Cyborg | Designer-Babies | Futurism | Futurist | Immortality | Longevity | Nanotechnology | Post-Human | Singularity | Transhuman

The NCAA suggested its main arguments to appeal the Ed O’Bannon ruling allowing college athletes to be paid will focus on amateurism and First Amendment rights on live broadcasts.

In a filing Thursday night with the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, the NCAA’s lawyers responded to a mandatory mediation questionnaire that asks to briefly describe the issues on appeal. The NCAA wrote, The issues on appeal include but are not limited to whether amateurism is presumptively procompetitive for an amateur sports league and whether plaintiffs’ claims based on a property right in the use of their (names, images and likenesses) in live broadcasts of sporting events are foreclosed by the First Amendment. USA Today Sports first reported the filing.

U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken ruled Aug. 8 that the NCAA’s restrictions on what Football Bowl Subdivision players and Division I men’s basketball players can receive unreasonably restrain trade and violates antitrust law. Wilken’s injunction will allow football and men’s basketball players to receive scholarships covering their full cost of attendance and deferred payments for the schools’ use of their names, images and likenesses (NILs).

For decades, the NCAA’s legal defense to avoid paying players has relied upon a landmark 1984 Supreme Court ruling that stripped the NCAA of TV rights and allowed conferences to sell their games. The NCAA has clung to a line from that decision: In order to preserve the character and quality of the (NCAA’s) ‘product,’ athletes must not be paid, must be required to attend class, and the like.

In her October 2013 summary judgment ruling, Wilken wrote the Supreme Court opinion does not stand for the sweeping proposition that student-athletes must be barred, both during their college years and forever thereafter, from receiving any monetary compensation for the commercial use of their names, images and likenesses. In her August judgment after a three-week trial, Wilken noted that the O’Bannon plaintiffs provided enough evidence to show the college sports industry has changed substantially in 30 years.

Wilken also wrote that the Supreme Court opinion stating athletes must not be paid differed from the NCAA’s own lawyers in the case. The NCAA’s lawyers in 1984 said during an oral argument that the NCAA was not relying on amateurism as a procompetitive justification and might be able to get more viewers and so on if it had semi-professional clubs rather than amateur clubs,’ Wilken wrote. In addition, Wilken wrote that the NCAA has inconsistently applied its amateurism rules throughout the association’s history and to this day.

Wilken’s injunction allows the NCAA to create a cap on the deferred licensing money as long as the cap is not less than $5,000 per year. It’s what’s called a less-restrictive alternative to the antitrust violation found.

By appealing based on amateurism, the NCAA could find relief or perhaps an even more damaging ruling. Conceivably, the appeals court could determine that amateurism is so illegitimate that it’s unreasonable for there to be any cap. That’s the argument attorney Jeffrey Kessler makes in his class-action lawsuit against the NCAA and the five major conferences.

Another issue the NCAA suggested it will appeal in O’Bannon relates to the First Amendment and live TV broadcasts — an area that generates billions of dollars for schools. The O’Bannon plaintiffs have sought to share that licensing revenue.

Earlier in the O’Bannon case, the NCAA claimed that the First Amendment and various state laws prevent college athletes from asserting any rights of publicity during game broadcasts. Wilken rejected that argument in April, writing that the First Amendment does not guarantee media organizations an unlimited right to broadcast entire college football games and questioned whether college athletes validly transfer their rights of publicity to another party.

See the rest here:
NCAA hints at O'Bannon case appeal strategy



First Amendment Rights Can Be Terminated
According to this Chicago Police Officer, “Your First Amendment Right can be terminated if you're creating a scene OR whatever”. I figured they must have broke the 'whatever' clause, but the…

By: Savas Kenan

More:
First Amendment Rights Can Be Terminated – Video



First Amendment: Speech and Press
via YouTube Capture.

By: lavan gray

Original post:
First Amendment: Speech and Press – Video



First Amendment Win SCOTUS 'Liars' Can Sue States Banning Speech Judge Andrew Napolitano F F
First Amendment Win SCOTUS 'Liars' Can Sue States Banning Speech Judge Andrew Napolitano F F First Amendment Win SCOTUS 'Liars' Can Sue States Banning Speech…

By: Breaking News

Read this article:
First Amendment Win SCOTUS ‘Liars’ Can Sue States Banning Speech Judge Andrew Napolitano F&F – Video



Sallyport Shakedown SPRyan821792
Read More at, http://thefreethoughtproject.com/officer-citizen-you-wrong-invoke-rights/ Two videographers were in Jacksonville Florida conducting a First Amendment Audit on Wednesday. They…

By: HONORYOUROATH

Visit link:
Sallyport Shakedown SPRyan821792 – Video

The NCAA suggested its main arguments to appeal the Ed OBannon ruling allowing college athletes to be paid will focus on amateurism and First Amendment rights on live broadcasts. Circuit Court of Appeals, the NCAAs lawyers responded to a mandatory mediation questionnaire that asks to briefly describe the issues on appeal. The NCAA wrote, The issues on appeal include but are not limited to …

Continue reading here:
NCAA offers hints of its O'Bannon appeal strategy



Bobby Jindal Backs Phil Robertson I Remember When TV networks believed in the First Amendment #News
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4evHV4_2WXs http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r2KGDVFLM3Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=teS4Yhv-xc0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3n5JSRiliHY http://www.youtube.com/wa…

By: HotNews

Here is the original post:
Bobby Jindal Backs Phil Robertson I Remember When TV networks believed in the First Amendment #News – Video

May 272014



Freedom of Speech Online
A 5-minute primer on the First Amendment and freedom of speech on the Internet by Prof. Mark Grabowski.

