in Texas, but thanks to improved leadership, prolonged public exposure and indirect benefits from the decline of the state Democratic Party, Texas is now the top producer of Libertarian candidates.

Follow this link:
Libertarians Recruiting More Candidates in Pursuit of Election Success



Individual Defense Pacts – A way to harden the liberty movement?
Sponsor: http://WeUseCoins.com – Individual Defense Pacts – A way to harden the liberty movement? This vid is – or likely will become – part of a playlist. S…

By: RidleyReport

Read more:
Individual Defense Pacts – A way to harden the liberty movement? – Video

There are two ways to try and understand the future. One is to gaze into the misty depths of a magic crystal ball and guess what might happen. The other is to view facts from a coldly logical standpoint and draw verifiable conclusions from them.

To make sense of rapid shifts in the SEO landscape, lets follow the famous detective of fiction lore, Hercule Poirot and begin with the psychology of the individual, or, in our case, the psychology of Google!

Why does Google do what it does? Lying hidden in plain sight are the keys to the mystery behind the shifting sands of online search.

Googles financial lifeline is ad revenue. The search giant depends upon people using its engine to find answers. If people stop coming to Google, wholl click on AdWords ads that surround organic search results?

Thats why they must prevent spamming, remove irrelevant search results, and give people what they want, whenever and wherever they want it. Its a tall order but Google is stepping up to the plate.

And, at least so far, they are winning!

By adopting a three-pronged strategy.

Intuit searcher intent, by going beyond search phrases to seek the meaning behind queries

1. Tailor Results to User Needs: Armed with a massive collection of user data that its not shy to use, Google is counting on things likesemantic searchand Trust rank to tailor results to its users needs.

Recognizing that Web search queries are often the jumping off point on a voyage of discovery, Googles semantic search initiative tries to mirror how humans understand the world, seeking to determine what users want from the terms they type into the search box or speak into their mobile phones (conversational search).

See the rest here:
The New SEO — It’s About People, Intent, & Meaning

Weve been rebuilding our reporting from the ground up at QueryClick; thus, Ive spent a much bigger chunk of my day-to-day activities analysing the actionability and effectiveness of a whole suite of different reports covering SEO, PPC and conversion optimisation (CRO).

PPC & CRO are heavily report-driven and have excellent data visibility, and as a result, are generally better understood to be a tool rather than an end in itself. SEO, on the other hand, has often fallen into the reporting-for-reportings-sake trap; however, there have been some surprising stand-out reports that I think are generally underestimated by most SEOs.

While Ill post about a few more complicated reports in later columns, this time, Ill focus on my number-one, action-driving report for SEO.

Pulled from Google Analytics via Google Webmaster Tools, your Search Engine Result Page (SERP) Impressions Vs. Clicks data is massively useful when determining if your most valuable organic terms are tweaked to the max to deliver every last drop of traffic possible.

Delivering improvements on your SERP CTR drives immediate traffic on highly relevant terms (youre already ranking for them, after all).

In addition, we know that Google has dialed up the importance of your click-through rate to general SEO performance, so if your individual ranking (and collectively all rankings held against a domain for a category of terms) is better than average, you can expect to see a rise in ranking as Google adjusts to promote the more popular/relevant listing youre providing for searchers.

Best of all, this report highlights immediate content refresh targets which, as we all know, is also a factor for improved SEO performance. A double win!

In fact, we can do better than just algorithmic SEO benefits. After all, youre going to be better matching a search query intent to your linked landing page so its very likely youll also see improved page bounce rates and cart conversion rates as a result of this work.

Ok, fantastic. Youre thinking, I have lots of really great incentives for running this report, and actionable content refreshes to page and page meta and title information from it. How do I build the report?

Google doesnt provide an expected SERP CTR, but you can pretty easily implement a 1-100 average CTR table to compare your average ranking position derived from Googles Impressions Vs. Click report in GA.

Read the original post:
SEO Reporting To Shift Your Bottom Line

Source: 12Petals Media Group

You find Freedom of Thought explicit in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The Freedom of Religion and Freedom from Religion are indeed linked to Freedom of Thought. They are principles associated with the individual liberty – the state of being free. Liberty is the value of an individual to cherish and enjoy various social, political, or economic rights and privileges. The notion of liberty holds the core of all democratic principles that recognize the freedom of an individual to embrace or deem a viewpoint, fact, or thought, self-directed and independent of others’ perspectives.

The Freedom of Religion and Freedom from Religion are also embodied in the international human rights law. You find Freedom of Thought explicit in Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), which is legally binding on all members of international community.

Religion can be perceived as a systematized assembly of belief systems. They present cultural systems with worldviews that relate humanity to sanctity and their perceived ethical standards.

Regarding the theme of Freedom of Religion, Wikipedia offers a fine overview of the research findings. [1] Freedom of Religion or Freedom of Belief is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community, in public or private, to manifest religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship, and observance; the concept is generally recognized also to include the freedom to change religion or not to follow any religions. [2] The freedom to leave or discontinue membership in a religion or religious group -in religious terms called “apostasy” – is also a fundamental part of freedom of religion, covered by Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” [3]

For cultivating a culture of human rights, the freedom of religion and freedom from religion need to be highly valued and advocated. Seeking an environment of equality with equal rights and individual liberty that benefits everyone, with or without any type of belief is central to humanity.

Viewed from this perspective and based on consideration for Article 18 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights, there are two broad helpful principles: [4]

I. THE SEPARATION OF RELIGION FROM STATE

See the rest here:
"Freedom of Religion" and "Freedom from Religion"

Two operators of Liberty Reserve SA, accused by the U.S. of helping to run the largest money-laundering scheme in history, pleaded not guilty to federal charges.