By: Mark Grabowski

Read the original:
Freedom of Speech Online – Video



Ted Cruz Warns That Dems Are Moving To 'Repeal' The First Amendment
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) said Thursday that Democrats are making moves to repeal First Amendment rights to free speech and religious liberty. credit https://www.youtube.com/user/CNSNews/featured…

By: natacha pinto

More here:
Ted Cruz Warns That Dems Are Moving To ‘Repeal’ The First Amendment – Video



Sen. Ted Cruz says Democrats plan to 'repeal the First Amendment'
Sen. Ted Cruz says Democrats plan to 'repeal the First Amendment'

By: Parmar Mehul

Visit link:
Sen. Ted Cruz says Democrats plan to ‘repeal the First Amendment’ – Video



DANGER ZONE: First Amendment Under Attack!
Alex covers the absolute race baiting of the american public by the mainstream media, and the attempt by the left wing to demonize the tea party and repeal t…

By: THElNFOWARRlOR

See the original post here:
DANGER ZONE: First Amendment Under Attack! – Video



Democrats Want To Repeal The First Amendment Ted Cruz
Sen. Ted Cruz at the FRC's Watchmen on the Wall 2014 event in Washington, D.C. “This year, I'm sorry to tell you, the United States Senate is going to be vot…

By: wakesheep

More:
Democrats Want To Repeal The First Amendment Ted Cruz – Video



Cruz Obama to repeal the First Amendment
The Democratic party wants to overturn 1st amendment, Esau does his victory dance for One World Government, but he will not triumph. so death to Esau, death …

By: Brently Bennett

More here:
Cruz Obama to repeal the First Amendment – Video

May 262014



What's Next? MVI 2358
Senator Ted Cruz said that 41 Democrats want to repeal the First Amendment, if they achieve that, what's next?

By: Gabor Zolna

Here is the original post:
What’s Next? MVI 2358 – Video



Democrats Want To Repeal The First Amendment
Watch Video Here – Like Us On Facebook – Via CNS Fair Use Clause. Democrats Want To Repeal The First Amendment . Sen. Ted Cruz at the FRC. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) told attendees at a Family…

By: New20

Read the rest here:
Democrats Want To Repeal The First Amendment – Video

Some restrictions on public behavior near traffic stops — for instance, speech-neutral orders to move some distance away from the scene — may be permissible, but "a police order that is specifically directed at the First Amendment right to film police performing their duties in public" is generally unconstitutional.

Read the original here:
Volokh Conspiracy: Federal appeals court reaffirms right to videorecord, including at traffic stops



Ted Cruz: Senate Dems Are Trying to Repeal the First Amendment
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) drew audible gasps Thursday when he told gathering of Christian conservatives that Democrats intended to amend the Constitution to limit free speech. “When you think it…

By: crazynews

See more here:
Ted Cruz: Senate Dems Are Trying to Repeal the First Amendment – Video



Americans sign petition to repeal the First Amendment

By: alex jones

Original post:
Americans sign petition to repeal the First Amendment – Video



Video: 'Islamic Jew-hatred' ads with Hitler Palestinian leader adorn DC buses
Bus ads linking “Islamic Jew-hatred” with Adolf Hitler are rolling through the streets of Washington, DC, with First Amendment protections guaranteeing they will remain a regular sight on the…

By: RT

Here is the original post:
Video: ‘Islamic Jew-hatred’ ads with Hitler & Palestinian leader adorn DC buses – Video



Ted Cruz: Senate Democrats Want To 'Repeal The First Amendment' This Year
Watch Video Here – http://newzvids.com/ted-cruz-senate-democrats-want-to-repeal-the-first-amendment-this-year/ Like Us On Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/pages/Newzvids/1408208679448002.

By: 68Truthseeker

Visit link:
Ted Cruz: Senate Democrats Want To ‘Repeal The First Amendment’ This Year – Video



FireFox! Start Your Own Web Hosting Company
Web Hosting Advertise Here $10 a Month Affordable web-hosting
Pierre Teilhard De Chardin




Designer Children | Prometheism | Euvolution | Transhumanism

Sign up below for the Prometheism / Designer Children Discussion Forum

Subscribe to prometheism-pgroup

Powered by us.groups.yahoo.com