Vladimir Kats, a Liberty Reserve co-founder, and Mark Marmilev, who the U.S. said helped maintain the business infrastructure, made their first public court appearance since the U.S. announced the case on May 28. A May 24 appearance was held with the charges still under seal, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote said at todays arraignment in Manhattan.

I arraigned them previously at that time under another indictment, Cote said. I now understand that each of the defendants had a superseding indictment that named them and them alone.

When prosecutors told Cote that they intended to go to trial on the underlying indictment naming Kats and Marmilev together with five other individual defendants and Liberty Reserve, the judge said she would have to arraign the two men a second time. Both again pleaded not guilty.

This is a unique set of circumstances, a unique experience at least for me, Cote said.

Five of the seven men charged in the case were arrested on May 24, according to the office of Manhattan U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara. Kats, 41, and Marmilev, 33, both of Brooklyn, New York, are the only two in federal custody in New York. Two others are fugitives, the U.S. said.

Liberty Reserve, incorporated in Costa Rica in 2006, operated as essentially a black-market bank, and masked more than $6 billion of criminal proceeds, Bharara said on May 28 when he announced the case.

The company, which operated as one of the worlds most widely used digital-currency services, was structured as a criminal business venture, one designed to help criminals conduct illegal transactions, Bharara said.

The defendants are charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering, conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business and operation of an unlicensed money transmitting business. Conspiracy to commit money laundering carries a term of as long as 20 years in prison.

Kats and Marmilev consented to being held without bail, said Cote who scheduled the next conference in the case for Aug. 9. Lawyers for both men declined to comment after court.

Follow this link:
Liberty Reserve Operators Plead Not Guilty in Scheme

Liberty Universitys challenge to the health reform law will go back before the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va., on Thursday, with the school focused on getting Obamacare back before the Supreme Court.

Libertys lawsuit is the most wide ranging of the outstanding legal challenges to the health law, hitting everything from contraceptive coverage to the employer mandate.

But Thursdays oral argument wont be Libertys first trip to the 4th Circuit over Obamacare. The same court ruled in 2011 that a tax law prevented it from hearing Libertys case, including its challenge to the individual mandate, until at least 2014. But after the Supreme Court upheld the mandate last year, it told the 4th Circuit to go back and hear Libertys other claims.

Libertys lawsuit now has several points: that the employer mandate violates the Commerce Clause; that the individual and employer mandates violate the First Amendments religious protections as well as the Religious Freedom Restoration Act; and that since the individual mandates penalty was ruled a tax by the Supreme Court, the bill should have started in the House not the Senate.

The aspect of Libertys case thats gotten the most attention from other plaintiffs may be its contraceptives claim. The school says that the law is violating its right to religious freedom by requiring it to cover, through its employee health plans, birth control and drugs that it says can cause abortions. More than 50 other lawsuits have been filed throughout the country, challenging the same provision. And the issue is likely to reach the Supreme Court.

But Judy Waxman, vice president for health and reproductive rights at the National Womens Law Center, says Libertys case isnt the one that will get there.

Theyll throw spaghetti at the wall, but this is not going to be decided until the regulations come out [this summer] and they become subject to this, Waxman said.

Plus, the Obama administrations lawyers say that Liberty didnt file that charge back in 2010 the contraceptive coverage rules hadnt come out yet so it cant add that to its lawsuit now.

Liberty says, though, that the regulation is merely an example of its original claim that the law would somehow skirt the long-standing prohibition on using federal funds for abortion.

Read the original:
Liberty pushes Obamacare challenge

Liberty Ranch High School FFA is relatively new to the FFA organization, but this year all 4,500 attendees will remember Liberty Ranch as an FFA organization that has arrived, as their Parliamentary Procedure team came in first in the whole state of California, and teacher Mandy Garner beat out all the regional competition to be awarded State Star Advisor.

Brandon Denier was also the State FFA proficiency winner for goat production.

Liberty FFA president Annelise Wipfli really enjoyed her time competing at the state competition in Fresno.

The best part of state conference was being able to spend time with my chapter while meeting new members from around the state and attending sessions that were filled with excitement, guest speakers and powerful purposes.

The Liberty Ranch FFA state-winning Advanced Parliamentary Procedures team consisted of seven members. Olivia Montalvo, Alternate; Kelsey ODonoghue, Chair 5; Ryan Van Houten, Chair 4; Brian Dodson, Coach; Madison Owning, Chair 3; Jessica Pearson, Chairman; Chase Steele, Chair 2; and Brooke Hinders, Chair 1 spent many hours preparing with advisor Bryan Dodson. Winning individual awards on the team were Madison Owning for Outstanding High Individual Chair 3, Kelsey ODonoghue for Outstanding High Individual Chair 5, and Outstanding High Individual President was won by Chair Jessica Pearson.

Pearson was filled with pride for her Parli Pro winning team.

It is an amazing feeling to see that hard work really does pay off, said Pearson. I am very blessed to have accomplished this with some of the most amazing people in the world, my team.

Denier spent hours studying up on goats, and it paid off as he won State Proficiency.

I would like to thank my parents, the best Ag teacher Ms. Clement for her hours of hard work, our ranch veterinarian Dr. Webster for teaching me all the veterinarian information you need to know about goats, and the state and national sponsors, said Denier.

Montalvo was one of the seven members of the Liberty Ranch Parli Pro team.

Read the rest here:
Liberty Ranch makes name at State FFA



FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin




Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by us.groups.yahoo.com